The effects of trade liberalization on skill acquisition: a systematic review

Pages74-95
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-08-2018-0036
Published date14 May 2019
Date14 May 2019
AuthorSharon Zhengyang Sun,Samuel MacIsaac,Buck C. Duclos,Meredith B. Lilly
Subject MatterStrategy
The ef‌fects of trade
liberalization on skill acquisition:
a systematic review
Sharon Zhengyang Sun,Samuel MacIsaac,Buck C. Duclos and
Meredith B. Lilly
Norman Paterson School of International Affairs,
Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Abstract
Purpose The benef‌its of tradeliberalization on upskilling and skill-basedwage premiums for high-skilled
workers have recently been questioned in policy circles, in part because of rising income inequality and
populist movements in developedeconomies such as the USA. The purpose of this paper is to determine the
effects of trade liberalizationon the relative supply and demand for skills.
Design/methodology/approach Through the systematic review of the literature on trade and skill
acquisition,this paper isolates a total of 25 articles published overthe past two decades.
Findings Key f‌indings demonstrate the importance of the relative development of the trading partner,
with more developed countries experiencing higher upskilling, while less developed countries experience
deskilling. Technology, geographic level of analysis, sector and gender were also found to be important
inf‌luenceson human capital acquisition associated with internationaltrade.
Originality/value Overall, the authors f‌ind support for the idea that trade with developing countries
places pressure on low-skill jobsin developed countries but increasesthe demand for educated workers. The
implications of shifts in skills for public policy-making and in terms of the skill premium on wages are
discussed.
Keywords Trade, Skill acquisition, Relative demand for skills, Relative supply of skills,
Skill-biased technological change
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
The benef‌its of globalization offered by trade liberalization are increasingly being
questioned.From concerns over the purportedhollowing out of the middle classto the rise of
anti-tradeand anti-globalization populism, some are questioning the long-termconsequences
of trade on employment, wages and human capital in Western societies. While there is an
extensive literature on the effects of trade on labour market outcomes, much less is known
about how trade liberalization has impacted skill acquisition. How individuals make
educational choices to match the perceived demand for skillsby the market is crucial to our
understandingof how trade is impactingindividuals and theirhouseholds.
JEL classif‌ication F14, F16, F66
The authors gratefully acknowledge research assistance from Fanny Siauw-Soegiarto who
contributed to the study design, data extraction and article assessment. The authors also gratefully
acknowledge assistance from Carleton Universitys Research Support Services on the search strategy
for the systematic review, with additional assistance from Trish OFlaherty. Finally, the authors
would like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments and feedbacks.
JITLP
18,2
74
Received13 August 2018
Revised10 January 2019
26February 2019
Accepted26 February 2019
Journalof International Trade
Lawand Policy
Vol.18 No. 2, 2019
pp. 74-95
© Emerald Publishing Limited
1477-0024
DOI 10.1108/JITLP-08-2018-0036
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/1477-0024.htm
A thorough analysis of the effects of trade on domestic and international skill levels is
essential to appreciate the impacts across heterogeneous population segments and groups.
As the current US administration openly questions the value of trade, dissecting the
differential impacts of trade on domesticlabour markets are of an urgent concern. A deeper
understanding of both the benef‌its and costs of trade, isolatingit from other sectoral shifts
and technologicalchange, can shed light on future trade policy decisions.
As a country engages in increased trade, it should expect to incur shifts in the relative
demand for skills and educational attainment amongst its workers and f‌irms (Tolbert and
Sizer, 1996;Owen, 1999;Tsen,2007;Haq and Luqman, 2014;Autor et al.,2015;Atkin, 2016;
Greenland and Lopresti, 2016). Whetherthe opening of borders through trade liberalization
leads to more or less relative demand for skilled workers is, thus, an essential question in
addressing the relative supply of skilled labour.Of equal importance is the question of how
changes in trade openness may impact wage premiums when examining the scarce supply
of skilled labour.
The purpose of this article is to determinethe effects of trade, as opposed to those related
to technological change, on the relative supply and demand for skills. This article presents
the f‌indings of a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature on the effects of trade
liberalization on the relative supply and demand for skills. The review addresses two sub-
questions:
Q1. How does trade liberalization alter skill acquisition through the relative supply of
skilled labour?
Q2. How does trade inf‌luence the relative demand for skills?
A systematic literature review lends itself well to situating this issue within the economic
literature and addressesthis still nascent policy topic.
To our knowledge, no systematic review exists on this subject and this article isthe f‌irst
to synthesize this body of research using this specif‌ic research methodology. Previous
studies focusing on inequality also tackle the issue of wage premium (Goldberg and
Pavcnik, 2007). However, the current systematic review focuses more narrowly on skill
acquisition in the empiricalliterature.
Given considerable heterogeneity across countries and economic sectors, in addition to
the complexity of disentanglingthe effects of trade from those of technology, understanding
the impacts of trade on human capital can be challenging.Not only are trade and technology
effects diff‌icult to isolate, but the potential interaction in developing countries between
technological spill-overs and capital-intensive imports complicates our research question.
Furthermore, the trade impacts alone vary across borders and sectors, with some
individuals upskilling to maximize their welfare and others deskilling where employment
reaps greater benef‌its. This article serves as a guide to reframe current debates on the
elements that have shaped the relative supply and demand for skills over the past decades
through a critical analysis of the literature. This article proceeds as follows. We brief‌ly
outline key theoretical issues underlying the debate and describe the methods applied to
address the research questions, followed by a synthesis of the results and policy
implications derivedfrom the interpretation of the f‌indings.
2. Theoretical framework
The seminal work by Findlay and Kierzkowski (1983) introduced a simple general
equilibrium model, which analyzedthe effects of human capital formation as a consequence
of both trade openness and tariff removal. Findlay and Kierzkowskis model introduced a
The ef‌fects of
trade
liberalization
75

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT