Understanding cross‐border mergers and acquisitions of African firms: The role of dynamic capabilities in enabling competitiveness amidst contextual constraints

AuthorTaina Eriksson,William Y. Degbey,Peter Rodgers,Nnamdi Oguji
Published date01 January 2021
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22138
Date01 January 2021
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Understanding cross-border mergers and acquisitions of
African firms: The role of dynamic capabilities in enabling
competitiveness amidst contextual constraints
William Y. Degbey
1
| Taina Eriksson
2
| Peter Rodgers
3
| Nnamdi Oguji
4
1
Department of Marketing and International
Business, Turku School of Economics,
University of Turku, Turku, Finland
2
Centre for Collaborative Research (CCR),
Turku School of Economics, University of
Turku, Turku, Finland
3
School of Business, University of Leicester,
Leicester, UK
4
Department of Marketing, University of
Vaasa, Vaasa, Finland
Correspondence
William Y. Degbey, Department of Marketing
and International Business, Turku School of
Economics, University of Turku, Turun
Yliopisto, Turku FI-20014, Finland.
Email: william.degbey@utu.fi
Abstract
This article builds on existing international business literature that examines the
drivers of cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As) within emerging and devel-
oping economy contexts, theoretically exploring how dynamic capabilities (DCs) are
connected to these drivers, and how African emerging multinational enterprises
(EMNEs) can pursue them to achieve competitiveness. The article's contribution is
the development of a DC framework and testable propositions for African EMNEs'
cross-border M&As. The theoretical framework shows the division of DC
dimensionssensing, seizing, and transformingand establishes explanations for
their linkage with institutional and resource drivers for African EMNEs' cross-border
M&A competitiveness. In addition, the article outlines managerial implications to this
effect. Overall, the article contributes to the emerging literature on the international
expansion of African EMNEs through cross-border M&As by underscoring the role
of DCs.
KEYWORDS
African firms, dynamic capabilities, emerging multinational enterprises, internationalization,
mergers and acquisitions
1|INTRODUCTION
Research shows that mergers and acquisitions (M&As), especially
cross-border ones, have become a fundamental international growth
strategy for many firms from emerging or developing economies
(Degbey & Ellis, 2017, 2019; Liou & Rao-Nicholson, 2017; Oguji &
Owusu, 2017; Peng, 2012). At the same time, while African countries
have experienced dramatic economic growth in recent years, interna-
tional business (IB) research attention on Africa has also been growing
owing to the marked rise in the cross-border economic activities of
African firms (Boso, Adeleye, & White, 2016; Ibeh, Wilson, &
Chizema, 2012; Oguji, Degbey, & Owusu, 2018).
Despite this progress, the extant literature on the effective man-
agement of African firmsan important source of competitiveness
has far better informed us about the challenges confronting these
organizations or firms than how they actually achieve competitiveness
(Mellahi & Mol, 2015). Scholars identify the liability of Africanness
(Ngwu, Adeleye, & Ogbechie, 2015) as a challenge, which confronts
internationalizing African firms as they struggle to compete with hith-
erto dominant Western multinationals, not only in foreign markets,
but also in markets within the African continent. In addition, the IB lit-
erature identifies other challenges such as global competitiveness, lim-
ited management capabilities, and inadequate cross-cultural
capabilities (Boso, Adeleye, Ibeh, & Chizema, 2018). In an exploratory
DOI: 10.1002/tie.22138
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reprodu ction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2020 The Authors. Thunderbird International Business Review published by Wiley Periodicals LLC
Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 2021;63:7793. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tie 77
study of three failed internationalization cases of South African firms,
Ajai (2015) found that ineffective handling of strategy, management,
and organizational issues contributed to these firms' failure rather
than external factors. Furthermore, scholars identify the challenge of
the global competitiveness of African firms to span the national, sec-
toral, and firm levels (Adeleye & Esposito, 2018). They argue that the
lack of competitiveness centers on issues such as limited economies
of scale and a relatively poor quality of service (Amankwah-Amoah,-
2018), liabilities of smallness and newness (Ngwu et al., 2015), as well
as infrastructural, skills, and regulatory deficits (Newman et al., 2016).
Furthermore, research has revealed that cross-border M&As have
become the most preferred internationalization mode for emerging
multinational enterprises (EMNEs) (Aybar & Ficici, 2009; Liou & Rao-
Nicholson, 2017). Yet, unlike the mainstream M&A literature
(Haleblian, Devers, McNamara, Carpenter, & Davison, 2009), there is
a lack of research directly examining the drivers and outcomes of the
internationalization of African firms (Boso et al., 2018). This again
highlights that the dominant focus on the contextual constraints
(or challenges) of these firms has taken our attention away from
equally focusing on how they effectively manage to achieve competi-
tiveness in international markets. Similarly, Mellahi and Mol (2015)
and others (Liou & Rao-Nicholson, 2017; Zoogah, Peng, &
Woldu, 2015) note that we know very little about these African firms,
and consequently, theoretical explanations of what drives them to
compete internationally and how they deploy their domestic compe-
tencies to operate outside their home markets remain elusive.
While the extant literature has underscored the importance and
dominance of contextual constraints or challenges to African firms'
competitiveness in international markets, we argue that scholars need
to move from simply focusing on the challenges these African firms
face to also including factors that help provide theoretical explana-
tions for their competitiveness in international markets. We argue that
while context is important to ascertain the constraints on these Afri-
can firms, it is also important to explore how these firms are able to
develop competitiveness amidst these challenges. We anchor our dis-
cussions in this article to the theoretical building blocks of institutions
and organizational resources (Zoogah et al., 2015) and to the dynamic
capability (DC) approach/conceptualization (Teece, 2007, 2009;
Teece & Pisano, 1994; Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997).
Zoogah et al. (2015) note that the effectiveness of
organizationswhich encompasses outcomes such as
competitivenessfrom the African environment is influenced by
(a) the high uncertainty of the African context; (b) the increasing influx
of diverse private, public, and nongovernmental (third-sector) organi-
zations; (c) the interconnectedness of the formal and informal econo-
mies; and (d) a growing number of African countries transitioning from
socialism to capitalism. Additionally, Lebedev, Peng, Xie, and Ste-
vens (2015) identified the determinants of M&As in and out of emerg-
ing economies, including additional new determinants pertaining to
emerging economies (i.e., institutions, national pride, and latecomer
disadvantage), and that these determinants equally affected
internationalizing African firms as they are transitioning and emerging
economy firms. Zoogah et al. (2015) proposed institutions and organi-
zational resources as two key theoretical building blocks to examine
the effectiveness of African firms, while also noting that not all African
firms can effectively match their firms' resources to absorb the learn-
ing opportunities provided in the international/developed markets
(Liou & Rao-Nicholson, 2017). Similarly, from the viewpoint of M&As
undertaken by emerging economy firms, Lebedev et al. (2015) identi-
fied how the new determinants noted earlier can be linked to the two
theoretical building blocks of institutions and organizational resources
proposed by Zoogah et al. (2015). Yet, some of these African firms
pursuing cross-border M&As lack the capacity to dynamically deploy
resources to take advantage of the learning opportunities in target
international markets (Zoogah et al., 2015). This indicates that African
firms that continue not only to survive but also to thrive require cer-
tain capabilities in order to continue to deploy their firms' resources
and drive growth. Consistent with this assertion, a recent Special Issue
Editorial underscores the importance of capabilities in the life of Afri-
can firms and poses the following two crucial questions: What kinds
ofcapabilities do African firms need to internationalize rapidly? Do
African firms possesscapabilities that give them a competitive
advantage over firms from outside the continent?(Boso
et al., 2018, p. 6).
We contribute to this discussion by proposing that the DC
approach is needed as an additional theoretical building block to
address both the Africa n firms' contextual co nstraints and the M&A
determinants that lead them to achieving competitiveness in their
cross-border M&A end eavors. Thus, we seek to extend the theo reti-
cal building blocks o f institutions and reso urces to effectivel y align
them to accumulate, utilize, integrate, and reconfigure the resource
base afforded in international markets (Eriksson, 2014;
Teece, 2014). DCsthe ability of the firm to integrate, build, and
reconfigure internal an d external resource conf igurations to address
rapidly changing environments (Teece, 2014; Teece et al., 1997)
provide theoretical explanations for the drivers of these firms' inter-
national expansion a nd their competitiv e advantage. Our appr oach
to DCs is consistent with the seminal ideas of Teece et al. (1997),
who conceptualize DCs as a focal element in facilitating the differen-
tial performance of organizations under conditions of change. There-
fore, the focus on DCs i n this study aligns w ith M&As, which are
indeed characteriz ed as change events (Degb ey &
Pelto, 2013, 2015). C onsequently, we seek to t heoretically addre ss
our core research ques tion: How do DCs enhance the competitivene ss
of EMNEs from Africa t hrough cross-borde r M&As? The growing body
of literature on EMNEs purports that these firms prefer cross-border
M&As as their predominant foreign direct investment (FDI) mode
because it helps them in catching up with peers from mature,
advanced economies (Awate, Larsen, & Mudambi, 2012; Ibeh,
Uduma, Makhmadshoev, & Madichie, 2018; Mathews, 2002), and in
aiding them to augment strategic assets required to build competi-
tive advantage and enh ance value creatio n (Degbey, 2016a;
78 DEGBEY ET AL.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT