The Politics of Monologist Representation

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.13169/bethunivj.38.2021.0127
Pages127-149
Published date01 January 2021
Date01 January 2021
AuthorMusaموسى Al-Haloolالحالول
Subject Matterdramatic monologue,representation,objectivist posturing,reader's enthrallment,المونولوج الد ا رمي,التمثيل,التظاهر بالموضوعية,أسْر القارئ
127
Bethlehem University Journal 38 (2021)
The Politics of Monologist Representation
Musa Al-Halool1
1Professor of English & Comparative Literature, Taif Universi-
ty, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
This article proffers a deconstructionist reading of the dramatic monologue and
examines its rhetorical strategies and the politics of monologic representation,
by which the rst-person speaker/ monologist monopolizes discursive space and
over-represents himself, while silencing other voices in the text and refusing
them the freedom and space to express themselves. Through a close analysis
of monologist representation of the Other in various texts, including “Mending
Wall” by Robert Frost, “Devonshire Street W. 1” by John Betjeman, as well as
Ron Carlson’s short story “Bigfoot Stole My Wife” (albeit a dramatic monologue
in prose), this article seeks to expose the ways in which the poetic persona is
always partial, interested, and subjective, with not-so-subtle an agenda, a speaker
who passes value judgments on the human objects of his overbearing tone. By
examining the politics of monologist representation against both Aristotelian
ethos and Bakhtinian intonation, the article suggests that readers and critics can
give voice to the voiceless in this elastic genre and abandon their sympathetic
interpretations that practically absolve monologists of any bias towards their
absent enemies or any politics of representation.
Keywords: dramatic monologue, representation, objectivist posturing, reader’s
enthrallment,
Disclaimer: The opinions and views expressed in this article do not represent the
opinions of the Journal’s editorial board and staff of the Dean of Research at Bethlehem
University. The accuracy of the material and any errors in this publication are the sole
responsibility of the author.
128 Bethlehem University Journal 38 (2021)

























To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT