The multiple institutional constraints facing new Chinese immigrant entrepreneurs in Australia

Date01 July 2019
AuthorFan Liang
Published date01 July 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22047
RESEARCH ARTICLE
The multiple institutional constraints facing new Chinese
immigrant entrepreneurs in Australia
Fan Liang
Tasmanian School of Business and Economics,
University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania,
Australia
Correspondence
Fan Ling, Tasmanian School of Business and
Economics, University of Tasmania, Hobart,
Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Email: fan.liang@utas.edu.au
Drawing on insights from the institutional entrepreneurship literature about changes that occur
under institutional constraints, in-depth interviews with 36 new Chinese immigrant entrepre-
neurs (NCIEs) were conducted in Australia. The findings suggest that NCIEs are not only con-
strained but also enabled to make changes by the regulatory, normative, and cultural-cognitive
forces across Australia and China, thus leading to different practices and a particular distribu-
tional pattern in business activities. This feature distinguishes NCIEs from other segments of
ethnic Chinese entrepreneurs. This study provides an explanation for the changing landscape of
business activities among NCIEs and also identifies an alternative avenue for changes under
institutional constraints. Immigrant entrepreneurs are suggested to not only draw competitive
advantages from their cultural origins and ethnic resources but also engage in both the main-
stream and international markets. An inclusive and supportive regulatory framework is
suggested as a way to facilitate the business growth of immigrant entrepreneurs and revitalize
local economies.
KEYWORDS
Australia, changes, China, multiple institutional constraints, new Chinese immigrant
entrepreneurs (NCIEs)
1|INTRODUCTION
The accelerating trend of immigration and the associated business
activities have now no longer been a pure social but also an economic
and business phenomenon strongly impacting on countries of settle-
ment (Dheer, 2018; Gao, 2013). Research has found that business
activities of immigrant entrepreneurs play an important role in coun-
tries of settlement (Mavoothu, 2009; Wong, 1998). Unfortunately,
much of the existing research on Chinese immigrant entrepreneurs
has focused on their historical and sociocultural features and has, until
recently, neglected their business activities. We know little about how
business activities of Chinese immigrant entrepreneurs have evolved
in countries of settlement (Dheer, 2018; Gao, 2013; Ma, Zhao,
Wang, & Lee, 2013). This study therefore aims to investigate how
practices, which refer to established activity patterns shared by the
actors to provide order and meaning (Jarzabkowski, 2005;
Lounsbury & Crumley, 2007), are formed by Chinese immigrant entre-
preneurs in business activities. The business practices of Chinese
immigrant entrepreneurs will be examined in the context of the
multiple institutional constraints across Australia and China. This
study is expected to provide an alternative explanation for the broad
effects of the multiple institutional constraints on the business prac-
tices of Chinese immigrant entrepreneurs. It is also expected to inform
the decision-making and business management of Chinese immigrant
entrepreneurs in particular and immigrant entrepreneurs in general.
Finally, this study should also benefit policymakers by providing a
deep understanding of the changing landscape of immigrant
businesses.
Chinese immigration has a long history and has fluctuated over
time (Skeldon, 1996). The earliest wave of Chinese immigration, dur-
ing which ethnic Chinese mainly served as hard labor, can be dated
back to the mid-1800s. The second wave of Chinese immigration
began after the end of World War II, when industrial regions, including
North America, Europe, and Australia, gradually relaxed their immigra-
tion policies. Consequently, many Chinese, mainly from Hong Kong,
Taiwan, and Southeastern Asian countries, migrated to those indus-
trial areas.
DOI: 10.1002/tie.22047
Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 2019;61:623633. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tie © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 623

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT