National Institutions, Spatial Differentiation and Race: Variation in Cuba's Political Regime

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.13169/intejcubastud.13.1.0086
Pages86-104
Published date01 July 2021
Date01 July 2021
AuthorJorge I. Domínguez
Subject MatterCuba,National Assembly,Council of State,spatial differentiation,race,elite selection,political regime
InternatIonal Journal of Cuban StudIeS 13.1 Summer 2021
ACADEMIC ARTICLE
NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, SPATIAL
DIFFERENTIATION AND RACE: VARIATION
IN CUBA’S POLITICAL REGIME
Jorge I. Domínguez
Jorge I. Domínguez was formerly a professor (1972–2018) at Harvard University. He has
published numerous books and papers on Cuban politics and society. Website https://
jorgeidominguez.com
Abstract
Does territorial variation matter for institutional inclusion, how do officials discuss it
and, given racial heterogeneity, how do interacting spatial and racial variations affect
institutional design? This article examines the spatial anchoring of Cuba’s Council of State
members in 2003, 2008, 2013 and 2018. There has been little official public discussion
regarding Council member territorial districts. Fidel Castro’s presidency scored low
on spatial inclusion, displaying marked territorial disparities in Council membership.
Such disparities narrowed under Raúl Castro and Miguel Díaz-Canel, improving spatial
inclusion. Selectors have also decoupled racial and territorial factors in choosing Council
members. Relative to each province’s Afrodescendant population share, there have
been more Afrodescendant Council members than demographically to be expected
in Afrodescendant-minority provinces. Through 2013 Council Afrodescendants were
fewer than demographically to be expected in the three Afrodescendant-majority
provinces. Only in 2018 did Afrodescendant population shares and Council membership
shares match in Afrodescendant-majority provinces.
Keywords: Cuba, National Assembly, Council of State, spatial differentiation, race,
elite selection, political regime
How do states take territorial variation into account in the design of institutions
that purport to be broadly inclusive of its citizenry? How salient are spatial
NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, SPATIAL DIFFERENTIATION AND RACE 87
IJCS Produced and distributed by Pluto Journals www.plutojournals.com/ijcs/
differences in official discourse regarding such institutional inclusion? In racially
heterogeneous populations, how do interactions between spatial and racial vari-
ations affect institutional design choices?
Cuba’s design of its constitutional institutions poses these questions well. Its
elections to the National Assembly (parliament) are uncompetitive: the number
of candidates for election equals the number of legislative posts to be filled.
Therefore, Communist Party of Cuba leaders (Partido Comunista de Cuba,
PCC) have emphasised dimensions of institutional inclusion other than accom-
modating political critics. The Assembly’s design incorporates territoriality; its
membership is proportionate to shares of the nation’s population, organised in
districts and provinces. The Council of State is the Assembly’s executive commit-
tee; only Assembly Deputies may belong to the Council. In addition, Cuba dis-
plays racial heterogeneity across its provinces, but Afrodescendants are a
majority of the population in the three easternmost provinces and almost half of
the people in the City of Havana.
This article examines the spatial anchoring of members of Cuba’s Council of
State in 2003 (Fidel Castro’s, henceforth F. Castro, last Council), 2008 and 2013
(Raúl Castro’s, henceforth R. Castro, Councils), and 2018 (Miguel Díaz-Canel’s
first Council). A new Council membership was selected on each of those years
following a noncompetitive National Assembly election. There was a lack of
official public discussion regarding the territorial origins of Council members
and their marked territorial disparities. Spatial inclusion was especially problem-
atic during Fidel Castro’s last Council presidency. Such territorial disparities
narrowed under the Raúl Castro and Miguel Díaz-Canel Council presidencies,
thereby improving spatial inclusion, notwithstanding a persistent lack of public
discussion regarding this criterion for inclusion. Selectors of Council members
have also decoupled racial and territorial factors in the configuration of Council
membership across the three presidencies. Relative to each province’s
Afrodescendant population share, there have been more Afrodescendant Council
members than demographically to be expected in Afrodescendant-minority
provinces. Through 2013, Council Afrodescendants were fewer than demo-
graphically to be expected in the three Afrodescendant-majority provinces. Only
in 2018 did Afrodescendant population shares and Council membership shares
match in Afrodescendant-majority provinces.
Comparative Context
How do other states accommodate territorial and ethnic heterogeneity? In the
rationalist tradition, Riker (1964) argued that federalism is one solution to the
organisation of territorial politics, especially in large countries with democratic

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT