Real Reform at the UNITED NATIONS.

The United States presidency of the Security Council in January 2000 was a good indication of what could be, with strong and consistent leadership from the world's remaining superpower. The Permanent Representative of the United States to the United Nations, Richard Holbrooke, deserves great credit for this demonstration of leadership. Still, one is left with the image of a Clinton Administration anxious to do what is expected, yet held back by legislative restrictions and a lack of resources, writes J. Brian Atwood, Executive Vice-President, Citizens Energy Corporation (United States).

The United States can no longer claim, as it could during its decade-long experience with huge fiscal deficits, that its economy is undergoing "structural adjustment". Today, with the domestic debate focussing on how to spend a huge surplus, the issue is whether and how the country will engage creatively with the international community to preserve its interests and promote peace, prosperity and democracy. The United States' role at the United Nations should move to the centre of this debate.

The view expressed by Senator Jesse Helms before the Council in January is shared by a portion of the American electorate. However, polls show that the vast majority support international cooperation, engagement and the United Nations. This majority is not preoccupied with the loss of sovereign prerogative. The good news is that both presidential candidates share the majority view. They may have different approaches to foreign policy, but none would reject the United Nations as a vital vehicle for dispute resolution, dialogue and development.

The crucial issue is reform. On this, there is little consensus and no stomach for debating the merits in such a way as to forge a common policy, at least not during a political campaign. All organizations must change to remain relevant and effective in this era of globalization, and the UN is no exception.

The Secretary-General has recognized the need to adapt. Impressive steps have been taken to reduce waste and improve accountability, coordination and the effective delivery of services. Public/private partnerships have been pursued, and efforts are under way to use information technology creatively in the developing world. Yet, problems continue and the reform challenge remains.

I have some experience in attempting to reform a large institution. The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) was by no means as...