The US–Cuba Policy Shift as Viewed by The New York Times: A Critical Analysis from the Island

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.13169/intejcubastud.9.2.0180
Published date01 December 2017
Date01 December 2017
Pages180-195
AuthorYoan Karell Acosta González
Subject MatterUS Cuba policy,ideology,CDA, NYT
InternatIonal Journal of Cuban StudIeS 9.2 WInter 2017
ACADEMIC ARTICLE
THE US–CUBA POLICY SHIFT AS VIEWED
BY THE NEW YORK TIMES: A CRITICAL
ANALYSIS FROM THE ISLAND
Yoan Karell Acosta González
University of Havana, Cuba
Abstract
This article is the result of critical discourse analysis (CDA) research on a corpus of 190
articles published by The New York Times (NYT) on Cuba, in the crucial period between
17 December 2014 (17D) and 28 December 2015, that is, over the first year after the
beginning of the new US Cuba policy. In an attempt to help understand the complex
relations between Cuba and the US, the article analyses ideological trends and the way
some controversial issues are discussed by the newspaper.
Keywords: US Cuba policy, ideology, CDA, NYT
Cuba in the US media and some theoretical reference
to consider
Historically, the representation of Cuba in the US mainstream media has been,
at least, highly controversial; very often, it has been, rather, blatant misrepresen-
tation. This historical tendency can be verified in many works written in both
Cuba and the US.1
It is well established that there can be various factors that influence the way
discourse is built. In the case discussed in this article, the importance of two of
them should be highlighted: the context of the historical and present-day bilat-
eral relations between Cuba and the US, as well as the social subjectivity which
encompasses ideology and beliefs, among other components.
tHe uS–Cuba PolICY SHIft aS VIeWed bY THE NEW YORK TIMES 181
IJCS Produced and distributed by Pluto Journals www.plutojournals.com/ijcs/
Throughout the years, the bilateral relations between Cuba and the US have been
characterised, to a great extent, by conflict, which accounts for the use of journalistic
and media discourse in general as a weapon in that confrontation; nonetheless, that
conflict undergoes certain modifications now, after 17 December 2014 (17D).2
With regard to ideology and social subjectivity in the US, it can be useful to
look into the work of Jorge Hernández.3 Although there is a complex ideological
spectrum within the US, often resulting in diverse views in the media, Hernández
has put forth a characterisation of what he regards as the prevailing set of beliefs
and world view of that country’s dominant elite, which includes political, eco-
nomic and mainstream media circles. For example, one of those beliefs is that
capitalism is the ultimate system, of which they are the world leaders, and thus
any attempt anywhere on the planet to provide an alternative is lashed out at
and even considered dangerous to their national security. Other features
described by Hernandez are liberalism, individualism, emphasis on private prop-
erty, a messianic attitude, the manifest destiny, the restriction on the role played
by the State, the conviction that the market and competition play a fundamental
role in the regulation of social relations,4 and the strong belief that the US are a
chosen people, among others. Broadly speaking, Hernández argues, conserva-
tism thrives in the US within a liberal matrix.
The research and brief notes on the methodology used
In this context, we analysed the discourse of The New York Times (NYT) in the
period between 17 December 2014 and 28 December 2015, that is, over the
first year after the beginning of the new US Cuba policy. While conducting the
analysis, a key scientific question has been whether the NYT’s discourse some-
what reflects Hernández’s views on the predominant beliefs in US elite groups.
A total of 190 articles were studied from the NYT website on Cuba.5
It is relevant to analyse the discourse of NYT due to the three reasons listed
below, among others:
This newspaper cleared the way, in the mainstream media, for the new policy,
by publishing a series of editorials that drew attention to the issue and pro-
moted the policy change towards the island.6
Subsequently, NYT has followed up on the evolution of the talks and the
change derived from the new policy, thus becoming a sequential record of the
events and prospects, from the ideological perspective of the journal.
NYT is a very influential newspaper, both in the US and the world.7

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT