Aid for Trade--ITC's response: with billions of dollars at stake, Aid for Trade can be a shot in the arm for developing countries. When defining the scope, pay attention to the supply side, say ITC and its clients.

Authorde Sousa, Prema

The Doha trade talks may have stalled in July 2006, but there has been consensus on one issue: the importance of "Aid for Trade".

At the WTO's last ministerial meeting in Hong Kong, Japan announced trade-related development assistance spending of $10 billion over three years, the United States announced Aid for Trade grants of $2.7 billion a year by 2010 and the European Union and its member states announced trade-related development assistance spending of 2 billion € per year by 2010.

A WTO Task Force on the subject released recommendations at the end of July. "[T]here was a clear consensus in the Task Force that Aid for Trade is important in its own right and that it should move forward expeditiously despite the current difficulties in the Round," said Mia Horn al Rantzien, Ambassador of Sweden to WTO and Chair of the Task Force.

Organizations such as UNCTAD, the World Bank and ITC have linked trade and development in the past. Until recently, however, the link was not prominent in broader development circles. The tone began to change when world leaders announced the Millennium Development Goals in 2000 and gained momentum when the WTO launched a new round of talks in 2001.

The Doha Development Agenda promised to put developing countries' concerns at the heart of trade negotiations. Belonging to the world's largest trading club is important and WTO members from developing countries are queuing to join.

But being a member of the club isn't enough. Part of the answer lies in Aid for Trade. "The fact is that many developing countries have been unable to benefit from the market opening that WTO has achieved because they lack the necessary trade-related capacity and infrastructure," said WTO's Director-General, Pascal Lamy, at the September 2006 meeting of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Singapore.

Towards more coherence

There is still debate and varying views about Aid for Trade. It means different things to different people.

Various issues shape the Aid for Trade debate, relating to both the quantity and the quality of aid. One important influence is the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is examining how to measure and evaluate the impact of aid for trade. Other commentators offer "lessons learned" or good practices from regional or bilateral trade-related assistance initiatives. Among such lessons are the need for more predictable financing...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT