Banks’ CSR reporting – Do women have a say?

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2019-0338
Pages639-651
Date23 April 2020
Published date23 April 2020
AuthorTriinu Tapver,Laivi Laidroo,Natalie Aleksandra Gurvitš-Suits
Subject MatterCorporate governance,Strategy
BanksCSR reporting Do women have
asay?
Triinu Tapver, Laivi Laidroo and Natalie Aleksandra Gurvitš-Suits
Abstract
Purpose This paper aims to determine the associationbetween corporate social responsibility (CSR)
reporting of listed banksand female representation on boards while controlling for the impactof gender
quotas.
Design/methodology/approach Logistic regressions are used with bank fixed effects on a global
sampleof 285 commercial banks from 2005 to 2017.
Findings There exists a positive association between the proportion of women on board and banks’
CSR disclosure. Positiveassociation remains also after quota corrections for bankswith either below- or
above-quotafemale representation. Further,adding more women to boards than requiredby quota could
affect boards’CSR reporting in masculine countriesbut not in feminine countries.
Research limitations/implications The results are not generalizable to smaller listed banks andthe
used estimationapproach does not enable to detect causality.
Practical implications Policymakers interested in improving banks’ CSR reporting could introduce
genderquotas.
Social implications Gender quotascan enforce banks’ sustainable behaviour.
Originality/value First, it is the firststudy to thoroughly control for gender quotas whileinvestigating the
association between female representation on boards and CSR disclosure. Second, this papermoves
forward from the so-far predominant concentration on single-country studies on banks’ CSR reporting.
Third, this paper covers theaspect of a country’s masculinity-femininity asa factor that could influence
the associationbetween CSR disclosure and female representation.
Keywords CSR reporting, Board composition, Gender diversity, Gender quotas
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
The role of women on boards is a contemporary ethical issue for most companies (Terjesen
and Sealy, 2016). Previous studies have shown that the presence of women on boards
improves the board’s internal regularity, favours board strategic control and mitigates
conflicts (Benkraiem et al., 2017;Huse and Solberg, 2006;Nielsen and Huse, 2010). It is
also often associated with improved corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure and
CSR performance of companies (Harjoto and Rossi, 2019;Khan et al.,2019;Kilic et al.,
2015;Kyaw et al.,2017). In light of these benefits, several countries such as Norway,
Finland, Iceland and Belgium have introduced gender quotas starting from 2003
(Section 2). However, recent empirical evidence indicates that the introduction of
quotas has not always led to the desired outcome (Ahern and Dittmar, 2012;Matsa and
Miller, 2013;Terjesen and Sealy, 2016). This can be related to the legitimacy and
credibility issues surrounding the appointment of new female board members for meeting
the quota, as well as tokenism (Fitzsimmons, 2012;Terjesenet al., 2015). Surprisingly,
previous research has tended to overlook the impact of gender quotas on the association
between female representation on boards and corporate CSR outcomes (Barako and
Brown, 2008;Hossain and Reaz, 2007;Jizi et al., 2014;Khan, 2010). Understanding the
Triinu Tapver, Laivi Laidroo
and Natalie Aleksandra
Gurvits
ˇ-Suits are all based
at the TalTech School of
Business and Governance,
Tallinn University of
Technology, Tallinn,
Estonia.
JEL classif‌ication G21, G34,
M4, M14
Received 5 November 2019
Revised 21 January 2020
26 March 2020
Accepted 29 March 2020
We appreciate the insightful
comments received from the
members of the finance
research group at TalTech
School of Business and
Governance. Special thanks go
to Pavlo Illiashenko and
Karsten Staehr for their
constructive feedback.
Funding: This work was
supported by Tallinn University
of Technology under Grant B57
“Efficiency in Financial Sector
in Light of Changing Regulatory
Environment” and by the
Doctoral School in Economics
and Innovation, supported by
the European Union, European
Regional Development Fund
(Tallinn University of
Technology ASTRA project
“TTU
¨Development Program
2016-2022”, project code:
2014-2020.4.01.16-0032). This
paper represents the work
conducted in connection with
these grants. The funding
providers had no role in the
research process from study
design to submission.
DOI 10.1108/CG-11-2019-0338 VOL. 20 NO. 4 2020, pp. 639-651, ©Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 1472-0701 jCORPORATE GOVERNANCE jPAGE 639

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT