Corte IDH. Interpretación de la Declaración Americana de los Derechos y Deberes del Hombre en el marco del artículo 64 de la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos. Opinión Consultiva OC-10/89 de 14 de julio de 1989. Serie A No. 10.

CourtInter-American Court of Human Rights
Judgment Date14 July 1989
Case TypeOpinión consultiva

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
174 cases
  • Report No. 63 (2015) IACHR. Petition No. 1344-08 y 90-09 (Brasil)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • 1 January 2015
    ...No. 5/11, Admisibilidad, Petición 702-03, Ivan Rocha, Brasil, 22 de marzo de 2011, párr. 24; citando, inter alia, Corte I.D.H, Opinión Consultiva OC-10/89, Interpretación de la Declaración Americana de Derechos y Deberes del Hombre dentro del marco del artículo 64 de la Convención Americana......
  • Report No. 80 (2012) IACHR. Petition No. 859-09 (Brasil)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • 1 January 2012
    ...No. 5/11, Admisibilidad, Petición 702-03, Ivan Rocha, Brasil, 22 de marzo de 2011, párr. 24; citando, inter alia, Corte I.D.H, Opinión Consultiva OC-10/89, Interpretación de la Declaración Americana de los Derechos y Deberes del Hombre dentro del marco del artículo 64 de la Convención Ameri......
  • Report No. 62 (2009) IACHR. Petition No. 1173-05 (Brasil)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • 1 January 2009
    ...Americana de los Derechos y Deberes del Hombre en el Marco del Artículo 64 de la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos, Opinión Consultiva OC-10/89 de 14 de julio de 1989, Serie A No. 10, párr. 45. V. también CIDH, Informe No. 19/98, Admisibilidad, Caso 11.516, O.T., Brasil, 21 de feb......
  • Report No. 75 (2007) IACHR. Petition No. 12.322 (México)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • 1 January 2007
    ...las disposiciones jurídicas pertinentes. Corte Permanente de Justicia Internacional. Caso Lotus, Sentencia del 7 de septiembre de 1927, Serie A No. 10, página Corte I.D.H., C.J.H.S.. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, R. y Costas. Sentencia de 7 de junio de 2003. Serie C No. 99. Párr.101 y 10......
  • Get Started for Free
53 books & journal articles