From Anita Hill to Christine Blasey Ford: a reflection on lessons learned

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-04-2019-0136
Pages101-108
Published date07 August 2019
Date07 August 2019
AuthorSarah E. Heck
Subject MatterHr & organizational behaviour,Employment law
From Anita Hill to Christine
Blasey Ford: a reflection on
lessons learned
Sarah E. Heck
Department of Geography and Urban Studies,
Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to offer a critical reflection on congressional testimony in the
#MeToo era from the standpoint of a millennial graduate student.
Design/methodology/approach This essay is based on observational data from a roundtable discussion
between Anita Hill and Kimberlé Crenshaw moderated by Dr Dorothy Roberts and connects to themes in
research on sex-based harassment.
Findings The findings of this essay suggest there is still much work to be done in operationalizing
intersectionally in the #Metoo era.
Originality/value The thoughts and opinions expressed in this essay are the authors own.
Keywords Feminism, Racial discrimination, Sexual discrimination, Anita Hill, Christine Blasey Ford
Paper type Viewpoint
Introductory remarks
On October 11, 1991, Anita Hill, a young black Lawyer, sat alone in front of the looming
all-male, all White Senate Judiciary Committee to tell her story of how the US Supreme Court
nominee under question sexually harassed her when she worked for him under the
Education Department and at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
I was only a toddler when she testified but had grown up hearing bits and pieces about what
had happened to her on that day. I knew, for instance, that a soda can was involved, that
she wore a light blue suit, and that her harasser was now a Supreme Court justice.
Twenty-seven years later, another woman, this time an older white woman, advanced in her
career as a psychology professor, sat in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee and testified
about her alleged sexual assault by another male US Supreme Court nominee.
Much has been made of the similarities between Anita Hill and Christine Blasey Fords
testimonies almost three decades apart (Bouchard and Schwartz-Taylor, 2018; Svokos,
2018). Both women are professors with advanced degrees. Both contacted the committee in
confidence, not wanting their identity revealed. Both had to witness categorical denials of
their testimony by their abuser. Both wore blue suits. As for the differences? Many political
pundits have noted a shift in public perception around sexual harassment in favor of Ford, a
concept that was beginning to forge into the public lexicon in the early 1990s, in part
through Hills testimony. The composition of the Senate Judiciary Committee has changed
since Hill testified in front of 14 white male senators. There are now four women and three
people of color on the committee. The nature of their allegations was also different. Hill
experienced repetitive sexual advances by Clarence Thomas in her professional life. Ford
alleged that Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her as a teenager at a house party decades
prior. Racism and whiteness played important roles, too. Hill was the target of vulgar
misogynoir, accused of making it all up and misunderstanding private courting rituals
among AfricanAmericans. Ford was largely relieved of racial dog-whistling and her pain
was publicly witnessed and validated, but that did not stop her and her family from
experiencing harassment, death threats, forced relocation and public speculation about her
motives. The difference in the committeesconfirmation votes for Thomas and Kavanaugh
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion:
An International Journal
Vol. 39 No. 1, 2020
pp. 101-108
© Emerald PublishingLimited
2040-7149
DOI 10.1108/EDI-04-2019-0136
Received 11 April 2019
Revised 24 May 2019
28 June 2019
5 July 2019
Accepted 6 July 2019
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/2040-7149.htm
101
From Anita
Hill to
Christine
Blasey Ford

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT