Traditional cultures, indigenous peoples and cultural institutions

Pages23-25
>>>
Handling collections
which comprise
elements of cultural
heritage often means
that museums must
resolve complex IP
issues.
23
Museums, libraries, archives and other cultural in-
stitutions play an invaluable role in preserving and
providing access to their collections, an endeavor
that can raise a number of intellectual property
(IP) issues, especially in a digital environment.
Handling collections of elements of cultural her-
itage, or “traditional cultural expressions” (TCEs) of-
ten brings about specific and even more complex
IP issues.
Indigenous peoples and traditional communities
have expressed concerns that the very process of
preserving TCEs, like documenting and displaying,
for example, a traditional song or tribal symbol
can open the door to misuse or misappropriation.
Using a fictional example, this article illustrates the
IP issues involved in safeguarding cultural her-
itage. It is inspired in part by a case study featured
in Dr. Jane Anderson’s “Access and Control of
Indigenous Knowledge in Libraries and Archives:
Ownership and Future Use.
A Visit to Community X
In the 1960s, a researcher, Ms. Y, interested in studying
traditional cultures and their symbolism, went to com-
munity X. During her field visit, she made film and
sound recordings of an important ceremony. The
recordings featured the respected elder and leader of
community X. As Ms. Y made the recordings, she owns
the rights to those works and to objects of related rights.
Ceremony X may be qualified as a TCE. According
to the Draft Provisions for the Protection of
Traditional Cultural Expressions/Expressions of
Folklore, TCEs are any form, whether tangible or in-
tangible, in which traditional culture and knowl-
edge are expressed, appear or are manifested.
TCEs are products of creative intellectual activity,
including individual and communal creations.
They are characteristic of a community’s cultural
and social identity and cultural heritage and are
maintained, used or developed by that communi-
ty, or by individuals having the right or responsi-
bility to do so in accordance with the customary
laws and practices of that community.
The collections of TCEs held in cultural institutions
are priceless records of ancient traditions and
community histories integral to indigenous peo-
ples’ identity and social continuity. They reflect a
community’s history, traditions, values and beliefs.
In many cases, these TCEs have been documented
by researchers from outside the community. The
rights to that documentation – and the documen-
tation itself – are often not owned by the commu-
nity, but by those who made the films, recordings,
photographs, etc. As a result, communities often
believe that because they are not the owners,
they have lost control over the content.
Some 20 years later, the son of the respected elder and
leader of community X composed a song about his
community. To accompany the song, he decided to
make a video clip showing images of his father. While
there were not many images of his father available, he
remembered that an anthropologist had come to the
community many years before, and he eventually lo-
cated that anthropologist’s recordings at the central
national archive. At his request, the archive sent a
copy of the recording to the community without en-
quiring as to its intended use. The son of the leader
then incorporated footage of the ceremony in the
1960s film into his own video clip.
Was there copyright infringement? Not obtaining
Ms. Y’s permission meant that incorporating parts
TRADITIONAL
CULTURES,
Indigenous Peoples and Cultural Institutions
iStockphoto.com

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT