Service modularity in managing healthcare logistics

Date11 February 2019
Pages174-194
Published date11 February 2019
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-12-2017-0338
AuthorTimo Pohjosenperä,Päivi Kekkonen,Saara Pekkarinen,Jari Juga
Subject MatterManagement science & operations,Logistics
Service modularity in managing
healthcare logistics
Timo Pohjosenperä
Department of Marketing, Management and International Business,
Oulu Business School, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Päivi Kekkonen
Industrial Engineering and Management,
University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, and
Saara Pekkarinen and Jari Juga
Department of Marketing, Management and International Business,
Oulu Business School, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine how modularity is used for enabling value creation in
managing healthcare logistics services.
Design/methodology/approach Material logistics of four different kinds of hospitals is examined
through a qualitative case study. The theoretical framework builds on the literature on healthcare logistics,
service modularity and value creation.
Findings The case hospitals have developed their material logistics independently from others when
looking at the modularity of offerings, processes and organisations. Services, such as assortment
management, shelving and developing an information platform, have been performed in-house partly by the
care personnel, but steps towards modularised and standardised solutions are now being taken in the case
hospitals, including ideas about outsourcing some of the services.
Research limitations/implications This paper proposes seven modularity components for healthcare
logistics management: segmentation, categorisation and unitisation of offerings, differentiation and
decoupling of processes, and centralisation and specialisation of organisations. Thus, this study clarifies the
three-dimensional concept of modularity as a cognitive frame for managing logistics services with
heterogeneous customer needs in a rapidly changing healthcare environment.
Practical implications Modularity offers a tool for developing logistics services inside the hospital and
increases possibilities to consider also external logistics service providers.
Social implications Managing healthcare logistics services through modularity has potential social
implications in developing healthcare processes and changing the usage of health services. On a wider scale,
modularity is helping healthcare systems reaching their goals in terms of service quality and cost.
Originality/value This paper shows the context-specific antecedents of service modularity and the usage
of modular thinking in managing healthcare logistics.
Keywords Europe, Case study, Logistics services, Outsourcinginsourcing, Healthcare logistics
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
The importance of material flows as part of health services is recognised nowadays both
in the management of healthcare organisations and in academic research (e.g. Beier, 1995;
Jarrett, 1998; Landry and Philippe, 2004; Kumar et al., 2008). This awareness originates
from the global dilemma of healthcare organisations aiming to gain more value and
reduce costs (see e.g. Kaplan and Porter, 2011). New models have been sought from
industry for increasing healthcare logistics efficiency and effectiveness while still
keeping in mind the unique features of healthcare that constrain the applicability of
knowledge from the industrial and retail sectors (de Vries and Huijsman, 2011;
Abdulsalam et al., 2015). Thus, healthcare logistics has become a constantly growing
field of research and an important development area for healthcare organisations
(Volland et al., 2017).
The International Journal of
Logistics Management
Vol. 30 No. 1, 2019
pp. 174-194
© Emerald PublishingLimited
0957-4093
DOI 10.1108/IJLM-12-2017-0338
Received 15 December 2017
Revised 5 June 2018
15 September 2018
31 October 2018
Accepted 4 November 2018
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/0957-4093.htm
174
IJLM
30,1
One of the concepts developed in the manufacturing industry is modularity, which is
used as an enabler for postponement (e.g. Gualandris and Kalchschmidt, 2013) and
mass-customisation (e.g. Feitzinger and Lee, 1997; Salvador et al., 2004) strategies. However,
other disciplines have also adopted and modified the modularity concept (see e.g.
Campagnolo and Camuffo, 2010). The expanding research stream of service modularity
(Frandsen, 2017) has brought up new aspects from various empirical contexts (Brax et al.,
2017), including logistics (Pekkarinen and Ulkuniemi, 2008; Bask et al., 2010) and recently
also healthcare services (Vähätalo and Kallio, 2015; Silander et al., 2017). Overall, modularity
can be seen as a useful cognitive frame for categorisation and interpretation of diverse
economic phenomena (MacDuffie, 2013; Gärtner and Schön, 2015).
The aim of this study is to describe how modularity is used for enabling value creation in
healthcare logistics services. We approach the question by first itemising the antecedents of
modularity and then analysing the central components of modularity in healthcare logistics.
Healthcare organisations, such as hospital units, wards and municipal health centres, have
diverse needs for logistics services. As the needs are heterogeneous, modular services may
offer a way to achieve the desired outcomes. In this examination, the outcomes of
modularisation are reflected in the value creation literature, where the mechanisms, actors
and their roles in value creation processes are under discussion. According to Grönroos
and Voima (2013), the customer and service provider are in changing roles of both
facilitating and creating value.
The empirical research is based on an interdisciplinary study carried out in four case
hospitals in Finland. Two hospitals in northern Finland, a university hospital and a regional
hospital, have their own in-house logistics service departments that take care of purchasing,
deliveries, warehousing and service development activities. However, both hospitals are also
considering opportunities for using external logistics service providers (LSPs) for some of
their logistics operations. A regional hospital in southwestern Finland has adopted
a centralised model to also offer logistics services to municipal health centres in its region.
Finally, a newly established private hospital in southern Finland has developed a modern,
lean approach to material logistics and support services, including the systematic use of
outsourced services from external providers.
This paper is organised as follows. Section 2 gives an overview of the concepts of
modularity and value creation, especially in the context of healthcare material logistics.
Section 3 introduces the case hospitals. Section 4 defines the qualitative methods and data
collection of this research. The results and analysis in Sections 5 and 6 are organised in
accordance with the supply chain partnering model by Lambert et al. (1996), describing the
drivers, facilitators, components and outcomes of value creation through modularity.
The results are discussed in Section 7, and the conclusions are presented in Section 8.
2. Modularity and value creation in healthcare logistics services
2.1 Modularity definitions
The history of modularity can be traced back to the standardisation efforts of the industrial
era, for instance in operations management. Rutenberg (1971) addressed the need for
commonality across product variants. Fundamental to modular designs are the modules
that have a specific function; they should be relatively independent and have standardised
interfaces to enable integration (Baldwin and Clark, 2000). Later, the concept of modularity
has also been adopted in many other disciplines, including logistics services (e.g. Bask et al.,
2010; Pekkarinen and Ulkuniemi, 2008) and healthcare (Vähätalo and Kallio, 2015;
Broekhuis et al., 2017; Silander et al., 2017). In the service domain, modularity is defined as
being formed of one or many bundles of tasks highly interdependent of each other but
loosely dependent on other modules creating value for the customer through efficiency and
customisation (see Kriegel et al., 2013; Ulkuniemi and Pekkarinen, 2011).
175
Modularity in
healthcare
logistics

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT