Wealth‐to‐Income Ratio and Stock Market Movements: Evidence from a Nonparametric Causality Test

Published date01 September 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12136
AuthorMark E. Wohar,Mehmet Balcilar,Ricardo M. Sousa,Rangan Gupta
Date01 September 2018
Wealth-to-Income Ratio and Stock
Market Movements: Evidence from a
Nonparametric Causality Test
MEHMET BALCILAR
,
,RANGAN GUPTA
§
,RICARDO M. SOUSA
¶,††
AND
MARK E. WOHAR
‡‡,§§
Eastern Mediterranian University, Famagusta, North Cyprus, Turkey,
Montpellier Business School, Montpellier, France,
§
University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,
University of Minho, Braga, Portugal,
††
LSE Alumni Association, London, UK,
‡‡
University of Nebraska-Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA and
§§
Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
ABSTRACT
We use a nonparametric causality-in-quantile test to analyze the predictive
ability of the wealth-to-income ratio (wy) for excess stock returns and their
volatility.Our results reveal that the wy is nonlinearly related with excess stock
returns, and hence, results from linear Granger causality tests cannot be
deemed robust. When we apply the nonparametric causality-in-quantile test,
we nd that the wy can predict excess stock returns over the majority of the
conditional distribution, with the exception being the extreme ends, that is,
when the market is in deep bear or bull phases. However, the wy has no
predictability for the volatility of excess stock returns.
JEL Codes: C22; G10
I. INTRODUCTION
The seminal paper by Lettau and Ludvigson (2001) was the predecessor of a
sequence of works investigating the link between the consumption-wealth
ratio (denoted by cay) and risk premium, including stock and bond returns
in both developed and developing markets (Afonso and Sousa 2011; Rocha
Armada and Sousa 2012; Rapach and Zhou 2013; Sousa 2010a, 2015; Caporale
et al. 2016).
A recent work of Sousa (2015) has made a substantial contribution to the
empirical nance literature. The author develops a very simple theoretical model
that shows that falls in asset wealth are equivalent to a destruction of collateral or
a reduction in utility services. As a result, when hit by negative shocks, investors
become more exposed to labor income risk and demand a larger risk premium on
© 2017 International Review of Finance Ltd. 2017
International Review of Finance, 2017
DOI: 10.1111/ir.12136
International Review of Finance, 18:3, 2018: pp. 495–506
DOI:10.1111/irfi.12136
© 2017 International Review of Finance Ltd. 2017

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT