Founder‐CEOs and corporate turnaround among declining firms

AuthorChanchai Tangpong,Michael A. Abebe
Date01 January 2018
Published date01 January 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12216
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
FounderCEOs and corporate turnaround among declining firms
Michael A. Abebe
1
|Chanchai Tangpong
2
1
Department of Management, Vackar College
of Business and Entrepreneurship, The
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, 1201
West University Drive, Edinburg, TX 78539
2999, USA
2
Department of Management and Marketing,
College of Business, North Dakota State
University, Richard H. Barry Hall, 811 2nd
Avenue N., Fargo, ND 581086050, USA
Correspondence
Michael A. Abebe, Department of
Management, Vackar College of Business and
Entrepreneurship, The University of Texas Rio
Grande Valley, 1201 West University Drive,
Edinburg, TX 785392999, USA. Tel.: 956
6655225
Email: michael.abebe@utrgv.edu
Abstract
Manuscript Type: Empirical
Research Question/Issue: Despite the growing interest in leaders' role in the turnaround
process, there is a paucity of research on founderCEOs' role in achieving successful turnaround
among declining firms. In this study, using insights from the organizational identification litera-
ture, we argue that founderCEOs play an important role in turnaround attempts due to their
strong organizational commitment and psychological attachment to the declining firm as well as
the relative absence of agency problem issues common among their nonfounder counterparts.
Research Findings/Insights: Using data from a matched pair sample of 142 US firms that
experienced performance decline, we found that founderCEO leadership significantly increases
turnaround success in declining firms. We also found that, among turnaround firms, those led by
founderCEOs tend to put more emphasis on marketbased turnaround strategies, such as new
product introductions, and less emphasis on retrenchment actions, such as divestments.
Theoretical/Academic Implications: Our findings contribute to corporate turnaround
research by providing a more nuanced view of leaders' role in the turnaround process by specif-
ically exploring the effect of founder CEO leadership. Furthermore, this study contributes to the
turnaround literature by highlighting the strategic choices of founderCEOled firms and how
these choices influence successful turnaround. Finally, by introducing organizational identifica-
tion perspective, this study provides additional theoretical explanation of leadership antecedents
of successful turnarounds.
Practitioner/Policy Implications: The findings of this study suggest that boards of direc-
tors, shareholders, and consultants who often participate in turnaround management should care-
fully consider retaining founderCEOs and endorsing their leadership during the turnaround
process. Further, the findings provide turnaround specialists and other stakeholders with further
understanding of not only the importance of product market strategies in the turnaround process
but also founderCEOs' role in fostering such strategies.
KEYWORDS
Corporate Governance, Founder CEOs, Turnaround, OrganizationalDecline, Bankruptcy
1|INTRODUCTION
The focus on senior leaders' role in reversing declining organizational
performance is quite prevalent among the business press. Indeed,
stories of strong CEOs leading successful turnarounds in companies,
such as Apple, IBM, Ford, Starbucks and Xerox, abound across media
outlets (e.g. George, 2008; Groth, 2011; Kraemer, 2015; McIntyre,
2011). Both the media and practitioner community tend to emphasize
the strong, take chargerole leaders play in stemming performance
decline and achieving a successful turnaround (George, 2008; Slatter,
Lovett, & Barlow, 2006).
Past research in this area has documented the role senior
executives' play in organizational decline and turnaround (Lohrke,
Bedeian, & Palmer, 2004; Mueller & Barker, 1997; Trahms, Ndofor, &
Sirmon, 2013). A number of empirical studies have demonstrated the
need for leadership team replacement following declining performance
in order to achieve successful turnaround (e.g. Barker, Patterson, &
Mueller, 2001; Chen & Hambrick, 2012; Gong & Wu, 2011; Nguyen,
Received: 22 January 2017 Revised: 12 August 2017 Accepted: 14 August 2017
DOI: 10.1111/corg.12216
Corp Govern Int Rev. 2018;26:4557. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltdwileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/corg 45

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT