Racial Undertones on Violence and Human Bodies: White Migrants' Online Epistemologies of Insecurity and Discomfort in Post-Apartheid South Africa

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.13169/intecritdivestud.2.2.0006
Pages6-21
Published date01 December 2019
Date01 December 2019
AuthorPrimus Tazanu
Subject Matterracism online,violence and insecurity,post-apartheid South Africa,whiteness,white South African migrants
International Journal of CRITICAL DIVERSITY STUDIES 2.2 December 2019
Racial Undertones on Violence and
Human Bodies
White Migrants’ Online Epistemologies of Insecurity
and Discomfort in Post-Apartheid South Africa
Primus Tazanu
Centre of African Studies, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
Primus M. Tazanu holds a Ph.D. in social anthropology from the University of Freiburg,
Germany. He teaches at the Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University
of Buea, Cameroon. He is also a guest researcher at the Centre of African Studies,
University of Copenhagen, Denmark. His research focuses on social practices and the
production of meanings through media technologies: new/social media and social
relationships, implications of social media/smartphones on socioeconomic and politi-
cal life, media/social media and Pentecostalism as well as media and racism. Dr Tazanu
has been a postdoctoral fellow at the Wits Centre for Diversity Studies, University of
the Witwatersrand in South Africa as well as a guest lecturer at the universities of
Basel and Freiburg. He is a member of the editorial board of Spears Books.
ABSTRACT
Violence and insecurity in post-apartheid South Africa are recurrent themes in online
messages by white South Africans who have either migrated or wish to leave the
country. These online authors position white people as victims or potential victims
of crime committed by black people. It is a narrative which references apartheid as
a period of safety and security, presupposing life is no longer what it used to be for
white people. Through comparing the pre-1994 with the post-apartheid period and
particularly emphasising that the black leadership is failing the country, the white
migrants construct an epistemology – with racist undertones – of an unliveable South
Africa. Narratives of black violence enacted upon white people, as well as white inno-
cence and benevolence, are central features of the migrants’ online complaints of an
unliveable South Africa which I take up as a point of focus in this article.
KEYWORDS
racism online, violence and insecurity, post-apartheid South Africa, whiteness,
white South African migrants
Racial UndeRtones on Violence and HUman Bodies 7
International Journal of CRITICAL DIVERSITY STUDIES 2.2 December 2019
Introduction
More than 25 years following the end of apartheid in South Africa, intense debates about
identity and belonging continue to dominate public conversations in the country. Underlying
the question of belonging is the extent to which people feel at home in South Africa. Writing
about the challenges white South Africans face in adjusting in the post-apartheid period,
Griffiths and Prozesky (2010) observe that white people leaving the country do so under the
pretext of violence, insecurity and affirmative action. Violence and insecurity resonate in
the online posts and comments by white South Africans who have migrated to New Zealand,
Australia and USA. They frame their relocation to these white-majority countries as induced
by a post-apartheid South Africa that is hostile to its white citizens. The racial undertones
underlying these epistemologies position white bodies as exceptional and requiring special
attention, thus the necessity to flee violence.
To suggest that the white body is exceptional draws from the construction of race, a
belief in classifying human beings according to “biologically discrete and exclusive groups
based on physical and cultural traits” (Golash-Boza, 2016, p. 130). Racism is a complex
system of socioeconomic and political expressions that places some human groups at a dis-
advantage primarily because of their physical appearance. The idea of race developed with
European conquest of the Americas (and other parts of the world) and the subsequent
enslavement of Africans in a period which saw European identity shift from Christians to
whites (Mignolo, 2000; Golash-Boza 2016). These historical constructions are undergirded
by the “economic and political advantage” gained by people of European descent “during
and subsequent to European colonial expansion” (Steyn, 2005, p. 121; Grosfoguel, Oso &
Christou, 2015). Skin colour is an important ingredient in racial construction and Europeans
have historically used Africans as the “main foil against which they [Europeans] defined
themselves” (Steyn, 2001, p. 5). Consequently, when classifying humans, white people posi-
tioned themselves at the top, and suggested they were more human than people of colour
which means attributing greater humanity to people with lighter skin (Maldonado-Torres,
2007; Fanon, 1967; Gordon, 1995).
We thus understand racist expressions as encompassing beliefs and practices that sug-
gest or imply the superiority of whites or inferiority of people of colour in South Africa.
The internet is a fertile space for reproducing these racist ideas. Research on online racism
is abundant and many trajectories are in line with this article. There have been studies on
sublimated racism on websites that use liberal language to mimic inclusiveness and toler-
ance (Daniels, 2009a/b, 2012). There is also research focusing on overt online racism,
including people using internet fora to foster the idea of white supremacy (Back, 2002;
Atton, 2006). In one way or the other, these studies reveal how racism circulates online
unregulated. Other works on online racism use discursive psychology to look at how peo-
ple use “rhetorical work to avoid being labelled as being prejudicial” (Goodman and Rowe,
2014, p. 33). Goodman and Rowe (2014) write about strategies used by online participants
to deny racism in the United Kingdom; they reject accusations of racism against Roma
people even as their remarks are apparently racist. Denying racism is a prudent strategy for
those who fear being labelled biased or irrational (Durrheim, Greener & Whitehead, 2015;
Van Dijk, 1992). Similarly, Cresswell, Whitehead and Durrheim (2014, p. 2513) have

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT