The effects of ethical pressure and power distance orientation on unethical pro‐organizational behavior: the case of earnings management

AuthorDane K. Peterson,Qing Tian
Published date01 April 2016
Date01 April 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12109
The effects of ethical pressure
and power distance orientation
on unethical pro-organizational
behavior: the case of earnings
management
Qing Tian
1
and Dane K. Peterson
2
1. School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, China
2. Department of Marketing, Missouri State University,Springfield, Missouri, USA
A multiphase study tested a proposed mediated moderation model for the joint effects of ethical pressure and
power distance orientation on accountants’ ethical judgments of earnings management. Results based on a
sample of 354 accountants from China indicated that the relationship between ethical pressure and ethical
judgments of earnings management is contingent on the accountants’ power distance orientation. That is, the
relationship between ethical pressure and ethical judgments of earnings management was stronger for
accountants with a high power distance orientation. The results also demonstrated that ethical beliefs in
support of the company serve as a mediator for the interaction effect of ethical pressure and power distance
orientation on the outcome. These results are discussed in terms of viewing earnings management as a form of
unethical pro-organizational behavior which can be effectively investigated within the framework of the
person-situation interactionist model.
Introduction
Unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB) refers
to socially unacceptable employee behavior moti-
vated by a desire to promote the company’s interest
(Umphress et al. 2010). Frequently cited examples of
UPB include deceiving customers, lying to clients,
putting profits ahead of public safety, and falsifying
financial reports. This study examines the attitudes
of business professionals toward one of the most
widely investigated UPBs within the framework of a
person-situation interactionist model. More specifi-
cally, this study examines the ethical views of
accountants with respect to manipulating reported
earnings so that the financial results will accomplish
a desired goal which is commonly referred to as earn-
ings management (Mulford and Comiskey 2011).
The situational factor included in this study as a
potential contributing factor to UPB is ethical pres-
sure. Based on Leicht & Fennell (1997), Peterson
(2003) defined ethical pressure as a situation in which
the employees feel pressured by their peers, supervi-
sors, and other members of the organization to com-
promise their personal values in order to achieve
organization goals resulting in an ethical conflict for
the employee. The personal factor examined in this
study is individual power distance orientation which
represents the extent to which a person believes it is
inappropriate to challenge or question the decisions
made by leaders (Kirkman et al. 2009).
V
C2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road,
Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main St, Malden, MA 02148, USA
doi: 10.1111/beer.12109
159
Business Ethics: A European Review
Volume 25 Number 2 April 2016

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT