Overcrowding and its impact on prison conditions and health

Pages65-68
Published date11 June 2018
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-04-2018-0014
Date11 June 2018
AuthorMorag MacDonald
Subject MatterHealth & social care,Criminology & forensic psychology,Prisoner health,Sociology,Sociology of crime & law,Public policy & environmental management,Policing,Criminal justice
Morag MacDonald
Overcrowding and its impact on prison conditions and health
Overcrowding has been one of the biggest issues for prisons for many years and we highlighted
this problem in an editorial of IJPH in 2012. However, it is depressing that this remains a serious
problem. Indeed, very little seems to have changed in nearly 30 years. As early as 1990, the
Director General of the English and Welsh Prison Service argued that the removal of
overcrowding is [] an indispensable pre-condition of sustained and universal improvement in
prison conditions. He insisted that for improvement to be solid and service-wide, the canker of
overcrowding must be rooted out(Prison Reform Trust, 2017). Moving on to 2018, Penal
Reform International (2018) was still able to write that:
Overcrowding is an obvious cause of and contributing factor in many of the health issues in prisons,
most notablyinfectious diseasesand mental health issues. Thelatest data shows that 22 nationalprison
systems hold more than doubletheir capacity, with a further 27 countries operatingat 150-200%.
Overcrowded prisons around the world create difficult and widespread challenges to maintaining
prisoner health and providing a safe environment. Overcrowded prisons can lead to insanitary,
violent conditions that are harmful to the physical and mental well-being of prisoners (UNODC,
2013). Staff who are working in overcrowded prisons are also at risk in a range of ways.
They face greater potential violence from the prisoners, threat of infection and increased stress
and mental health issues. Prison officers are, as a recent UK Ministry of Justice (2017a, b, c)
report noted, leaving the Prison Service in significant numbers.
The scale of overcrowding remains huge. In excess of 10.35 million people are held in penal
institutions worldwide, mostly as pre-trial detainees, remand or sentenced prisoners. Walmsleys
11th edition of the World Prison Population List (2016) shows that there is some reduction in the
numbers of people being incarcerated in Europe, North and South America and in part of Africa
and Oceania. However, in the Caribbean, Russia and Turkey, the number of prisoners has
actually increased. In all cases, the number of prisoners is still far too high.
Discussion on the negative consequences of overcrowded prisons is not new and in general
there are two responses: build more prisons or reduce the number of prisoners by using reforms
such as amnesties and early release programmes. Neither of these responses, however, is
successful in long-term reduction of prison populations. The Council of Europe first addressed
the issue of overcrowding in 1999 and, more recently, in a White Paper published in 2016.
The White Paper considers moving away from increasing prison capacity and other short-term
measures and addressing the root causes of overcrowding by making more use of alternatives
to custody and make lesser use of detention in order, among others, to reduce the growth of
prison population(Council of Europe, 2016: V, a, p. 85). The White Paper also recommends
revision of national penal law, decriminalisation of some offences, providing alternative sanctions,
such as community sentences and victim restitution and more rigorous monitoring of prisons by
independent evaluators (Council of Europe, 2016: V, b).
Preventing overcrowding in prisons is a key initiative to rigorously battle the problems and
concerns for prisoner and staff health resulting from the impact of living and working in
overcrowded prisons. Such prevention measures can include providing programmes to deal
with drug addiction, improve education and employment skills. Both the EU White Paper (2016)
and the UNODC (2013) recommendations to reduce prison overcrowding are broadly similar and
suggest improvements to the judicial systems to encourage efficiency, develop fairer sentencing
policies and promote through-care programmes to increase social reintegration and reduce the
DOI 10.1108/IJPH-04-2018-0014 VOL. 14 NO. 2 2018, pp. 65-68, © Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 1744-9200
j
INTERNATIONALJOURNAL OF PRISONER HEALTH
j
PAG E 65
Editorial

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT