100 per cent organic? A sustainable entrepreneurship perspective on the diffusion of organic clothing

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2013-0074
Date14 October 2013
Published date14 October 2013
Pages583-598
AuthorErik G. Hansen,Stefan Schaltegger
Subject MatterStrategy,Corporate governance
100 per cent organic? A sustainable
entrepreneurship perspective on the
diffusion of organic clothing
Erik G. Hansen and Stefan Schaltegger
Abstract
Purpose – This paper analyses the sustainability-oriented transformation of industries from the lens of
sustainable entrepreneurship. The authors investigate the co-evolution between pioneers introducing
radically more sustainable offerings and (mostly large) market leaders with their responses. While
sustainability pioneers introduce new products in niche markets, incumbents advance them into the
mass market, together leading to the transformation of industries, markets and consumer habits.
Design/methodology/approach – The authors apply the sustainable entrepreneurship perspective to
a case study of the German clothing retail industry with a focus on organic cotton. The analysis covers
four of the ten largest German textile retailers. Data collection is based on public available sources.
Findings – The late 1970s saw the foundation of Hess Natur, which pioneered organic cotton practices
and supported the development of sustainability standards in the clothing industry. In the beginning this
was largely a phenomenon in niche markets, but to date some organic practices have diffused amongst
mainstream retailers. This is counter-intuitive, as theory suggests that incumbents only adopt practices
with significantly lower sustainability standards than companies in the niche.
Research limitations/implication The study suggests that more research should focus on the
co-evolutionary dynamics between pioneering companies and incumbents and examine whether and
how sustainability practices diffuse into the mass market.
Practical implications The findings can help managers to better understand their organisation’s role
in the transformation of industries towards sustainability and, vice versa, how the transformation may
affect them. Leading the transformation challenge by adopting organic and other sustainable supply
chain practices can be an important measure for market success.
Originality/value – This study is one of the few pieces of research investigating sustainability-oriented
industry transformation from a market-based perspective. Actual data on organic cotton diffusion in
German retail are presented.
Keywords Corporate social responsibility, Supply chain management, Corporate sustainability,
Organic cotton, Sustainability-oriented innovation, Textile industry, Sustainable entrepreneurship,
Integrated production, Transformation, Germany
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
The key idea of a sustainable economy is the lasting, worldwide guarantee of individual
opportunities to secure basic needs as well as attain a greater quality of life while at the same
time preserving nature and promoting humane social relationships (cf. for example World
Commission on Environment and Development, 1987). Changed and changing markets and
legal, political and social conditions challenge companies to take greater account of
sustainability. The degree of sustainability-oriented industry transformation varies from one
country to the next; however, it is always influenced or even shaped by changes in and of
corporations. In this context, corporate sustainability does not mean (superficial) ‘‘repair’’ or
‘‘corrections’’ of corporate activities, but instead making deep changes, i.e. making
sustainability principles an integral element of corporate value creation – knowing that
DOI 10.1108/CG-06-2013-0074 VOL. 13 NO. 5 2013, pp. 583-598, QEmerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN 1472-0701
j
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
j
PAGE 583
Erik G. Hansen is a
Postdoctoral Research
Associate and Stefan
Schaltegger is Professor in
Sustainability Management
and Head of the Institute,
both at the Centre for
Sustainability Management
(CSM), Leuphana
University of Lu
¨neburg,
Lu
¨neburg, Germany.
The authors thank their student
assistants Florian Reinert and
Thomas Sommereisen for their
valuable background research.
engagement is most credible when it is comprehensive and lasting and contributes not only
to social and ecological development but also to corporate success.
Industry transformation towards sustainability has been studied in the literature on
sustainable entrepreneurship. Here, new ventures are considered key to introduce radical,
more sustainable offerings in the market to which incumbent firms react, ultimately leading to
a co-evolutionary process toward industry transformation (Hockerts and Wu
¨stenhagen,
2010). Often it is assumed that new ventures introduce higher sustainability standards
whereas incumbent firms adopt only ‘‘watered down’ ’ versions. While this may be often true,
we also find indications that incumbents may also adopt higher standards. It is our aim to
contribute to this literature by presenting an illustrative examination of the clothing industry,
with a focus on the diffusion of organic cotton through incumbent retailers. The change from
conventional cotton to organic and other more sustainable forms of cotton indeed represents
a strategic innovation to incumbent retailers, as they need to:
Bdevelop sustainability consciousness and purchasing patterns of consumers or to enter
new consumer segments;
Bbuild up new competencies in managing the upstream supply chain (i.e. cotton
cultivation); and
Bcreate or engage in co-operation to increase the cultivation of more sustainable cotton.
The paper is structured as follows: in the second section we present the conceptual
framework rooted in the literature on sustainable entrepreneurship. The third section gives
an overview of sustainability issues and the important aspects of sustainability management
in the clothing industry. Section four presents the case study method. The fifth section
presents the findings of the illustrative case study in the clothing industry.Finally, section six
discusses the findings.
2. Conceptual framing: sustainable entrepreneurship
Corporate innovativeness, triggered by sustainability-oriented business leaders and
processes, has initiated a dynamic process in Germany and many other countries
worldwide. This has shaped growth and change processes in companies, and fundamental
structural change in industries and in the economy as a whole. This in turn has influenced the
kind of management increasingly needed to lead a company today successfully.
Corporate sustainability is about systematic management efforts to make a company’s value
creation and related production processes, products and services more sustainable by
reducing negative and increasing positive ecological and social impacts (Schaltegger and
Burritt, 2005). Corporate sustainability can thus be understood as innovation into the
(normative) direction of sustainability. Processes, products and even business models are
improved or replaced to become considerably more ecological and social than previous
versions (Boons and Lu
¨deke-Freund, 2013; Hansen et al., 2009; Hansen and Große-Dunker,
2013). Thus, not only optimisation, but also a fundamental rethinking of the core business
and revenue logic is necessary (Schaltegger et al., 2012). Unsustainable products and
production processes or even entire technological regimes must be abandoned and new
ones created in their place. In the Schumpeterian sense of the ‘‘creative destroyer’’
(Schumpeter, 2006), a sustainable entrepreneur is expected to take unsustainable
conditions as occasions for creating new and more sustainable products, services, and
organisational forms, which can then replace existing structures, making them unattractive
or even obsolete. This is usually confronted with resistance by most of the actors profiting
from the existing (unsustainable) arrangements or regimes (e.g. legal or political hurdles,
missing finance and initial customer support). Following this line of thought has inspired an
entirely new research field of ecopreneurship (Schaltegger, 2002) and sustainable
entrepreneurship (Cohen and Winn, 2007; Hall et al., 2010; Hockerts and Wu
¨stenhagen,
2010; Larson, 2000; Plieth et al., 2012; Schaltegger and Wagner, 2011).
Following Schumpeter,the ‘ ‘entrepreneurial function’’ is not limited to the owner or founder of
a business – rather it is a person or even a group of cooperating individuals successfully
PAGE 584
j
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
j
VOL. 13 NO. 5 2013

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT