Corporate governance reforms and bank performance: evidence from the Middle East and North Africa

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2016-0211
Published date02 October 2017
Date02 October 2017
Pages822-844
AuthorSaibal Ghosh
Subject MatterStrategy,Corporate governance
Corporate governance reforms and bank
performance: evidence from the Middle
East and North Africa
Saibal Ghosh
Saibal Ghosh is based at
the Centre for Advanced
Financial Research and
Learning, Reserve Bank
of India, Mumbai, India.
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of the study is to understand the importance of corporate governance reforms
for the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) country banks. To address this issue, the author combines
the staggered timing of corporate governance reforms for banks across MENA countries with bank-level
data for the period 2000-2012 and examine the impact on bank performance.
Design/methodology/approach The author employs fixed effects regression within a difference-
in-differences specification for the analysis.
Findings The analysis suggests that not all governance characteristics are equally effective and
some of these characteristics exert a more pronounced effect on bank performance as compared to
others. These results also vary across oil-exporting and -importing nations and differ during the crisis.
Besides, the authors find that improved operating efficiency and access to finance are the key channels
through which governance improves bank performance.
Practical implications Corporate governance reforms in the MENA countries need to be carefully
tailored, taking into account the inherent economic characteristics of the country for it to exert durable
impact. The challenge for policymakers is to find the right balance that can ensure maximum benefits for
the banking sector, while minimizing the challenges involved in its implementation.
Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the earliest studies for MENA
country banks to examine the interface between corporate governance reforms and bank performance,
while controlling for the possible endogeneity of such reforms on performance.
Keywords Corporate governance, MENA, Banking
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
Over the past two decades or so, a significant amount of attention in both the academic
literature as well as in policy circles has been devoted toward understanding the role of
corporate governance in banks and, more so, following the outbreak of high-profile
corporate irregularities in several advanced economies and elsewhere. The culmination
of these interests has resulted in the formulation of corporate governance codes in
several countries or, alternately, revamping the existing codes with focus on their
implementation[1].
One region of the global economy where the importance of corporate governance has
been relatively under-researched has been the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)
region. In the early 2000s, the World Bank (2003) had highlighted the significant
governance gap in the MENA region and suggested possible pathways to good
governance. Subsequently, although some studies have explored the efficacy of corporate
governance for the MENA countries (Saidi, 2004;International Finance Corporation, 2008;
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2005,2009,2011), these have
Received 7 November 2016
Revised 30 March 2017
Accepted 14 May 2017
PAGE 822 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE VOL. 17 NO. 5 2017, pp. 822-844, © Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 1472-0701 DOI 10.1108/CG-11-2016-0211
been more in the nature of documentary evidence, highlighting the weaknesses in
governance standards in the MENA region. With MENA countries having undertaken
significant governance reforms during the past decade, the efficacy of such reforms in
affecting bank performance remains a moot empirical concern.
To inform this debate, this paper studies the impact of corporate governance reforms on
bank performance. The information base comprises a sample of over 100 banks, a quarter
of which are Islamic, in 12 MENA countries during the period 2000-2012. The empirical
research design exploits the exogenous variation arising from the staggered reforms in the
corporate governance framework across the banking sector in these countries and adopts
a difference-in-differences research design to isolate the impact on performance. We find
that the economic impact of governance reforms on bank profitability is limited. However,
when considered in conjunction with relevant governance characteristics, these
magnitudes are quite significant in several instances and indicate that corporate
governance reforms do have a role to play in influencing bank profitability.
These cross-sectional heterogeneities also mitigates concerns about omitted variables.
Economically, it is possible that the results are driven by other contemporaneous reforms,
and not just those related to corporate governance. If that were the case, we would
incorrectly attribute changes in bank performance to governance reforms. Under such a
situation, exploiting the cross-sectional heterogeneity enables us to difference out such
effects. Additionally, as we can control for country as well as year effects, we are able to
take into account the changes in the regulatory and economic environment across
countries and over time.
A number of factors make the MENA banking sector a compelling laboratory to investigate
this issue. First, the insufficient development of equity and bond markets makes banks the
most important source of external finance for firms. In addition, the high level of family
involvement in corporations also necessitate close ties with local banks, more so given the
inadequate disclosure practices of companies which makes access to alternate sources of
external finance challenging.
Second, although these countries have introduced corporate governance reforms for
banks, the implementation of requirements contained in the relevant legislations vary
markedly across countries. Illustratively, in Oman and Egypt, the first set of countries to
enunciate corporate governance codes in 2002 and 2005, respectively, these standards
have become significantly more rigorous over the years, whereas in others such as Bahrain
and Kuwait, these norms are of recent origin. In addition, the statutes of these governance
codes also differ. In Algeria and Tunisia, these codes were introduced as voluntary;
however, in Saudi Arabia, Oman, Jordan and Qatar, these apply on a “comply or explain”
basis. This unevenness in the application raises the concern as to how far governance
codes impact bank performance.
Third, the recent global financial crisis and the subsequent political turmoil has significantly
eroded market confidence and dented capital flows to the region. By reinforcing corporate
governance standards, banks have not only sought to improve their market valuation and
lower credit and market risks, but additionally, engender improvements in governance
standards in borrowing firms, protect investors’ interests and, in turn, encourage durable
capital flows to the region.
The rest of the paper unfolds as follows. Section 2 presents an overview of the literature
and highlights the contribution of the paper. An overview of the evolution of corporate
governance standards in these countries against the backdrop of their banking and
financial systems follows thereafter. Section 4 discusses the data and methodology and
follows it up with an analytical assessment of the results. The final section
concludes.
VOL. 17 NO. 5 2017 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PAGE 823

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT