Measuring the quality of life of incarcerated individuals

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-02-2018-0005
Published date11 March 2019
Date11 March 2019
Pages1-13
AuthorAshley Elizabeth Muller,Anne Bukten
Subject MatterHealth & social care,Criminology & forensic psychology,Prisoner health,Sociology,Sociology of crime & law,Public policy & environmental management,Policing,Criminal justice
Measuring the quality of life of
incarcerated individuals
Ashley Elizabeth Muller and Anne Bukten
Abstract
Purpose Measuring quality of life (QoL) under incarceration can be used to track successful rehabilitation
and risk of re-offending. However, few studies have measured QoL among general incarcerated populations,
and it is important to use psychometrically strong measures that pose minimal burdens to respondents and
administrators. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach The aim of this analysis was to explore the utility of a short generic tool
measuring overall QoL, the QOL5, in an incarcerated population. The authors drew data from the
Norwegian Offender Mental Health and Addiction Study, a cross-sectional survey of 1,499 individuals from
Norwegian prisons.
Findings Factor analysis suggested a unidimensional structure that explained 53.2 percent of variance in
QoL scores. Intrascale correlations were high and internal consistency was acceptable (α¼0.764). The
QOL5 was strongly correlated with mental health, moderately correlated with exercise frequency and weakly
correlated with ward security.
Practical implications The QOL5 is a short measure that presents minimal burden to respondents and
administrators. The authors recommend its further use in incarcerated populations to measure overall QoL as
well as cross-cultural adaptation and validation in more languages.
Originality/value In this analysis of the largest published sample to date of incarcerated individuals and
their QoL, the QOL5 appears to be an acceptable and valid measure of overall QoL.
Keywords Prisoners, Quality of life, Wellbeing, Mental health, Psychometrics, Health promoting prison
Paper type Research paper
1. Background
In a rehabilitative approach to incarceration, incarceration should help individuals re-integrate into
society, rather than make them suffer and reduce their quality of life (QoL) (Dore, 2010). The
Good Lives Model is a recently developed theory of rehabilitation that illuminates the role of
measuring QoL in the incarceration process. Offending is conceptualized as a result of lacking
the capabilities to achieve a good and personally meaningful life in safe, functional and socially
acceptable ways (Ward et al., 2007). Poor QoL upon incarceration can reflect the lack of a good
lifethat may have prompted offending and improved QoL upon release may be seen as an
indicator of both successful rehabilitation and reduced risk of re-offending.
Norway has embraced a rehabilitative philosophy, and the official approach to incarceration is
that the restriction of liberty while incarcerated shall be the only right taken away. Inmates should
complete their periods of incarceration better equipped to participate in society and with
improved QoL (NCS, 2017).
QoL is a subjective outcome that has been standardly collected in the healthcare system
for several decade s. One influential d efinition of overal l QoL is an individual sperception of
their position in l ife in the context of th e culture and value sy stems in which they li ve and in
relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns(WHOQOL Group, 1996). When
measured multi-d imensionally, overall QoL of ten incorporates health, soc ial and environmental
domains, differentiating it from the narrower concept of health-related QoLwhich this paper
Received 8 February 2018
Revised 23 April 2018
Accepted 30 May 2018
Ashley Elizabeth Muller is
based at the Norwegian Centre
for Addiction Research,
Institute of Clinical Medicine,
University of Oslo,
Oslo, Norway and
the Norwegian Institute of
Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Anne Bukten is based at the
Norwegian Centre for
Addiction Research, Institute of
Clinical Medicine, University of
Oslo, Oslo, Norway;
Division for Mental Health and
Addiction, Oslo University
Hospital, Oslo, Norway and
The Correctional Service of
Norway Staff Academy,
Oslo, Norway.
DOI 10.1108/IJPH-02-2018-0005 VOL. 15 NO. 1 2019, pp. 1-13, © Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 1744-9200
j
INTERNATIONALJOURNAL OF PRISONER HEALTH
j
PAG E 1

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT