The role of time‐varying return forecasts for improving international diversification benefits

Published date01 July 2017
Date01 July 2017
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1578
RESEARCH ARTICLE
The role of timevarying return forecasts for improving
international diversification benefits
Maria del Mar MirallesQuiros
1
| Jose Luis MirallesQuiros
2
1
Financial Economics, Faculty of
Economics, University of Extremaduras, Av.
Elvas s/n, Badajoz 06071, Spain
2
Financial Economics, Faculty of
Economics, University of Extremaduras,
Badajoz, Spain
Correspondence
Maria del Mar MirallesQuiros, Financial
Economics, Faculty of Economics,
University of Extremadura, Av. Elvas s/n,
Badajoz 06071, Spain.
Email: marmiralles@unex.es
JEL Classification: G10; G11; G14
Abstract
The aim of this study is to provide empirical evidence of the international diversifi-
cation benefits obtained employing not only timevarying volatility forecasts but
also timevarying return forecasts from a multivariate approach that considers the
dynamic relationships in return series as well as in volatilities and correlations. To
that end, instead of using market indexes from different investment areas, we
employ exchange trade funds actively traded on the New York Stock Exchange in
recent years. It avoids nonsynchronous problems as well as allowing us to allocate
internationally on a daily basis for which this approach is especially appropriate.
Our overall results show that using this technique, it is possible to obtain economic
gains and outperform the common benchmark strategies, even when the costs asso-
ciated with the daily rebalance of each portfolio are taken into account.
KEYWORDS
developed markets , emerging markets, outofsample evaluation, returnpredictability, volatilitytiming
1|INTRODUCTION
The classical theory of optimal portfolio selection proposed
by Markowitz (1952) states that the correlation structure
across assets is a key feature of the optimization problem
because it determines the riskiness of the investment position.
For that reason, investors usually choose to diversify interna-
tionally and further reduce their portfolio risk assumptions.
However, it is well known that the correlation structure
across assets varies over time and researchers have proposed
various multivariate GARCH specifications to model the
dynamic dependence structure of multivariate time series.
One of the most popular multivariate specifications is the
dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) model proposed by
Engle (2002), which describes the correlation dynamics
among different asset classes and markets.
This line of research has important implications for
investors because it gives them the opportunity to solve the
classical allocation problem with forwardlooking correlation
forecasts obtained from this dynamic correlation model.
Some examples of these empirical applications for
international diversification purposes are those of Jondeau
and Rockinger (2012) and Christofersen et al. (2014). How-
ever, these previous works have only analysed the implica-
tions of volatility timing on international diversification
decisions and have avoided the prediction of expected
returns. The reason for this choice is that there is little infor-
mation content in past variables regarding future returns in
the short term. More precisely, Jondeau and Rockinger
(2012) argue that for such horizons, estimation uncertainty
of predictive regressions may also do more harm than good.
Nevertheless, some authors report evidence that stock
returns are to some extent predictable (DeMiguel, Nogales,
& Uppal, 2014; Marquering & Verbeek, 2004; Pesaran &
Timmerman, 1995; Pesaran & Timmernan, 2000; Solnik,
1993). Moreover, information transmission across markets
has been widely studied (In, Kim, Yoon, & Viney, 2001;
Liu & Pan, 1997; Shin & Soydemir, 2010). More precisely,
these studies have focused on the shortterm interdependence
among stock markets employing vector autoregressive (VAR)
models to capture serial dependence across markets. This
model allows expected returns over every market index to
Received: 13 October 2015 Revised: 12 April 2016 Accepted: 14 March 2017
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.1578
Int J Fin Econ. 2017;22:201215. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/ijfe 201

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT