Listado de casos

AuthorAlejandro Chehtman
ProfessionProfesor asociado de la Escuela de Derecho de la Universidad Torcuato Di Tella
Pages347-350
347
LISTADO DE CASOS
Abebe-Jira c. Negewo, 72 F. 3d 844 (11.º cir. 1996).
Actividades militares y paramilitares en y contra el Gobierno de Nicaragua (Nicaragua c.
Estados Unidos), 1984 C.I.J. 431 (Sentencia de competencia y admisibilidad del 26
de noviembre).
Ahorugeze c. Suecia, TEDH 37075/09, 27 de octubre de 2011.
Al Odah c. Estados Unidos, 321 F. 3d 1134 (D.C. Cir. 2003).
Alaska Packers Association c. Industrial Accident Commission of California, 294 U.S.
532 (1935).
Alemania c. Dithmar and Boldt, Leipzig (1921) 16 Am. J. Int. Law, 721.
Bailey c. Estados Unidos, 74 F. 2d 451 (10.º cir. 1934).
Bao Ge c. Li Peng, 201 F. Supp. 2d 14(D.D.C. 2000).
Bates c. Johnston, 111 F. 2d 966 (9.º cir. 1940).
Beanal c. Freeport-McMoRan Inc., 969 F. Supp. 362 (E.D. La. 1997).
Bolchos c. Darrel, 3 F. Cas. 810 (D.C.S.C. 1795).
Brown c. Estados Unidos, 12 U.S. 110 (1814).
Brown c. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
Canal de Corfú (Reino Unido c. Albania), 1949 C.I.J. 4 (9 de abril).
Caso relativo al laudo arbitral emitido por el rey de España el 21 de diciembre de 1906
(Hond. c. Nicar.), 1960 C.I.J. 192 (18 de noviembre).
Chambre d’accusation, decisión del 4 de octubre de 1985, Klaus Barbie (inédito) (Fr.).
Ciertas tierras de fosfato en Nauru (Nauru c. Australia), 1992 C.I.J. 240 (Objeciones
preliminares y sentencia del 26 de junio).
Coleman c. Tennessee, 97 U.S. 509 (1878).
Corte Constitutional [C.C.], Decisión C-370/2006 (18 de mayo de 2006) (Colom.).
Corte Suprema de Justicia [C.S.J.], Sala de Casación Penal, 3 de diciembre de 2009,
Decisión 32672, Salvador Arana Sus (Colom.).
Corte Suprema de Justicia [C.S.J.], Sala de Casación Penal, 31 de julio de 2009, Deci-
sión 31539, Augusto Ibáñez Guzmán (Colom.).
Cour d’Appel de Paris, sentencia del 13 abril de 1994, Paul Touvier, 100 I. L. R. 338
(1995) (Fr.).
Cour de Cassation, sentencia del 27 noviembre de 1992, Paul Touvier, 100 I.L.R. 357
(1995) (Fr.).
Cour de Cassation, sentencia del 20 de diciembre de 1985, Klaus Barbie, 78 I.LR. 136
(1988) (Fr.).
Creekmore c. Estados Unidos, 237 F. 743 (8.º cir. 1916).
Davis c. Estados Unidos, 160 U.S. 469 (1895).
Davison c. Sel-Skins, 7 F. Cas. 192 (D. Con. 1835).

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex