Sentencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 24-02-2011

Judgment Date24 February 2011
Procedure TypeFondo y Reparaciones
Respondent StateUruguay
CourtInter-American Court of Human Rights
Case TypeCaso contencioso
PublicationSerie C No 221.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
33 cases
  • Resolución de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 22-11-2016
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    • 22 November 2016
    ...Reparaciones y C.. Sentencia de 01 de marzo de 2005. S..C.G. Vs. Uruguay. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 24 de febrero de 2011 Serie C No. 221, párr. 225; Caso Vera Vera y otra Vs. Ecuador. Excepción Preliminar, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas, Sentencia de 19 de mayo de 2011. Serie C No. ......
  • Resolución de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 07-09-2012
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    • 7 September 2012
    ...Caso V.R.V.H.. Fondo, supra nota 20, párr. 176, y Caso Gelman Vs. Uruguay. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 24 de febrero de 2011. Serie C No. 221, párr. 191. [22] Cfr. Caso de los “Niños de la Calle” (V.M. y otros) Vs. Guatemala. Supervisión de Cumplimiento de Sentencia. Resolución de la......
  • Resolución de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 17-10-2014
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    • 17 October 2014
    ...C.. Sentencia de 25 de octubre de 2012 Serie C No. 252; Caso Gelman Vs. Uruguay. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 24 de febrero de 2011 Serie C No.221; Caso De la Masacre de las Dos Erres Vs. Guatemala, supra nota 42; C.A.A. y otros Vs. Chile, supra nota 29, y Caso Barrios Altos Vs. Perú.......
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 12.979 (Ecuador)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • 1 January 2020
    ...de 25 de enero de 2018, párr. 27. 204 Corte IDH. Caso Gelman Vs. Uruguay. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 24 de febrero de 2011. Serie C No. 221, párr. 205 Corte IDH. Opinión Consultiva OC-24/17 de 24 de noviembre de 2017. Serie A No. 24. Párr. 89. 206 Corte IDH. Opinión Consultiva OC......
  • Get Started for Free
14 books & journal articles
  • Caso N° 221 Gelman Vs. Uruguay
    • International Law
    • Boletín de Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos No. 4-2011, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...N° 221 GELMAN VS. URUGUAY Caso: Gelman vs.Uruguay Sentencia: Serie C Nº 221 Fecha de Sentencia: 24 de febrero 2011 Víctima: María Claudia García, María Macarena Gelman y Juan Gelman Estado parte: Uruguay Caso Completo en: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_221_esp1.pdf En......
  • La polisemia del control de convencionalidad interno
    • International Law
    • International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional No. 24, January 2014
    • 1 January 2014
    ...Humanos , 279-351 (H. Nogueira, Coord., Librotecnia, Santiago, 2012). 13 cidH. Gelman vs Uruguay. Sentencia de fondo y reparaciones. Serie C N° 221, pár. 239 (24 de febrero de 2011). Por su parte, Juana Ibáñez destaca este fallo no solo por referir que todas las autoridades están obligadas ......
  • Estudio jurisprudencial sobre la aplicación del control difuso de convencionalidad en Bolivia
    • International Law
    • Revista Iberoamericana de Derecho Procesal - RIDP No. 3-2, July 2024
    • 1 July 2024
    ...y no solo del Poder Judicial. (…). (Cfr. Corte IDH, caso Gelman c. Uruguay, sentencia de fon- do y reparaciones, 24 de febrero de 2011, serie C, n.° 221, e) Quinta etapa: vinculatoriedad de pronunciamientos contenciosos y consultivos En esta última etapa, cabe poner de relieve que la jurisp......
  • Espacios de Diálogo entre la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos
    • International Law
    • Revista Internacional de Derecho Humanos No. 7, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...noviembre de 2006. Serie C No. 162 27 Cfr. Corte IDH. Caso Gelman Vs. Uruguay. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 24 de febrero de 2011. Serie C No. 221. 28 Cfr. Caso Masacres de El Mozote y lugares aledaños Vs. El Salvador. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 25 de octubre de 2012. ......
  • Get Started for Free