Using importance–performance analysis, goal difficulty and the Kano model to prioritize improvements in the quality of home delivery logistics services

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-12-2020-0491
Published date07 October 2021
Date07 October 2021
Pages477-498
Subject MatterManagement science & operations,Logistics
AuthorKai-Chieh Hu,Kai-Chieh Chia,Mingying Lu,Ya-Lan Liang
Using importanceperformance
analysis, goal difficulty and the
Kano model to prioritize
improvements in the quality of
home delivery logistics services
Kai-Chieh Hu and Kai-Chieh Chia
Department of Business Administration, Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan
Mingying Lu
School of Big Data Management, Soochow UniversityWaishuanghsi Campus,
Taipei, Taiwan, and
Ya-Lan Liang
Department of Business Administration, Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of the study is to clarify the quality of home delivery logistics services from the
perspectives of customers and provide insight to aid the prioritization of service quality improvements and
guide managerial strategic planning.
Design/methodology/approach The study used a three-dimensional model that integrated Kano model,
goal difficulty (GD) and importanceperformance analysis (IPA) for investigating service quality aspects
emphasized by customers and determine which attributes should be prioritized according to an enterprises
resource and capability constraints. Data were collected through questionnaires administered to the customers
and managers of five primary home delivery logistics service enterprises and six small to medium-sized
enterprises in Taiwan. Improving the quality of home delivery logistics services has become of increased
interest for enterprises.
FindingsThe three most important attributes,ranked in order of priorityfor improvement,were the protection
of customerspersonal information, delivery of products without damage and reasonable compensation
standardsfor product damage. The studyconcludes that enterprises shouldprioritize the improvementof these
attributes. Implications, detailed explanations and directionsfor further investigations are also proposed.
Originality/value The study discusses the importance and relevant satisfaction levels of service quality
attributes from the perspective of customers while also considering the limitations of companiesresources and
capabilities. The results indicate that the method can be used to identify service quality attributes of home
delivery logistics and formulate strategies for enhancing customer satisfaction.
Keywords Logistics service quality, Importanceperformance analysis, Home delivery logistics,
Goal difficulty, Kano model
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
Withrecent developmentsin online shopping ande-commerce (electroniccommerce), numerous
business opportunities in home delivery logistics have emerged (A
cimovi
cet al., 2020). Home
deliverylogistics (or door-to-doorservices) ine-retail (electronic retail)is a type of business-to-
consumer service inwhich a logistics company is hired by a sender to transport an item to a
recipient. Home delivery logistics has become increasingly critical for the service industry,
and the demand for such services has risen (Lee and Whang, 2001;Liao and Lou, 2013).
Quality of
home delivery
logistics
services
477
This paper forms part of a special section Resilient supply chains through innovative logistics
management, guest edited by Peggy S. Chen and Jiangang Fei.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/0957-4093.htm
Received 24 December 2020
Revised 17 May 2021
20 August 2021
Accepted 22 September 2021
The International Journal of
Logistics Management
Vol. 33 No. 2, 2022
pp. 477-498
© Emerald Publishing Limited
0957-4093
DOI 10.1108/IJLM-12-2020-0491
In the contextof logistics, service qualityand environmental sustainability are associatedwith
improvedoperating performance,greater revenue and higher cashflows (Garc
ıa-Dastugueand
Eroglu, 2019). However, service quality has a greater effect on operating performance than
environmental sustainability. Studies have demonstrated that logistics service quality is
positively associated with consumer satisfaction and further affects consumer loyalty
(Daugherty et al., 1998;Li and Dinlersoz, 2012;Goethals et al., 2011). To attract customers,
sustain customer loyalty and maintain market competitiveness, home delivery logistics
companiesmust enhance customer satisfaction(Huang et al., 2018;Hsuet al.,2011;Wang etal.,
2016). Home deliverylogistics companies that neglectservice quality risk customerchurn and
profit reductions.
Most delivery service corporations maintain a certain level of service quality. From the
perspective of business management, enhancing service quality to attract customers and
ensuring their satisfaction is a pivotal goal for home delivery logistics companies (Chen
et al., 2018a).Indeed,consumersatisfactionispositivelycorrelatedwiththequalityof
services (Bei and Chiao, 2001). In other words, from a one-dimensional perspective,
consumer satisfaction is enhanced by high-quality service. Offering a more comprehensive
perspective, Kano et al. (1984) observed that service quality was not linearly correlated with
consumer satisfaction. They classified service quality according to five categories, namely
one-dimensional attribute (O), attractive attribute (A), must-be attribute (M), indifferent
attribute (I) and reverse attribute (R). On the other hand, service quality attributes targeted
for improvement are often prioritized using IPA, which is involves the use of four-quadrant
matrix (Martilla and James, 1977;Yeo, 2003). This type of analysis enables the use of
customer feedback to determine which attributes of service quality to prioritize. Combining
IPA with the Kano model could aid the formulation of strategies for improving service
quality (Hu and Lee, 2017).
The information examined through Kano model or IPA, however, solely reflects the views
of customers; thus, it confers only referential value for analyzing market demand.
Administrators seeking to improve their strategies are limited by resources and
capabilities. They must possess an understanding of what aspects of service quality to
focus on improving while considering the challenge involved in the implementation of such
improvements (Hu and Lee, 2017;Steer, 1976). These developments can be regarded as
business goals, where GD refers to the level of difficulty involved in accomplishing the goal
(Kenis, 1979). The extent of the skills or resources required to improve a particular aspect is
positively correlated with the difficulty of achieving improvement (Dunbar, 1971;Kenis,
1979). Accordingly, Hu and Lee (2017) developed a Kano modelIPAGD analytical
framework as an evaluation indicator to identify strategies for improving service quality.
Studies on the quality of home delivery logistics services have focused on evaluating
customerperceptions or on developingdimensions and attributes(Amorim et al., 2020;Mentzer
et al., 1999).In operation and management,businesses offering home deliverylogistics services
must satisfy delivery expectations and service quality requirements while adhering to the
constraints of the operating environment and other external factors. These restrictions are
crucialconsiderations for logisticsservice providers. Thus,the present study applied the three-
dimensional model developed by Hu and Lee (2017) to examine and discuss strategies for
prioritizing attributes of home delivery logistics service quality for improvement. The main
contributionof this study is thatit incorporates the viewsof logistics operatorsin analyzing the
prioritizationof such improvementsfor improvement.The results can offer practicalassistance
for enhancing the quality of home delivery logistics services. A survey of customers and
managers of relevant companies was conducted for data collection. Next, a framework
integrating the Kano model, IPA and GD analysis was developed to reveal service quality
aspects concerning customers and managers. The findings serve as a practical reference for
enhancing the qualityof home delivery logistics services.
IJLM
33,2
478

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT