A survey on obstacles and difficulties of practical implementation of horizontal collaboration in logistics

AuthorFranco Basso,Mikael Rönnqvist,Andrés Weintraub,Sophie D'Amours
Published date01 May 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12577
Date01 May 2019
Intl. Trans. in Op. Res. 26 (2019) 775–793
DOI: 10.1111/itor.12577
INTERNATIONAL
TRANSACTIONS
IN OPERATIONAL
RESEARCH
A survey on obstacles and difficulties of practical
implementation of horizontal collaboration in logistics
Franco Bassoa, Sophie D’Amoursb,MikaelR
¨
onnqvistband Andr´
es Weintraubc
aEscuela de Ingenier´
ıa Industrial, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
bD´
epartement de G´
enie M´
ecanique, Universit´
e Laval, Qu´
ebec, Canada
cDepartamento Ingenier´
ıa Industrial, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
E-mail: franco.basso@udp.cl [Basso]; sophie.damours@gmc.ulaval.ca [D’Amours];
mikael.ronnqvist@gmc.ulaval.ca [R¨
onnqvist]; aweintra@dii.uchile.cl [Weintraub]
Received 16 March 2018; receivedin revised form 6 June 2018; accepted 8 July 2018
Abstract
During recent years, horizontal collaboration in logistics has gained attention because of achieved potential
benefits such as cost reduction, an increase in fulfillment rates, and a decrease in CO2emissions owing to
reductions in traveleddistances. Successful real-world cases, however,are rare since horizontal cooperation in
logistics is not usually sustainable. This paper pays attentionto this paradox of the lack of cases and discusses
16 identified practical issues that could explain this phenomenon. We propose a taxonomy composed of
four categories categorizing the practical issues according to a value chain approach: design, planning and
operations,market/business, and behaviors. Furthermore, we proposeand discuss some measures to mitigate
these problems.
Keywords:collaborative logistics; horizontal collaboration; transportation;supply chain
1. Introduction
Horizontal collaboration in logistics has received increasing attention in past years, often driven by
the large potential in cost reduction, reduction of uncertainty, and environmental concerns (Ver-
donck et al., 2013; Du et al., 2016). Many articles deal with new methods in sharing principles and
joint planning in literature, though few articles report on successful implementation in practice. In
this article, we focus on practical issues in horizontal collaboration. We define horizontal collabo-
ration as cooperation between companies at the same level of a supply chain, for example, carrier
companies. Practical issues are meant to describe real-world problems stakeholders face when they
try to implement such collaboration.
The main goal of collaborative logistics is to achieve an improved logistic chain, ensuring that
the total fulfillment costs are smaller than the sum of the companies’ individual costs without
C
2018 The Authors.
International Transactionsin Operational Research C
2018 International Federation ofOperational Research Societies
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main St, Malden, MA02148,
USA.
776 F. Basso et al. / Intl. Trans.in Op. Res. 26 (2019) 775–793
collaboration. Examples of horizontal cooperation in logistics include group purchasing, use of
a common inventory location to share fixed costs, collaborative transportation (Quintero-Araujo
et al., 2017), and production lines sharing. Horizontal collaboration in logistics has been studied
in the maritime shipping (Sheppard and Seidman, 2001), disaster relief (Schulz and Blecken, 2010;
Ergun et al., 2014; Garrido et al., 2015), and airline fields (Oum et al., 2004; Garrette et al., 2009;
Weng and Xu, 2014). However, collaborative ground transportation is quite an unexplored area.
In theory, many benefits can be achieved with collaboration, chief among them are cost reduc-
tion and increasing fulfillment rate. On the social side, collaboration usually decreases the traveled
distance by carriers, which implies fewer emissions. In that way, collaboration encourages green
logistics and reduces negative environmental impacts. These benefits have been shown in method-
ological and case study scientific papers, but few applications have been reported and captured
expected benefits. For instance, in Audy et al. (2011), a collaborative transportation agreement is
studied for the furniture industry. Even though theoretically important savings could be perceived
by collaboration, the negotiation to establish how benefits were shared was impossible to carry
out. One of the most important challenges in horizontal collaboration has been to agree on the
sharing principles. Recently, Guajardo and R¨
onnqvist (2016) published an extensive survey in cost
allocation methods in transportation collaboration. In Frisk et al. (2010), eight companies analyzed
the potential to collaborate with Swedish forest transportation authorities to obtain an expected
saving up to 14%. Nowadays, this agreement is no longer in operation. Suzuki and Lu (2017) state
that “two real-world cases in which collaborations were attempted based on the idea similar to that
of our concept, their results may not be used to assess the cost-saving potential of the concept,
because in neither of these two cases, the idea was fully implemented.”
This raises a need for a better understanding of the underlying reasons for this phenomenon.
We would like to better comprehend why collaboration has so many advantages in theory, but is
rarely successful in practice. We have conducted an extensive literature review enhanced with expert
knowledge. We have identified what we have called practical issues in logistics collaboration. To
the best of our knowledge, no papers deal specifically with practical issues in horizontal logistics
collaboration.
The literature is rich in vertical cooperation (Huang et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2018), butthe environ-
ment is quite different. A recurrent example of vertical collaboration is found in the Collaborative
Planning Forecasting and Replenishment (CPFR), where manufacturers and retailers share infor-
mation and make common forecasting to improve demand visibility, thereby improving supply
chain efficiency. We can anticipate that some practical issues in vertical collaboration apply also
to horizontal collaboration. For a complete review of supply chain collaboration, including some
practical issues, we refer the reader to Kanda and Deshmukh (2008).
Following a supply chain perspective, we propose a taxonomy for the practical issues with cat-
egories: design, planning and operations, business/market, and behaviors. Design practical issues
are described as challenges of building efficient, stable, sustainable, and fair collaborations. The
planning and operational practical issues are related to the difficulties arising from the implementa-
tion of such collaboration. The business/market practical issues comprise the collaborative impact
on the firms’ strategical level and explain how agreements impact the whole market. Finally, we
understand the behavioral practical issues as the human relationships challenges.
This classification is organized from a macro- to microperspective with a supply chain point of
view. We first focused on practical issues coming from the design process, that is, issues caused
C
2018 The Authors.
International Transactionsin Operational Research C
2018 International Federation ofOperational Research Societies

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT