Proposals to Establish a Partnership Bankruptcy Regime in China: With Lessons from the UK and USA

Published date01 June 2014
AuthorWei Chuyi
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1223
Date01 June 2014
Proposals to Establish a Partnership
Bankruptcy Regime in China: With Lessons
from the UK and USA
Wei Chuyi*
School of Law, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
Abstract
Following in the steps of the USA and UK, China introduced partnerships with limited
liability in 2006, the same year that a market-oriented bankruptcy statute was enacted.
Although the bankruptcy statute enshrines basic elements of modern bankruptcy law, it
fails to stipulate specic rules for partnership bankruptcy. As partnership with limited
liability acquires increasing importance, especially limited partnerships as a popular
form of private equity rms, a partnership bankruptcy regime becomes indispensable.
ThisarticleconsiderstheexperienceoftheUKandUSAinordertomakeproposalsto
establish a partnership bankruptcy regime in China. Although partnership bankruptcy
law can be formulated by analogy to corporate bankruptcy law, special considerations
must be given to the characteristics of partnership such as unlimited liability and lack of
separation of management from ownership. Further, as partnership bankruptcy may
lead to partner bankruptcy and vice versa, conicts between partnership creditors
and partnerspersonal creditors must also be considered. Copyright © 2014 INSOL
International and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
I. Introduction
Under the EnterpriseBankruptcy Law (EBL) promulgatedin 2006, Chinese partner-
ships are permitted to use the bankruptcy liquidation procedure. However, current
rules regarding partnership bankruptcy are largely vague, and detailed rules of
applying bankruptcy law to partnerships have not beenformulated. Besides the bank-
ruptcy statue,another signicant change in the Chinese legallandscape in 2006 is the
introductionof partnerships with limited liability into the Partnership Enterprise Law
(PEL),
1
particularly limited partnership, which now have become the main form of
*E-mail: weichuyi@gmail.com
1. The English translation of the EBL, PEL and other
Chinese statutes discussed in this article is taken from
the website of the National Peoples Congress with
some alterations made by the author: http://www.
npc.gov.cn/englishnpc/Law/Frameset-page2.html.
Copyright © 2014 INSOL International and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Int. Insolv. Rev., Vol. 23: 122143 (2014)
Published online 10 June 2014 in Wiley Online Library
(wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/iir.1223
private equity rms. As private equity rms organised as partnerships are looking at
increasing risk of failure, a sound bankruptcy regime for partnerships becomes more
important than ever. The purpose of this article is to propose to establish a partner-
ship bankruptcy regime in China within the current framework of bankruptcy law,
on the basis of the experienceof the UK and USA. In Section II, expansion of limited
liability into partnerships from the USA and UK to China will be accounted,and the
need for a partnership bankruptcy regime will be demonstrated. Section III will rst
briey introduce the current bankruptcy regime in China both in terms of its basic
structures and operation in reality. As Chinese bankruptcy law is similar to the UK
and US bankruptcy law in principle, it is possible to establish a partnership bank-
ruptcy regime on the basis of the experience of the UK and USA, and this will be
the focus of Section III. Section IV will look at the conicts between partnership
creditors and personal creditors of the partnership both when a partnership and its
partners go bankrupt simultaneously and when only partners are insolvent and the
partnership is economically viable. Rules on these issues in China are vague and
awed; therefore,the experience of the UK and USA will again be a source of inspi-
ration for future reform.The nal part, Section V, is a conclusion of the whole thesis.
Before any discussion on bankruptcy starts, a clarication of the meaning of insol-
vencyand bankruptcyneeds to be made. When insolvency refers to a nancial state,
it usually has two connotations. First, it refers to the inability to pay debts as they fall
due (equity or cash ow insolvency). Second, it refers to the situation where a debtors
liabilities exceed its assets (balance sheet insolvency).
2
In the UK, the formal procedure
of being declared insolvent is also referred to as insolvency for ent erprises, whereas such
procedure is dened as bankruptcy for individuals. It is worth noticing that in Scotland,
the insolvency procedure is referred to as sequestration. As the UK bankrup tcy regime
discussed here mostly refers to the English bankruptcy regime and Scots law will only
be tangentially considered, no further discussion will be made on sequestration, which
in most part resembles the English insolvency. In the US context, insolvencyis usually
only used to describe a nancial state, whereas bankruptcyis a generic term for the
legal procedure of being declared insolvent for both enterprises and individuals.
3
China has followed the USA in using bankruptcy ( pochan)asthegenericterm
for the legal procedure to declare insolvency. However, as currently the application
of Chinese bankruptcy law is conned to enterprises, bankruptcyper se in fact only
refers to enterprise bankruptcy.
II. Expansion of Limited Liability into Partnerships and the Need for a
Partnership Bankruptcy Regime in China
Limited liability has usually been regarded as an essential feature of corporation.
4
With limited liability, shareholders and directors are shielded from debts of the
2. Bryan A Garner (ed), Blacks Law Dictionary (8 edn,
Thomson West 2004), 2331.
3. Roy M. Goode, Principles of Corporate Insolvency Law
(4 edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2011), 1.
4. John Armour and others, The Essential Elements
on Corporate Law: What is Corporate Law?(2009)
(law.harvard.edu, 2009)<http://www.law.harvard.edu/
programs/olin_center/papers/pdf/Kraakman_643.
pdf>accessed 10 January 2014.
Partnership Bankruptcy Regime in China 123
Copyright © 2014 INSOL International and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Int. Insolv. Rev., Vol. 23: 122143 (2014)
DOI: 10.1002/iir

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT