Subjective Probability Density Functions from FX Option Prices: Predictive Power and Performance on a Carry Trade Strategy

Date01 June 2018
Published date01 June 2018
AuthorTiago Neves,André Santos,João Guerra
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12146
Subjective Probability Density
Functions from FX Option Prices:
Predictive Power and Performance
on a Carry Trade Strategy*
ANDRÉ SANTOS
,JOÃO GUERRA
AND TIAGO NEVES
§
Quantitative Advisory, EY, Lisbon, Portugal,
Departamento de Matemática and CEMAPRE, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon,
Portugal and
§
Enterprise Risk Services, EY, London, UK
ABSTRACT
In this article, we extracted the risk-neutral densities (RNDs) and subjective
probability density functions of the US Dollar/Brazilian Real (USD/BRL) ex-
change rate and evaluated its performance in predicting the future realizations
of the USD/BRL exchange rate. The RNDs were estimated using two structural
models and three nonstructural models. In the rst category, we included the
Variance Gamma-OU model and the CGMY Gamma-OU model. In the second
category, we included the density functional based on conuent
hypergeometric function model, the mixture of lognormal distributions
model, and the smoothed implied volatility smile. The density functional
based on conuent hypergeometric function and the CGMY Gamma-OU pro-
duced 1-month term densities (RND and subjective probability density func-
tion) with the highest forecasting power of the 1-month USD/BRL exchange
rate. Finally, we applied the CGMY Gamma-OU model to extract a sample of
subjective cumulative probabilities of 1-month USD/BRL movements, and
used them as explanatory variables in predictive time series models, whose de-
pendent variable was the 1-month carry trade return. Its predictive power was
then tested and conrmed in three trading strategies that over performed the
standard carry trade strategy in terms of annualized cumulative returns.
JEL Codes: G13; C13; C15; F31
Accepted: 22 June 2017
An option is a contingent claim whose payoff depends on the future state of the
underlying asset, and as result, option prices are inuenced by the expectations
about the future underlying asset prices. For a particular asset and maturity, the
* We would like to thank the editor and an anonymous referee for valuable comments that improved
the paper. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and are not necessarily en-
dorsed by the authorsemployers. João Guerra was partially supported by the Project CEMAPRE
UID/MULTI/00491/2013 nanced by FCT/MCTES through national funds.
© 2017 International Review of Finance Ltd. 2017 1
International Review of Finance, 2017
DOI: 10.1111/ir.12146
International Review of Finance, 18:2, 2018: pp. 253–286
DOI:10.1111/irfi .12146
© 2017 International Review of Finance Ltd. 2017
availability of option prices for various exercise prices allows the estimation of
risk-neutral densities (RNDs).
In nancial markets, there is only a range of discrete option prices; there-
fore, it is necessary to estimate the RNDs through a smoothing function. The
RND will vary depending on the model applied on its estimation, and so, the
choice of a reliable model is very important. The use of a standard option
pricing model such as Black and Scholes is not recommended because of
its limitations. Black and Scholes assumes that the asset price is modeled
by a geometric Brownian motion with a constant expected return and vola-
tility. The constant volatility assumption contradicts the empirical evidence
where asset prices exhibit different implied volatilities across maturities and
strikes; therefore, a realistic model shall assume stochastic volatility through
time.
For the period between June 2006 and September 2013, we estimated RNDs
using option prices with the US Dollar/Brazilian Real (USD/BRL) exchange rate
as underlying asset. The RNDs were generated using two categories of models:
structural and nonstructural. Structural models assume specic dynamics for
the price or volatility process. Nonstructural models allow the estimation of an
RND without describing any stochastic process for the price or volatility of the
underlying asset.
In the latter, we used two parametric models, the density functional based on
conuent hypergeometric function (DFCH) and the mixture of lognormal distri-
butions (MLN), and one nonparametric model, the smoothed implied volatility
smile (SML). In the former, we applied models based on Lévy processes: the
Variance Gamma-OU (VG Gamma-OU) and the CGMY Gamma-OU. The Lévy
models chosen are rich and sophisticated stochastic volatility models that gener-
ate jumps for asset returns and volatility. Consequently, they are able to generate
RNDs with statistical properties similar to the ones observed empirically, that is,
with leptokurtic distributions and fat tails.
The option prices incorporate investorsrisk preferences; hence, the RND
is not a direct measure of the subjective probabilities that investors attribute
to future underlying asset prices. The subjective probability density function
(SPDF) can be extracted from the RND as long as we know investorsrisk
preferences, and based on that, Bliss and Panigirtzoglou (2004) suggested
the estimation of the risk aversion assuming that if investors are rational,
their SPDF is equal to the distribution of observed realizations, called objec-
tive distribution.
Consequently, we expect that the SPDF provides accurate forecasts, with the
difference between RND and objective distribution arising from the rational
investor risk aversion. Various authors estimated the SPDF assuming stationary
over long periods (Ait-Sahalia and Lo 2000; Jackwerth 2000). We believe that
Bliss and Panigirtzoglou (2004) approach is more suitable to extract the SPDF,
because it estimates probabilities that are more reactive to market changes;
therefore, we decided to use Bliss and Panigirtzoglou method to convert RNDs
into SPDFs.
International Review of Finance
© 2017 International Review of Finance Ltd. 20172
International Review of Finance
254 © 2017 International Review of Finance Ltd. 2017
After testing the predictive power of the 1-month SPDFs, we had the ambition
to understand the practical utility of it. With the goal of predicting the direction
of the 1-month carry trade return on the USD/BRL exchange rate, we extracted
sample points of the SPDFs (subjective cumulative probabilities of certain move-
ments of the exchange rate USD/BRL) and use them as explanatory variables in
time series models. Based on the predictions of the carry trade return, we simu-
lated a few trading strategies using futures on the BRL/USD (the inverse of the
pair USD/BRL means price of Brazilian Real in terms of dollars hereafter called
BRL) and compared its protability against a benchmark carry trade strategy
where we were always long on a BRL future. All trading strategies based on the
SPDFs exhibited much higher annualized and cumulative returns than the stan-
dard carry trade strategy, hence showing the good predictive power of SPDFs.
Our work goes beyond previous studies as it includes not only the analysis of
the market sentiment but also the forecasting power of the RNDs and SPDFs.
Moreover, it shows how to use the information embedded in the SPDFs to enter
in protable trading strategies.
This paper is divided into six sections. Section i describes the nonstructural
and structural models used to estimate the RNDs, and Section ii denes the meth-
odology used to transform the RNDs into SPDFs. The data used in this work are
presented in Section iii. In Section iv, we assess the predictive power of the
RND and SPDF through the comparison between the estimated densities and
the realized outcomes of the USD/BRL exchange rate. The protability of trading
strategies based on these densities is analyzed in Section v, and nally, the con-
clusions are presented in Section vi.
To help the readers understand the economic environment between June
2006 and September 2013, in Appendix A, we analyzed the probabilities pro-
vided by the RNDs and SPDFs and described the main market and political events
that occurred in that time.
I. RISK-NEUTRAL DENSITY ESTIMATION
A. Option prices and the risk-neutral density
The call option value is given by the discounted value of its expected payoff at
the expiration date T.
CX;TðÞ¼erT
XfS
TXðÞdS T(1)
where Xis the exercise price, S
T
is the price of the underlying asset at T, and ris the
risk-free interest rate. The expectation is taken under the risk-neutral measure.
Breeden and Litzenberger (1978) deduced the relationship between the option
prices and the RND by taking the second derivative of equation (1) with respect
to X, that is,
d2CX;TðÞ
dX 2¼erTfS
T
ðÞ:(2)
Predictive Power of FX Option Prices
© 2017 International Review of Finance Ltd. 2017 3
Predictive Power of FX Option Prices
© 2017 International Review of Finance Ltd. 2017 255

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT