The penal protection posibility of the EU's financial interests by means of criminal law

AuthorAlexandru Boroi
PositionAlexandru Ioan Cuza Police Academy
Pages27-38
27
THE PENAL PROTECTION POSIBILITY OF THE EU’S
FINANCIAL INTERESTS
BY MEANS OF CRIMINAL LAW
Ph. D professor Alexandru Boroi
„Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Police Academy
Abstract:
The European institutions competence of imposing regulations in the field of
criminal law represented a serious problem through time.
The positive effect that community right has over criminal law is represented
by the obligation of the member states to apply in practice the harmonization
directives which come to complete the common market and the implementation of
common policies like agriculture policy. The positive effect is manifesting under
the form of measures taken in the area of criminal law by the member states in
fulfilling the obligations that drift from community law.
A recent decision of EU Court of Justice comes to clarify the distribution of
competence between the first and the third pillar regarding criminal law area.
Regarding the guarantees offered by the community institutions, the actual
situation is of a nature to cause concern. The fundament that legitimizes the
adoption of criminal law measures on the level of the Member States is given by the
national Constitution which stipulates the rights and fundamental liberties and
democratic principles for the protection of these.
Key words: penal protection, financial interests, criminal law.
The European institutions competence of imposing regulations in the field of
criminal law represented a serious problem through time.
Since the Rome Treaty to the beginning of the 70’s, the EU didn’t have
competence regarding criminal law. The only exceptions were false statement and
protecting the nuclear secret35. The Schengen Agreements permitted for the first
time approaching this topic, but only to forbid the direct intervention of the
Communities in this matter36. Criminal law is part of the EU competence once the
EU treaty appeared and laid down “criminal cooperation” as a common interest
issue (art 29 of Amsterdam Treaty”)37. A criminal penalty is also set forth in the
35 Art. 194, Euratom Treaty.
36 H. Habayle, L’application du Traite sur L’Union Europeenne, RSC, January-March 1995, p. 34
and the following.
37 This article stipulates that in order to accomplish the Union’ objectives, especially free movement
of persons, and without prejudicing the communities’ competencies, the member states consider the
following fields as common interest matters: fighting against drugs addiction, fighting international

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT