Bibliografía

• Author: Douglas Husak
• Pages: 309-326

309

BIBLIOGRAFÍA

ABRAMS, N., «The New Ancillary Offenses», Criminal Law Forum, 1, 1989, pp. 1 y ss.

ADLER, M., «Expressive Theories of Law, A Skeptical Overview», University of Penn-

sylvania Law Review, 1363, 2000, pp. 148 y ss.

ALEXANDER, L., «Deontology at the Threshold», San Diego Law Review, 893, 2000,

pp. 37 y ss.

— «Insuff‌icient Concern, A Unif‌ied Conception of Criminal Culpability», California

Law Review, 931, 2000, pp. 88 y ss.

— Is There a Right of Freedom of Expression?, New York, Cambridge University Press,

2005.

— «The Philosophy of Criminal Law», en Jules COLEMAN y Scott SHAPIRO (eds.), The

Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence & Philosophy of Law, Oxford, Oxford Univer-

sity Press, 2002, p. 815.

ALLDRIDGE, P., «Dealing with Drug Dealing», en A. P. SIMESTER y A. T. H. SMITH

(eds.), Harm and Culpability, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996, pp. 239 y ss.

ALSCHULER, A. W., «Straining At Gnats and Swallowing Camels, The Selective Mora-

lity of Professor Bibas», Cornell Law Review, 1412, 2003, pp. 88 y ss.

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, The Federalization of Criminal Law, Washington D. C.,

American Bar Association, 1998, p. 20.

ANDERSON, D., «The Deterrence Hypothesis and Picking Pockets at the Pickpockets’

Hanging», American Law & Economic Review, 295, 2002, pp. 4 y ss.

ANDERSON, E., Streetwise, Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community, Chicago,

University of Chicago Press, 1990.

ARNESON, R. «The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems», Ethics, 624, 1982,

pp. 92 y ss.

ASHUTOSH, B., «Purpose Scrutiny in Constitutional Analysis», California Law Review,

297, 1997, pp. 85 y ss.

ASHWORTH, A., «Is the Criminal Law a Lost Cause?», Law Quarterly Review, 225,

2000, pp. 116 y ss.

— Principles of Criminal Law, 4.ª ed., Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2003.

ASHWORTH, A., y REDMAYNE, M., The Criminal Process, 3.ª ed., Oxford, Oxford Uni-

versity Press, 2005.

ASHWORTH, A., y ZEDNER, L., «Defending the Criminal Law, Ref‌lections on the Chang-

ing Character of Crime, Procedure, and Sanctions» (en prensa).

BAK-BOYCHUK, A., «Liar Liar, How MPC §241.3 and State Unsworn Falsif‌ication

Statu tes Fix the Flaw in the False Statement Act (18 U.S.C. § 1001)», Temple Law

Review, 453, 2005, pp. 78 y ss.

BARAK, A., Purposive Interpretation in Law, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2005.

Bibliografía

310

BARKOW, R. E., «Recharging the Jury, The Criminal Jury’s Constitutional Role in an

Era of Mandatory Sentencing», University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 33, 2003,

pp. 152 y ss.

— «Administering Crime», UCLA Law Review, 715, 2005, pp. 52 y ss.

— «Separation of Powers and the Criminal Law», Stanford Law Review, 989, 2006,

pp. 58 y ss.

BARNETT, R. E., «Restitution, A New Paradigm of Criminal Justice», en Randy BAR-

NETT and John HAGEL, III (eds.), Assessing the Criminal, Restitution, Retribution,

and the Legal Process, Cambridge, Ballinger Pub. Co., 1977, p. 349.

— «Curing the Drug-Law Addiction, The Harmful Side Effects of Legal Prohibition»

en, Jeffrey SCHALER (ed.), Drugs, Should We Legalize, Decriminalize, or Deregu-

late?, Amherst, Prometheus Books, 1998, p. 155.

— Restoring the Lost Constitution, The Presumption of Liberty, Princeton, Princeton

University Press, 2004.

BATEMAN, T., «Annotation, Validity, Construction, and Application of State Statutes

Prohibiting Sale or Possession of Controlled Substances Within Specif‌ied Distance

of School», ALR 5th, 593, 2000, pp. 27 y ss.

BAYLES, M., «Criminal Paternalism», en J. Roland PENNOCK y John W. CHAPMAN (eds.),

Nomos XV, The Limits of Law, New York, Lieber-Atherton, 1974, pp.174.

BEALE, S. S., «What’s Law Got to Do with It? The Political, Social, Psychological

and Other Non-Legal Factors Inf‌luencing the Development of (Federal) Criminal

Law», Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 23, 1997, p. 1.

— «The Many Faces of Overcriminalization, From Morals and Mattress Tags to Over-

federalization», American University Law Review, 747, 2005, pp. 54 y ss.

BECKER, G., «Crime and Punishment, An Economic Approach», Journal of Political

Economy, 169, 1968, pp. 76 y ss.

BECKER, L. C., «Criminal Attempts and the Theory of the Law of Crimes», Philosophy

and Public Affairs, 262, 1974, pp. 3 y ss.

BENNETT, W., «The Plea to Legalize Drugs Is a Siren Call to Surrender», en Michael

LYMAN y Gary POTTER (eds.), Drugs in Society, Cincinnati, Anderson Pub. Co.,

1991, p. 339.

BENTHAM, J., Principles of Morals and Legislation, London, Methuen, 1970.

BERMAN, H., Soviet Criminal Law and Procedure, 2.ª ed., Cambridge, Harvard Univer-

sity Press, 1972.

BERMAN, M. N., «Punishment and Justif‌ication» (en prensa).

BIANCHI, H., «Abolition, Assensus and Sanctuary», en Antony DUFF y David GAR-

LAND (eds.), A Reader on Punishment, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1994,

p. 336.

BIBAS, S., «Plea Bargaining outside the Shadow of Trial», Harvard Law Review, 2463,

2000, pp. 117 y ss.

BILIONIS, L. D., «Process, the Constitution, and Substantive Criminal Law», Michigan

Law Review, 1269, 1998, pp. 96 y ss.

BINDER, G., «Punishment Theory, Moral or Political?», Buffalo Criminal Law Review,

321, 2002, pp. 5 y ss.

BLACK, D., The Behavior of Law, London, Academic Press, 1976.

BLACKSTONE, W., Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765-1769).

BLENDON, R. J., y YOUNG, J. T., «The Public and the War on Illicit Drugs», Journal of

the American Medical Association, 140, 1998, pp. 279 y ss.