Bibliografía

AuthorLarry Laudan
Pages325-328
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
AL L E N , R., 1977: «The Restoration of In Re Winship», en Michigan Law Review, 76.
— 1993: «Constitutional Adjudication, the Demands of Knowledge, and Episte-
mological Modesty», en Northwestern Law Review, 88.
— 1994: «Factual Ambiguity and a Theory of Evidenc e», en Northwestern Law
Review, 88.
AL S C H U L E R , A., 1997: «A Peculiar Privilege in Historical Perspective», en R. H.
HE L M H O L Z , Ch. M. GR A Y , J. H. LA N G B E I N , E. MO G L E N , H. E. SM I T H y A. W. ALS -
C H U L E R , The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: its Origins and Development,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
AM A R , A., y LE T T O W , E., 1995: «Fifth Amendment First Principles», en Michigan
Law Review, 93.
— 1997: «Double Jeopardy Law Made Simple», en Yale Law Journal, 106.
AY L I N G , C. J., 1984: «Corroborating Confessions: An empirical Analysis of Legal
Safeguards against False Confessions», en Wisconsin Law Review, 4.
BELL, R., 1987: «Decision Theory and Due Process», en Journal of Criminal Law
and Criminology, 78.
BE N T H A M , J., 1827: Rationale of judicial evidence: specially applied to English
practice, J. S. MI L L (ed), 5 vols., London: Hunt and Clarke.
— 1843: Principles of Judicial Procedure with Outlines of a Procedure Code in
Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 2, London: W. Tate.
BE R G E R , M., 1999: 
en University of Illinois Law Review.
— 2000: «Reforming confession law British style: A decade of experience with ad-
verse inferences from silence», en Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 31.
BL A C K S T O N E , W., 1765-1769: Commentaries on the Laws of England, 4 vols., Oxford.
BR E N N A N , Jr., W. J., 1990: «The Criminal Prosecution: Sporting Event or Quest for
Truth? A Progress Report», Washington University Law Quaterly, 68.
BU R E A U O F JU S T I C E ST AT I S T I C S , 2001: Federal Criminal Appeals, 1999.
CA S E L L , P. G., 1996: «Miranda’s Social Cost: An Empirical Reassessment», en Nor-
thwestern University Law Review, 90.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT