What role does CEO vision play in the internationalization process of firms? Evidence from the banking sector in Africa

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21958
AuthorSimona Gentile‐Lüdecke,Tilo Halaszovich,Sarianna Lundan
Date01 January 2019
Published date01 January 2019
THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF AFRICAN FIRMS
What role does CEO vision play in the internationalization
process of firms? Evidence from the banking sector in Africa
Simona Gentile-Lüdecke
1
| Tilo Halaszovich
2
| Sarianna Lundan
1
1
University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
2
Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Correspondence
Simona Gentile-Lüdecke, Faculty of Business
Studies and Economics, Hochschulring
4, 28359 Bremen, Germany
Email: simona.gentile@uni-bremen.de
This study examines the cross-border expansion of four major African banks from 1988 to
2014 in order to investigate the role of CEO vision in influencing their international investment
decisions. The qualitative case study approach is complemented by a quantitative analysis that
examines the multiple factors influencing internationalization patterns. The results from both
types of analysis indicate that the vision of the CEO matters, and that it is a key factor in
explaining the accelerated internationalization of three of the four banks examined in this
study. These results stress the need for considering managerial decision making in international
resource commitment decisions, particularly in an emerging market context, where a shared
developmental vision might be shaping the behavior of the entrepreneurs.
1|INTRODUCTION
Since the 1990s, sub-Saharan Africa has been among the world's
fastest growing regions, and the acceleration in economic growth has
been accompanied by an expansion of access to financial services
across the continent (Barbarinde, 2009; European Investment Bank
[EIB], 2013; Mecagni, Marchettini, & Maino, 2015). Recent periods of
financial liberalization and institutional as well as regulatory upgrading
have changed the face of the financial systems across the region
(Adams, Debrah, Williams, & Mmieh, 2015; Beck & Cull, 2013), which
have traditionally been subject to restrictive regulations and domi-
nated by European and U.S. banks (Adams, Debrah, Williams, &
Mmieh, 2014).
Over the past decade, African-based banks have been expanding
across the continent, reflecting a general increase in intra-African for-
eign direct investment (FDI) (Amankwah-Amoah, 2014; Krüger &
Strauss, 2015), and pan-African banking groups with significant cross-
border networks have emerged (Beck, Fuchs, Singer, & Witte, 2015;
International Monetary Fund [IMF], 2015; United Nations Confer-
ence on Trade and Development [UNCTAD], 2015). The cross-border
expansion of African banks has increased 10-fold since the 1990s,
but the exponential growth of their regional operations started in the
mid-2000s (Boojihawon & Acholonu, 2013; IMF, 2015). This develop-
ment not only provides an appropriate setting for our investigation
examining the role of CEO vision, but it also allows us to respond to
the recent calls to bring Africa into the research agenda (Nwankwo,
2012) as Africa offers great potential as a context for management
research, and more empirical and conceptual work is warranted to
explain the richness of the opportunities on the African continent
and address the challenges within them(Georg, Corbishley, Khayesi,
Haas, & Tihanyi, 2016, p. 389).
Internationalization decisions are an essential part of the strate-
gic challenges faced by firms, since they often involve significant
resource commitments (Schotter & Beamish, 2013). This is the case
not only for manufacturing firms but also for financial service compa-
nies (Grant & Venzin, 2009), since service production and consump-
tion often happen simultaneously, and internationalization is
conducted through FDI, ensuring a high level of control in host mar-
kets, but also entailing a higher level of risk. In financial services,
moreover, internationalization is subject to stricter regulation than in
many parts of the manufacturing sector, since banks are subject to
both high levels of entry control and postentry performance controls
(Engwall & Hadjikhani, 2014).
The international business literature has tended to view interna-
tional commitment decisions purely in economically rational terms,
leaving limited or no room for decision-making on the part of the
managers(Aharoni, Tihanyi, & Connelly, 2011, p. 135). In the Upp-
sala international process model (Johanson & Vahlne, 1977), manage-
rial decision making is present, but it is the accumulation of
experience that primarily influences the pattern of internationaliza-
tion. Overall, the focus of much of the internationalization literature
has been on the incremental explanations that emphasize path
dependency and on explanations emphasizing external factors, that
DOI: 10.1002/tie.21958
Thunderbird International Business Review. 2019;61:1327. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tie © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 13

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT