Underpinning the benefits of green banking: A comparative study between Islamic and conventional banks in Bangladesh

Date01 September 2019
AuthorKashfia Sharmeen,Mohammad Dulal Miah,Rashedul Hasan
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22031
Published date01 September 2019
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Underpinning the benefits of green banking: A comparative
study between Islamic and conventional banks in Bangladesh
Kashfia Sharmeen
1
| Rashedul Hasan
2
| Mohammad Dulal Miah
3
1
Department of Finance, Bangladesh Institute
of Capital Market (BICM), Dhaka, Bangladesh
2
School of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of
Business, Hospitality and Humanities, Nilai
University, Nilai, Malaysia
3
Department of Economics and Finance,
University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Oman
Correspondence
Rashedul Hasan, School of Accounting and
Finance, Faculty of Business, Nilai University,
No 1, Persiaran Universiti, Putra Nilai, 71800
Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Email: rashedul@nilai.edu.my
This study aims to compare environmental motives and performance of conventional and Islamic
banks in Bangladesh. Green compliance index was developed based on the Bangladesh Bank
(the central bank of Bangladesh) guidelines whereas information regarding governance variables
is collected from the annual reports of 9 Islamic and 31 conventional banks. Results show
Islamic banks are more environmentally friendly compared to their conventional counterparts.
Board size is negatively related to green compliance whereas board independence and auditor's
type do not have any significant influence on green compliance for both clusters of banks. Com-
pliance with green banking policies enhances the reputation for Islamic banks and accountability
and profitability for conventional banks. Results of this study provide useful information for reg-
ulatory authorities to formulate policies that are conducive to enhance bank's environmental
performance.
KEYWORDS
carbon emission, corporate social responsibility, environmental performance, governance,
green banking
1|INTRODUCTION
The world at large is experiencing devastating effects of the global cli-
mate crisis including droughts, floods, tsunami, water scarcity, rising
sea level, and the resulting demographic shifts. These consequences
of climate change threaten the sustainable living on this planet, which
calls for an urgent and collective response from both developed and
developing countries. Sir Nicholas Stern has already warned green-
house gas (GHG) emissions can be reduced to a stable level by spend-
ing merely 1 % of the global gross domestic product (GDP) if actions
are taken immediately; however, maintaining the same level would
require around 520% of the global GDP if mitigating strategies are
not articulated and adopted soon (Stern, 2007). This entails an effec-
tive response toward climate crisis is an urgent issue that requires
concerted efforts from all segments of the economy.
Financial institutions, particularly banks, can accelerate the move-
ment of a clean world to a large extent. For instance, these institutions
can implement a go-greenpolicy for themselves and encourage cli-
ent firms to adopt clean technology. In the long term, this strategy is
expected to be favorable for firms, to reduce the cost and induce the
access to the new market. As per their interest, banks should follow
the carbon footprint of their clients or projects to ensure overall sus-
tainability. Nieto (2017) estimates loan exposure to higher environ-
mental risk sectors in the United States, European Union, China,
Japan, and Switzerland amounts to US$1.6 trillion. Any unfavorable
changes in these sectors may result in financial shocks. This urges
banks to carefully consider clients' or projects' risk stemming from cli-
mate change and regularly disclose carbon footprint resulting from
their own operations.
Banks' environmental performance varies as they do not have
proper knowledge about the benefits they might receive through
implementing green finance. Thus, it is essential to unfold the underly-
ing benefits of green banking for the greater interest of the planet. A
good volume of studies has explained the environmental performance
of banks and its determinants. However, most of these studies include
environmental disclosure to corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Moreover, these studies mainly focus on developed economies (see
e.g., Branco & Rodrigues, 2008; Douglas, Doris, & Johnson, 2004;
El-Bannany, 2007; Jizi, Salama, Dixon, & Stratling, 2014; Menassa &
Brodhäcker, 2017; Nobanee & Ellili, 2016; Thompson & Cowton,
2004; Weber, 2012) whereas the academia and policymakers should
render more attention toward environmental issues of developing
DOI: 10.1002/tie.22031
Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 2019;61:735744. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tie © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 735

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT