Unconventional monetary policy in the Asian financial crisis
Date | 01 February 2018 |
Author | Joseph Gagnon,Tamim Bayoumi |
Published date | 01 February 2018 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12254 |
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE
Unconventional monetary policy in the Asian
financial crisis
†
Tamim Bayoumi
1
| Joseph Gagnon
2
1
International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC
2
Peterson Institute for International Economics,
Washington, DC
Correspondence
Gagnon 1750 Massachusetts Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20036, USA
Email: jgagnon@piie.com
Abstract
Some of the policies central banks used during the Asian
Financial Crisis had elements of unconventional monetary
policy in that they involved the government buying assets
that the private sector was unwilling to hold. We focus
on public funding of bank recapitalizations in Thailand
and the extraordinary purchase of equities in Hong Kong.
Although it is important to calibrate these policies appro-
priately, we believe they helped to stabilize economies
through channels that were not well understood at the
time of the Asian crisis.
1|INTRODUCTION
During and immediately after the Asian financial crisis of 1997–1998, western economists
placed most of the blame on structural flaws in Asian economies and financial systems, led by
staff at the International Monetary Fund (IMF); accordingly, they focused their policy recom-
mendations on measures to address these flaws. Policy-makers in the affected economies argued
that volatile and destabilizing financial flows were at least partly to blame, but these complaints
did not arouse much sympathy in a policy community in the thrall of the efficient markets
hypothesis. In the aftermath of the North Atlantic financial crisis of 2008, western economists
are far more empathetic to the view that financial markets may not be efficient and may, in fact,
be destabilizing.
One of the key policies used in advanced economies after the North Atlantic crisis was a form
of unconventional monetary policy known as quantitative easing (QE). QE involves large-scale cen-
tral bank purchases of long-term bonds and other nontraditional assets. QE works precisely because
the assets being purchased are not close substitutes for money or short-term risk-free debt. In other
words, QE relies on inefficiency in financial markets.
†
Bayoumi wrote this paper while on sabbatical from the International Monetary Fund at the Peterson Institute. Views
expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the International Monetary Fund, the Peterson Institute or other
members of their staffs.
Received: 1 December 2016 Accepted: 1 April 2017
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0106.12254
© 2018 Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI)
Pacific Economic Review © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
80 wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/paer Pacific Economic Review. 2018;23:80–94.
To continue reading
Request your trial