Sentencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 24-02-2011

CourtInter-American Court of Human Rights
Judgment Date24 February 2011
Respondent StateUruguay
Procedure TypeFondo y Reparaciones
Case TypeCaso contencioso
PublicationSerie C No 221.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
33 cases
  • Report No. 45 (2025) IACHR. Petition No. 13.055 (Argentina)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • 1 January 2025
    ...más de 60 uruguayos en Buenos Aires”. Cfr. Corte IDH. Caso Gelman Vs. Uruguay. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 24 de febrero de 2011. Serie C. No. 221, párr. 56, Nunca Más. Informe Final de la Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas, Buenos Aires, Eudeba, 1984, capítulo 1.D: ......
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 12.979 (Ecuador)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • 1 January 2020
    ...de 25 de enero de 2018, párr. 27. 204 Corte IDH. Caso Gelman Vs. Uruguay. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 24 de febrero de 2011. Serie C No. 221, párr. 205 Corte IDH. Opinión Consultiva OC-24/17 de 24 de noviembre de 2017. Serie A No. 24. Párr. 89. 206 Corte IDH. Opinión Consultiva OC......
  • Resolución de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 22-11-2016
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    • 22 November 2016
    ...Reparaciones y C.. Sentencia de 01 de marzo de 2005. S..C.G. Vs. Uruguay. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 24 de febrero de 2011 Serie C No. 221, párr. 225; Caso Vera Vera y otra Vs. Ecuador. Excepción Preliminar, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas, Sentencia de 19 de mayo de 2011. Serie C No. ......
  • Resolución de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 07-09-2012
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Court of Human Rights
    • 7 September 2012
    ...Caso V.R.V.H.. Fondo, supra nota 20, párr. 176, y Caso Gelman Vs. Uruguay. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 24 de febrero de 2011. Serie C No. 221, párr. 191. [22] Cfr. Caso de los “Niños de la Calle” (V.M. y otros) Vs. Guatemala. Supervisión de Cumplimiento de Sentencia. Resolución de la......
  • Get Started for Free
19 books & journal articles
  • La polisemia del control de convencionalidad interno
    • International Law
    • International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional No. 24, January 2014
    • 1 January 2014
    ...Humanos , 279-351 (H. Nogueira, Coord., Librotecnia, Santiago, 2012). 13 cidH. Gelman vs Uruguay. Sentencia de fondo y reparaciones. Serie C N° 221, pár. 239 (24 de febrero de 2011). Por su parte, Juana Ibáñez destaca este fallo no solo por referir que todas las autoridades están obligadas ......
  • Caso N° 221 Gelman Vs. Uruguay
    • International Law
    • Boletín de Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos No. 4-2011, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...N° 221 GELMAN VS. URUGUAY Caso: Gelman vs.Uruguay Sentencia: Serie C Nº 221 Fecha de Sentencia: 24 de febrero 2011 Víctima: María Claudia García, María Macarena Gelman y Juan Gelman Estado parte: Uruguay Caso Completo en: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_221_esp1.pdf En......
  • El efecto erga omnes de las sentencias de la corte interamericana de derechos humanos
    • International Law
    • International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional No. 27, July 2015
    • 1 July 2015
    ...http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_75_esp. pdf. Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, CIDH, Gelman vs. Uruguay , Serie C 221, Fondo y reparaciones, Sentencia de 24 de febrero de 2011. Disponible en: http:// www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_221_esp.pdf. C......
  • Espacios de Diálogo entre la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos
    • International Law
    • Revista Internacional de Derecho Humanos No. 7, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...noviembre de 2006. Serie C No. 162 27 Cfr. Corte IDH. Caso Gelman Vs. Uruguay. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 24 de febrero de 2011. Serie C No. 221. 28 Cfr. Caso Masacres de El Mozote y lugares aledaños Vs. El Salvador. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 25 de octubre de 2012. ......
  • Get Started for Free