Risk‐Coping Measures against Health Shocks during the Process of Penetration of Health Insurance in Vietnam

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12118
Date01 June 2017
Published date01 June 2017
AuthorMasako Hasegawa
Risk-Coping Measures against Health Shocks
during the Process of Penetration of Health
Insurance in Vietnam*
Masako Hasegawa
Received 20 October 2014; accepted 16 March 2017
Does the recent introduction of public health insurance inuence householdsrisk-
coping measures in developing countries? This study investigates risk-coping
measures for health shocks using a Living Standard Measurement Survey in
Vietnam where universal health coverage is aimed to be achieved. The estimated
results suggest that precautionary savings are the main form of assets in poor
households. Health insurance seems to be used by people in poor health, which
indicates that the problem of adverse selection exits. Importantly, get well gifts in
the form of money play a signicant role in helping households cope with health
shocks. A traditional informal insurance system still exists in close Vietnamese
communities.
Keywords: health shock, risk-coping measures, health insurance, get well gifts.
JEL classication codes: D14, I13, Z13.
doi: 10.1111/asej.12118
I. Introduction
Health shocks are one of the most serious risks for households in developing
countries, where public safety nets and private insurance schemes are usually
not fully developed. To cope with health shocks, households take several risk-
coping measures distinctive of developing countries. A large number of studies
have been conducted on risk-coping measures because they can reveal the
socioeconomic features of risk-coping measures, which are determined by market
imperfections (Fafchamps and Lund; 2003, Okamoto, 2011).
To date, householdsrisk-coping measures in developing countries havemostly
been discussed from the viewpoint of consumption smoothing in the permanent-
income hypothesis. In the hypothesis, households attempt to build up
precautionary savings and have loans with and without interest to smooth their
consumption. The precautionary savings widely held in developing countries in
*Hasegawa (corresponding author): Japan Institute for Public Policy Studies and Osaka School of
International Public Policy, Osaka University, Ogikubo 3-12-5-102, Suginami, Tokyo, Japan, 167-
0052. Email: hasemako@jcom.zaq.ne.jp. I am grateful for the insightful comments and suggestions
of two anonymous referees, the Editor of this journal, Professor Naoto Yamauchi, Professor Tsunehiro
Otsuki and Professor Hiroyuki Yamada.
© 2017 East Asian Economic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
Asian Economic Journal 2017, Vol.31 No. 2, 139164 139
bs_bs_banner
the form of productive assets, such as land and livestock, and unproductive assets,
such as cash and grains (Lim and Townsend, 1994; Udry, 1994; Udry, 1995;
Tibaijuka, 1997; Jalan and Ravallion, 2001; Fafchamps and Lund, 2003; Takasaki
et al., 2004; Yagura, 2006). Among these options, the saving of productive assets
has the most dominant role in coping with health shocks, because medical
treatment often requires a lump-sum payment (Takasaki et al., 2004; Yagura,
2006). The sale of productive assets, however, necessarily reduces households
means of production and affects their long-term income, which often leads them
into poverty in the end. In other words, households suffering from health shocks
can be caught in the medical poverty trap by selling their productive assets, which
may affect their permanent income. Thus, householdsrisk-coping measures can
show how serious health shocks are in the society where they have no other
choice. It should also be added that there is sometimes an informal safety net
functioning in the community.
To mitigate health shocks, several countries are attempting to introduce
universal health insurance schemes.
1
Moreover, there are some community-based
and area-based health insurance programs that local public agencies and civil
society organizations operate in developing countries (Ginneken, 2003; Morduch,
2006).
2
Given these circumstances, in the present paper we seek to identify how
public health insurance inuences householdsrisk-coping measures. We
investigate the case of Vietnam, where universal health insurance coverage is
aimed to be achieved in the near future.
3
We wish to demonstrate the following three points in this paper. First, we
examine how often certain forms of precautionary savings are used as risk-
coping measures. According to the Vietnam Access to Resources Household
Survey 2006, more than 80 percent of householdssavings for possible medical
expenses are in the form of cattle, land and jewelry, especially in rural areas due
to restricted access to nancial institutions. Newman et al. (2008) report that
three-quarters of all nancial savings are hoarded inside the household in the
form of jewelry, cash and gold. Thus, precautionary savings in Vietnam may
be held in the form of productive assets, precious metals and cash hoarded in
households.
In general, household savings should be released and invested in markets
through nancial institutions to generate economic growth. Since the mid-
1990s, Vietnam has increased its saving mobilization, with a current saving rate
of approximately 30 percent (World Bank, World Development Indicators). Given
1 Columbia, Mexico, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam,Iran and Tunisia have tried to promote health
insurance schemes.
2 Self-Employed Womens Association (SEWA) of India and FINCA of Uganda have begun to
operate community-based and area-based health insurance programs.
3 The Government of Vietnam enacted the Law on Health Insurance in 2008, aiming to achieve
universal health coverage by 2014. However, the target year is said to be postponed as of 2014.
ASIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL 140
© 2017 East Asian Economic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT