Sentencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos del 18-09-2003

Judgment Date18 September 2003
Respondent StateArgentina
CourtInter-American Court of Human Rights
Procedure TypeFondo, Reparaciones y Costas
Case TypeCaso contencioso
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
104 cases
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 12.291 (Colombia)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • Invalid date
    ...C.C.B.. Sentencia de 18 de agosto de 2000. Serie C No. 69, párr.90. 35 Corte I.D.H., C.B.. Sentencia de 18 de septiembre de 2003. Serie C No. 100, párr. 127. 113vigilancia y la ausencia de una cama, ventilación e higiene en lo que describe como “ese antro” no resultaba acorde con el respeto......
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 11.830 (Perú)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • Invalid date
    ...Flores. Sentencia de 18 de noviembre de 2004. Serie C No. 115, párr. 140. 69 Corte I.D.H., C.B.. Sentencia de 30 de septiembre de 2003, Serie C N° 100, párr. 70; Corte I.D.H., C.H., C. y B. y otros. Sentencia de 21 de junio de 2002. Serie C No. 94, párr. 204; Corte IDH., Caso de la “P.B.(........
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 11.995 (Colombia)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • Invalid date
    ...Flores. Sentencia de 18 de noviembre de 2004. Serie C No. 115, párr. 140. 136 Corte I.D.H., C.B.. Sentencia de 30 de septiembre de 2003, Serie C N° 100, párr. 70; Corte I.D.H., C.H., C. y B. y otros. Sentencia de 21 de junio de 2002. Serie C No. 94, párr. 204; Corte I.D.H., Caso de la “P.B.......
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 12.408 (Panamá)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • Invalid date
    ...C.M.M.C.. Sentencia de 25 de noviembre de 2003. Serie C No. 101, párr. 120; Corte I.D.H., C.B.. Sentencia de 18 de septiembre de 2003. Serie C No. 100, párr. 42; Corte I.D.H., C.J.H..S.. Interpretación de Sentencia sobre Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo y Reparaciones (art. 67 de la Convenci......
  • Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
  • Derecho a la Libertad Personal
    • International Law
    • Boletín de Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos No. 2-2010, March 2010
    • March 1, 2010
    ...en situaciones de excepción 9 . 4 Caso Cabrera García, supra nota 9. Caso Bulacio vs. Argentina. Sentencia de 18 de Septiembre de 2003. Serie C N° 100, párr. 129. 5 Caso Castillo Petruzzi, párr. 108. Ver también la sentencia de la Corte Europea, Caso Brogan and Others, sentencia de 23 Marzo......
  • Sobre el deber de evitar dilaciones en el proceso por parte de los operadores de justicia
    • International Law
    • Boletín de Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos No. 1-2013, January 2013
    • January 1, 2013
    ...Consultiva OC-8/87 de 30 de enero de 1987. Serie A Nº 8, párr. 32. 55 Caso Bulacio Vs. Argentina. Sentencia de 18 de Septiembre de 2003. Serie C Nº 100, párr. 115 y caso Myrna Mack Chang Vs. Guatemala. Sentencia de 25 de noviembre de 2003. Serie C Nº 101, párr. 210. 56 Caso Myrna Mack Chang......
  • Derecho a la Libertad Personal
    • International Law
    • Boletín de Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos No. 2-2011, March 2011
    • March 1, 2011
    ...Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Chile, Nº 2/2010, p.8. 15 Caso Bulacio vs. Argentina. Sentencia de 18 de septiembre de 2003, Serie C No. 100, párr. 129; Caso Acosta Calderón vs. Ecuador, supra nota 12, párr.76; Caso Bayarri vs. Argentina. Sentencia de 30 de octubre de 2008. Serie C No. ......
  • El derecho a la reparación de las víctimas de desaparición forzada: hacia la justicia a través del Derecho internacional
    • International Law
    • Revista Española de Derecho Internacional No. LX-2, July 2008
    • July 1, 2008
    ...Mack Chang c. Guatemala, cit., par. 243, 264.d), 264.e) y 264.f); y Caso Bulacio c. Argentina, sentencia de 18 de septiembre de 2003, Serie C, núm. 100, par. [40] Cfr. Caso Maritza Urrutia c. Guatemala, cit., par. 169; Caso Myrna Mack Chang c. Guatemala, cit., par. 243; y Caso Bulacio c. Ar......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT