Feminist approaches to teaching about VAW. Facilitating empowerment through a critique of dominant knowledges

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-10-2017-0221
Date20 May 2019
Pages430-446
Published date20 May 2019
AuthorTara Samantha Styles-Lightowlers
Subject MatterHr & organizational behaviour
Feminist approaches to teaching
about VAW
Facilitating empowerment through a critique
of dominant knowledges
Tara Samantha Styles-Lightowlers
Lancashire Law School, University of Central Lancashire,
Preston, UK
Abstract
Purpose Feminism has provided a sustained challenge to the widespread occurrence of violence against
women (VAW). Yet despite the tremendous efforts of feminist activists and academics, it continues to be one
of the most tolerated crimes in the world. This paper offers an account of the authors experiences teaching
about VAW in higher education (HE) and an overview of how specific approaches to teaching this subject can
provide an empowering space for students who have experienced such violence. The paper aims to discuss
these issues.
Design/methodology/approach Drawing upon the works of feminists committed to ending VAW,
transformative education as envisioned by Paulo Freire and Foucaults work on knowledge and power, the
author proposes a feminist informed teaching practice that facilitates empowerment through: giving voice to
women who have experienced violence; exploring and promoting the transformative potential of education
and; challenging traditional and dominant forms of knowing.
Findings A recognition of the social, historical and political context in which violence occurs, and how
traditional knowledge about it is accepted, is vital in empowering women who have experienced violence to
challenge dominant discourses that do not fit with their own perceived reality.
Originality/value Whilst there is currently a growing interest in the barriers to HE participation, the
author seeks to explore the ways in which some of the barriers can be addressed that students may face
whilst on HE courses, particularly in relation to self-awareness, empowerment and healing.
Keywords Foucault, Feminism,Empowerment, Violence against women,Freire, Transformative education
Paper type Conceptual paper
Introduction
This paper is based on the rationale behind my decision to do a Professional Doctorate in
Education (Ed.Doc). The paper does not focus primarily on the study, which is still in its
infancy. Rather it sets out my journey towards this point through an exploration of my own
teaching position and the link between my research and practice. It maps out my journey as
a woman and a survivor who teaches about violence against women (VAW) in a university
setting and attempts to draw together the various political, theoretical and methodological
approaches that inform both my teaching practice and the related study I intend to do.
I begin with an autobiographical account of my experiences teaching on a module that
explores VAW and then offer an overview of the literature, theories and methodologies that
inform my teaching practice. By mapping out my own journey, I do not offer a method of
how to teach VAW from a feminist perspective as such, but instead explore the
complexities, and sometimes contradictions, of bringing the self into the classroom. This is
particularly important when the subject being taught relates directly to the real lives of both
students and teachers. The paper highlights a need for the empirical work that I intend to
do, involving interviews with students, and offers an account my own experiences and
understandings as a woman, survivor and teacher so these can be explored further and in
connection with the experiences, and understandings, of women students who have
experienced violence. The works of Paulo Freire and bell hooks offer a framework for my
teaching practice, whilst the works of Michel Foucault and Adrian Howe are useful tools for
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion:
An International Journal
Vol. 38 No. 4, 2019
pp. 430-446
© Emerald PublishingLimited
2040-7149
DOI 10.1108/EDI-10-2017-0221
Received 7 August 2017
Revised 22 October 2017
25 February 2018
26 July 2018
22 October 2018
Accepted 24 October 2018
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/2040-7149.htm
430
EDI
38,4
building a critique of power and knowledge in relation to VAW, and for creating meaningful
spaces where VAW can be explored and challenged by those who are directly affected
by such violence.
The Ed.Doc is a post-graduate taught course which incorporates monthly classes with
assessments and a larger research project that has an explicit focus on my teaching practice.
The study I am doing involves interviews and focus groups with women students that I
have taught on a module on VAW. The questions will centre around the womens journey
into higher education (HE); their experiences of the module I taught and; their own
experiences and understandings of VAW and gender oppression. A deeply reflexive
approach will be required because my research is intentionally partial. It is built upon a
judgement about behaviour and a recognition of the harms caused by that behaviour.
I proceed from a solid assertion that VAW is wrong. Using Foucaults words, I am reacting
to that which is intolerable. It would be pointless to try and claim that I will try to be as
objective as possible and that I will not approach the research with any pre-existing
assumptions. It would also be a blatant lie. Declaring my starting position (and one which I
feel pretty certain will not change in the near future) does not make my research invalid, it
gives it purpose. But it is not enough to simply state my position. Acknowledging our
subject positions makes research much harder as it requires a constant interrogation of
our motivations, a continual reflection and vigorous self-critique. Declaring that I am a
woman who has experienced multiple forms of violence including child sexual assault, rape
and serious physical assault does not automatically qualify me to speak about or for all
victims and survivors of VAW but it does offer a transparency. It provides the context
for my research project. However, it would be far too simplistic to assume that it is
my experiences of violence that have prompted me to do this particular research. Personal
experience alone is not enough. It is important to engage with such experience and
interrogate the self in relation to others. My experience of teaching about VAW and having
other women disclose their own experiences have been some motivation. It is my
engagement with students that has prompted to ask questions about VAW in relation to
HE. It would be difficult to claim that my research, and motivation for doing it, are not
shaped by profound emotions: anger, fear, pain, sorrow, hope, a sense of solidarity and
sisterhood. I want to explore the impact of these emotions on teaching and learning about
VAW and the part they play in challenging violence and oppression.
Staring points: locating the self
I came to HE myself as a single mother and a survivor of multiple forms of violence.
My choice of degree was not determined by any particular interest in the subject. The degree
was running for the first time. High A-level grades were not needed and it was close enough
to where I was living at the time, with a one-year-old son, for me to commute. For the first
two years of my degree I worked as hard as I could with no real passion for the subject. I had
bought into the neoliberal claim that you can get anywhere you want in life if you just work
hard. I was driven by the need to get a good degree in order to get a good job and make a
better life for my son and I. It was a soul destroying experience, listening to expertsand
reading journal articles that explained people like me in a way that was alien and felt wrong.
I found myself thinking that I was wrong and that I had to make myself better. I felt a need
to distance myself from who I was in order to become one of these dispassionate experts.
In my third year, a new module, called Sex, Violence and Crimewas introduced, and it
was going to be taught by a Professor from Australia. We were told that this Professor was
a feminist. I was excited. The module had a huge impact on my life going far beyond the
grades that I achieved. It was a very difficult module but it was also liberating and
exhilarating. After feeling lost and wandering, suddenly I found a lecturer and a whole
series of readings that seemed to speak directly to me. The lecturer did not keep herself
431
Feminist
approaches to
teaching about
VAW

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT