What Types of Policy Uncertainties Matter for Business?
Author | Masayuki Morikawa |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12196 |
Date | 01 December 2016 |
Published date | 01 December 2016 |
WHAT TYPES OF POLICY UNCERTAINTIES MATTER
FOR BUSINESS?
MASAYUKI MORIKAWA*Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry
(RIETI)
Abstract. This paper reports data from the author’s original survey of Japanese companies concerning
the distributions on subjectiveuncertainties over economic policies and their effects on business oper-
ations. Companies perceive uncertainty over the future course of certain economic policies, such as
the social security system and internationaltrade policy. Policy uncertainty regarding the tax system,
trade policy and environmental policy can have substantialeffects on managerial decisions, especially
on equipment investment and overseasactivities. According to the companies’subjective probability
distributions on their sales outlook, manufacturers face greater uncertainty than non-manufacturing
companiesdo. Uncertainty over economic policies substantiallyreduces the expected sales growth rate.
1. INTRODUCTION
A large number of theoretical and empirical studies have been conducted on the
negative impacts of uncertainty on the real economy. While uncertainty about
the future economy arises for various reasons, unstable politics and unpredict-
able policies are important sources of uncertainty. Recent studies indicate that
policy uncertainty has a substantial negative impact on the real economy. These
studies depend on a single aggregated proxy measure of policy uncertainty. This
is, however, unsatisfactory because the behaviour of economic agents is affected
by various types of policy uncertainties at one time on, for example, corporate
tax, international trade, social security and labour market policies.
The first contribution of this study is to build a new data set. This data set cap-
tures the relationship between uncertainties over a variety of economic policies
and their impacts on managerial decisions, which has not been attempted in
the existing literature. Another feature of this data set is that it captures a com-
pany manager’s view on point estimates for sales outlook as well as the man-
ager’s individual belief on the distribution of future sales. More specifically,
this study asks about subjective 90% confidence intervals on sales outlook along
with point outlook for the subsequent year and the 3-year average.1
As the second contribution, the data design of this paper shows that different
policy uncertainties influence different companies’managerial decisions, thereby
*Address for Correspondence: Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI), 1-3-1
Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8901, Japan. E-mail: morikawa-masayuki@rieti.go.jp. This
paper is a revised version of my discussion paper (Morikawa, 2013). The author would like to
thank the editor, an anonymous reviewer, Masahisa Fujita, Arata Ito, Minoru Kaneko, Satoshi
Miura, Atsushi Nakajima, Keiichiro Oda, Munehisa Yamashiro, Isamu Yamauchi, and the seminar
participants at RIETI for their helpful comments and suggestions. The views expressed in this paper
are my own and do not represent those of REITI. This research is supported by the JSPS Grants-in-
Aid for Scientific Research (23330101, 26590043).
1See Guiso and Parigi (1999) and Bontempi et al. (2010) for studies that adopt data with a similar
design.
Pacific Economic Review, 21: 5 (2016) pp. 527–540
doi: 10.1111/1468-0106.12196
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
bs_bs_banner
To continue reading
Request your trial