Determinants of adaptability and its impact on the change readiness of civil servants
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2021-0263 |
Published date | 17 June 2022 |
Date | 17 June 2022 |
Pages | 622-639 |
Subject Matter | Public policy & environmental management,Politics,Public adminstration & management |
Author | Tan Fee Yean,Fee Cheng Tan,Devika Nadarajah |
Determinants of adaptability
and its impact on the change
readiness of civil servants
Tan Fee Yean
School of Business Management, College of Business,
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia
Fee Cheng Tan
Malaysian Administrative Modernisation and Management Planning Unit,
Putrajaya, Malaysia, and
Devika Nadarajah
Putra Business School, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
Abstract
Purpose –Underpinned by Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), this study aimed to examine the mediating
role of employees’adaptability in the relationship between the five managerial climate factors (i.e., trust,
supportiveness, openness, clarity of goals and participative) and change readiness in public sector
organisations.
Design/methodology/approach –Adopting the quantitative approach, data were collected from 379
administrative and diplomatic officers. Analysis was done using partial least squares structural equation
modelling (PLS-SEM).
Findings –The results showed that trust and clarity of goals are significant motivational factors that
accelerate employees’adaptability. Adaptability, in turn, was found to mediate the effect of trust and clarity
of goals on employees’change readiness.
Originality/value –This study contributes to theory and practice by examining employees’adaptability as
an intervening variable in the relationship between managerial climate factors and change readiness with
specific reference to the public administration context.
Keywords Organisational change, Managerial climate, Adaptability, Change readiness, Trust,
Clarity of goals
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
“Change is the only constant in life”isaGreekphilosophythathasproventobetruefor
individuals, societies and business organisations alike. In times of change, employees
develop various feelings, thoughts and behaviours toward the change (Oreg et al., 2011).
They thus respond to change in different ways; somemay welcome it and perceive it as an
opportunity for growth, while others may view it as a threat and challenge the status quo
(Fugate and Soenen, 2018). Hence, the line of research on employees’change reactions such
as resistance to change, change readiness, commitment to change and change proactivity
is growing as researchers maintain that employees’change reactions could predict change
success (Ahmad et al., 2021;Oreg et al., 2011,2018). Among these change reactions, change
readiness received the most attention from scholars, even in the most recent studies (e.g.
Alolabi et al.,2021;Erlyani and Suhariadi, 2021;Van Praet and Van Leuven, 2022). In a
recent literature review, Ahmad et al. (2018) suggest that understanding factors that
influence employees’change readiness is more crucial than resistance to change because it
IJPSM
35,5
622
Conflict of interest: The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/0951-3558.htm
Received 1 December 2021
Revised 14 May 2022
27 May 2022
Accepted 31 May 2022
International Journal of Public
Sector Management
Vol. 35 No. 5, 2022
pp. 622-639
© Emerald Publishing Limited
0951-3558
DOI 10.1108/IJPSM-12-2021-0263
can be more useful for organisational development interventions as a proactive measure in
ensuring preparedness of organisation to make a strategic change. Roemer et al. (2021)
noted that employees’change readiness that reflects on their affective, cognitive and
behavioural responses is a comprehensive construct useful in determining the extent to
which employees’inclination to accept change, which is a major contributor to change
success. Alalobi et al. (2021) extend this logic and argue that employees who are high in
change readiness put in more effort to support the change and demonstrate significant
levels of persistence in overcoming various obstacles during change implementation.
Employee readiness for change can therefore motivate employees’proactivity and be
resilient in times of change (Rafferty et al., 2013;Sparr et al., 2022). Hameed et al. (2017)
suggest that when readiness in an organisation is high, the organisation is better able to
change quickly and gain a competitive advantage. Hence, change readiness that relates to
employees’receptivity to change deems significant.
Despite an increasing number of studies on organisational change, there is still much
value to be gained by exploring change readiness, especially the role of employees’
adaptability in eliciting it. Van Dam (2013) noted that a clear understanding of the
adaptability–change readiness relationship is still lacking, though adaptability has been
studied in many contexts such as training, leadership and career development (Johnston,
2016;Chen et al., 2020;Reupert, 2020). Correspondingly, Park and Park (2019) reported in their
literature review that the study of adaptability in the organisational change context remains
insufficient, highlighting a knowledge gap that future researchers should elucidate.
Research suggests that an individual’s adaptability can be shaped by contextual factors,
such as the managerial climate of an organisation (Parent and Lovelace, 2018). Schneider and
Barbera (2014) noted that everything that happens in an organisation is due to its managerial
climate, which encompasses the interactions and experiences shared between a manager and
his/her subordinates. The effects of these experiences provide guidelines for individuals’
decisions, ultimately influencing their behaviours at work (Pace and Faules, 1994). Hence, it is
believed that the managerial climate of an organisation is an influential factor in employees’
reactions to change. In order to adapt, an individual will react to change signals in the
external environment (managerial climate), decode them and promptly take action to learn
and search ways to embrace change. However, research linking climate factors, adaptability
and change readiness is scarce (Ahmad et al., 2018;Park and Park, 2019). In particular, little is
known about the specific dimensions of managerial climate that facilitate employees’ability
to adapt and be ready for change.
This study thus sought to address two research gaps in the literature. The first gap
pertains to the lack of research on the adaptability–change readiness relationship. Only a
handful of studies (Muluneh, 2017;Parent and Lovelace, 2018;Van Dam, 2013) have
attempted to test the effect of employees’adaptability in the context of managing change,
indicating the need for more research in this area. The second research gap that requires
attention concerns the predictors of adaptability. Although previous studies (Douglas et al.,
2017;Olafsen et al., 2021) have established links between organisational climate and change
reactions, their results do not provide a clear understanding of which dimensions of
managerial climate promote employees’adaptability and how these dimensions indirectly
lead to change readiness, especially among civil servants. It is indeed timely to study the
impact of these variables on civil servants, given that many countries have been trying to
reform their public sectors in order to gain stability in the global economic structure and to
react to the evolving demands of their constituencies (Poochareon, 2021). The incessant
changes brought forth by the government may have placed a high demand on civil servants,
who have had to respond quickly to reform initiatives. Henceforth, being able to adapt and be
ready for change is likely to be a prominent proficiency that civil servants must possess to
support government transformation plans. However, the biggest concern to ensure the
Change
readiness of
civil servants
623
To continue reading
Request your trial