Performance assessment and definition of improvement paths for microfinance institutions: an application to a network of village banks in Cameroon

AuthorJoseph Nzongang,Isabelle Piot‐Lepetit
Date01 July 2019
Published date01 July 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12572
Intl. Trans. in Op. Res. 26 (2019) 1188–1210
DOI: 10.1111/itor.12572
INTERNATIONAL
TRANSACTIONS
IN OPERATIONAL
RESEARCH
Performance assessment and definition of improvement paths
for microfinance institutions: an application to a network of
village banks in Cameroon
Isabelle Piot-Lepetitaand Joseph Nzongangb
aMOISA, INRA, Economics and Management Division, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
bFaculty of Economics and Management, University of Dschang,Dschang, Cameroon
E-mail: isabelle.piot-lepetit@inra.fr [Piot-Lepetit]; jonzongang@gmail.com[Nzongang]
Received 30 November2016; received in revised form 28 September 2017; accepted 8 June 2018
Abstract
The objective of this paper is an assessment of the financial and social performance of a network of village
banks in Cameroon and the provision of data-driven guidance to managers helping them in their decision-
making process. An analysis framework in three stages is developed. First, a data envelopment analysis
(DEA) is implemented for measuring efficiency, identifying best practices, and setting goals to less efficient
microfinance institutions. Then, a DEA operating frontiers (DEA-OF) model is designed to identify im-
provement paths setting short-term goals toward their long-term DEA objective and providing effective and
time-dependent guidance to managers in their efficiency improvement process. Finally, DEA and DEA-OF
results are translated into financial andnonfinancial indicators daily used by managers through three different
and interrelated scorecards. Results of this third stage areused for identifying village banks ready for the new
phase of development of the network aiming to fund community projects.
Keywords: microfinance; data envelopment analysis; DEA operating frontiers; financial and social efficiency; OR for
development
1. Introduction
Cameroon is a country with vast natural resources and a population of 23 million people. It is also
culturally and geographically very diverse, with nearly 250 different linguistic groups, two official
languages (English and French),and all major climates and vegetation of the African continent on its
territory. This country is currently considered as a lower middle-income country bythe World Bank
(2016) with social indicators and levels of poverty that are below those for comparator countries.
However, the government of Cameroon aims to achieve the state of higher middle-income country
by 2035. The World Bank considers that there exists a huge potential for economic growth and
C
2018 The Authors.
International Transactionsin Operational Research C
2018 International Federation ofOperational Research Societies
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main St, Malden, MA02148,
USA.
I. Piot-Lepetit and J. Nzongang / Intl. Trans. in Op. Res. 26 (2019) 1188–1210 1189
poverty reduction in Cameroon.Indeed, over the last decade, the country has been characterized by
positive economic growth from 4.6% in 2012 to 5.9% in 2015, spurred by large public investments
in infrastructure. But, to attainthe higher middle-income status by 2035, growth needs to accelerate
further; requiring a substantial increase in the level of investments from 20% to 32% of GDP (World
Bank, 2016). As the public sector alone cannot bring this about, much more private investment is
necessary as well as improvements in the business environment (Piot-Lepetit, 2017).
However, despite economic growth, national poverty has remained almost unchanged. While
Cameroon is urbanizing rapidly, poverty remains a rural phenomenon and is increasingly concen-
trated in Northern Cameroon. In 2014, poverty was at 38% with more than 90% in rural areas and
57% of all poor people located in the north of the country. Indeed, poverty decreased from 40% in
2001 to 38% in 2014, but with a declined in urban areas from 18% in 2001 to 9% in 2014 and an
increase in rural areas from 52% in 2001 to 57% in 2014. Besides, the rapid increase in poverty in
Northern Cameroon occurred beforeBoko Haram activity. But, poverty estimates for the Northern
region should be considered as lower bounds, since the consequence of the increased influence of
refugees, internally displaced persons, and the closure of markets, roads, and frontiers has not been
taken into account by national statistics (World Bank, 2016). Thus, the Millennium Development
Goal of 25% of poverty by 2015 is not achieved (Miamo Wendji, 2017).
Microfinance is an activity that supplies financial services to low-income population, which
normally does not have access to the conventional banking system. Microfinance services mainly
include loans and savings, but some microfinance institutions (MFIs) also provide microinsurance
as well as other financial services such as remittances or mobile telephony, among others. Usu-
ally the poor have no access to loans from the conventional banking system, because they cannot
put up acceptable collateral and/or because costs of screening, monitoring the activities of the
poor, and enforcing their contracts are too high for banks to make lending to this group prof-
itable (Hermes and Lensink, 2007). Lack of access to credit is generally seen as one of the main
reasons why many people in developing countries remain poor. For Professor Yunnus, founder of
the Grameen Bank and the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize, the poor have skills that remain un- or un-
derutilized mainly because existing institutions or policies do not offer them the support they need
(Seelos and Mair, 2005).
In Cameroon, the Mutelles Communautaires de Croissance (or MC²) network is a community-
based development model conceived to fight against poverty by mobilizing savings and resources
within rural communities. Founded in 1992, this network of village banks provides microfinance
services in rural Cameroon with the objective of improving living conditions of targeted populations
and promoting agriculture and rural development. Nowadays, there exist more than 70 microbanks
within this network (Piot-Lepetit and Nzongang, 2014). Each entity providesstructures that people
trust and help them escape the poverty trap and gain control over their lives. Designed on local
needs, these nonprofit social enterprises have a mission of providing financial services that cater
directly to basic human needs remaining unsatisfied by more conventional institutions in both the
economic and social domain (Seelos and Mair, 2005). Thus, these MFIs have a dual nature and
face a “double bottom line” (Yaron, 1994): a financial bottom line that is to achieve financial
sustainability and self-sufficiency, and a social bottom line that is to financially support individual
business projects. A successful management of MFIs is seen as a simultaneous expansion of both
components without trade-offs between the objectives of financial sustainability and outreach to
the poor (Morduch, 2000).
C
2018 The Authors.
International Transactionsin Operational Research C
2018 International Federation of OperationalResearch Societies

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT