I/A Court H.R., Case of Ivcher Bronstein v. Peru. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of February 6, 2001. Series C No. 74.

CourtInter-American Court of Human Rights
Judgment Date06 February 2001
Case TypeCaso contencioso

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
51 cases
  • Report No. 36 (2008) IACHR. Case No. 12.487 (Ecuador)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • 1 January 2008
    ...Opinión Consultiva OC-5/85, Resolución del 13 de noviembre de 1985, Serie A No. 5, párr. 69; C.I.B.. Sentencia del 6 de febreiro de 2001. Serie C No. 74, párr. 151; C.H.U.. Sentencia del 2 de julio de 2004. Serie C No. 107, párrs. 112 y 116; C.R.C., Sentencia del 31 de agosto de 2004. Serie......
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 12.054 (Ecuador)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • Invalid date
    ...UK, judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A No. 108 14/1984/86/133, párr. 52. 10 Corte I.D.H., C.I.B.. Sentencia de 6 de febrero de 2001. Serie C No. 74, párr. 122. 14 bienes de una persona, y como tal está indudablemente prohibida por el ordenamiento interamericano. 71. Por consiguiente, par......
  • Report IACHR. Case No. 12.554 (Venezuela)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • Invalid date
    ...I.D.H., C.H.U.. Sentencia de 2 de julio de 2004. Serie C No. 107, párr 11 0; Corte I.D.H.; C.....I.B.. Sentencia de 6 de febrero de 2001. Serie C No. 74. párr. 148; Corte I.D.H., Caso “La Última Tentación de Cristo” (O.B. y otros). Sentencia de 5 de febrero de 2001. Serie C No. 73, párr. 66......
  • Report No. 121 (2010) IACHR. Case No. 12.431 (Paraguay)
    • International Law
    • Inter-American Comission of Human Rights
    • 1 January 2010
    ...Caso YATAMA. Sentencia de 23 de junio de 2005. Serie C No. 127, párr. 149; y Caso Ivcher Bronstein. Sentencia de 6 de febrero de 2001. Serie C No. 74, párr. 118http://www.cidh.oas.org/demandas/11.830%20Trabajadores%20Cesados%20del%20Congreso%20Peru%204feb05.pdf, párr. 79. 119 Ver CIDH. Info......
  • Get Started for Free
11 books & journal articles