The Validity of Investor Sentiment Proxies

AuthorRobert B. Durand,Joyce Khuu,Lee A. Smales,Felix Chan
Published date01 September 2017
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12102
Date01 September 2017
The Validity of Investor Sentiment
Proxies*
FELIX CHAN,ROBERT B. DURAND,JOYCE KHUU AND LEE A. SMALES
School of Economics and Finance, Curtin University,Perth, Western Australia, Australia
ABSTRACT
Behavioral nance research relies on proxies for unobservable phenomena.
Different proxies for the same underlying phenomena should be correlated
(formal proof of this proposition is presented in this letter). This letter exam-
ines proxies for an unobservable variable, sentiment. We utilize a well-
known methodology to construct text-based sentiment proxies and compare
these with metrics from Baker and Wurgler. We nd that they are not corre-
lated. At least one, but perhaps all, of these are not valid proxies of sentiment.
JEL Codes: G02; G12
I. INTRODUCTION
Sound proxies should have a strong positive correlation with the unobserved true
variable (Krasker and Pratt 1986). Where different proxies might represent the
same underlying phenomenon, these different proxies should be correlated with
each other (see Proposition 1).
Investor sentiment is important in empirical nance (Baker and Wurgler 2006,
2007; Tetlock 2007; Yu and Yuan 2011; Baker et al. 2012; García 2013; Smales
2014), yet sentiment cannot be measured directly. Therefore, we cannot consider
the soundness of these proxies by nding their correlation with unobservable in-
vestment sentiment. We can, however, consider their correlation with each
other.
We consider methodologies to proxy investor sentiment in empirical Finance.
We nd that proxies for sentiment obtained using these methodologies are not
correlated. Therefore, at least one of these methodologies produces invalid prox-
ies for investor sentiment.
II. SENTIMENT PROXIES
Baker and Wurgler (2006, 2007) utilize a top downapproach using market and
macroeconomic variables to proxy market sentiment. Their sentiment index,
* We are grateful for comments made by seminar participants at Curtin University and an anony-
mous referee.
© 2016 International Review of Finance Ltd. 2016
International Review of Finance, 17:3, 2017: pp. 473477
DOI: 10.1111/ir.12102

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT