Lending Rate Spread Shock and Monetary Policy Arrangements: A Small Open Economy Model for ASEAN Countries

Published date01 March 2014
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12023
Date01 March 2014
AuthorTaiyo Yoshimi
Lending Rate Spread Shock and Monetary
Policy Arrangements: A Small Open Economy
Model for ASEAN Countries*
Taiyo Yoshimi
Received 14 June 2012; accepted 30 September 2013
We investigate the welfare implications of monetary policy arrangements in a small
open economy, considering firms’ bank-based finances that are widely observed in
emerging ASEAN countries. The impact of an unexpected change in the lending
rate spread, or a lending rate spread shock, depends on the presence of banking
activity in the economy. This presence is important in Malaysia and Vietnam,
where welfare effects of this type of shock are at least comparable to those
of foreign monetary policy shocks. We also find that a rigid exchange rate
arrangement amplifies the effect of a shock.
JEL classification: E52, F33, F41.
Keywords: small open economy, lending rate spread, monetary policy, ASEAN.
doi: 10.1111/asej.12023
I. Introduction
It is widely recognized that monetary transmissions crucially depend on the state
of financial market development and the ways firms handle their external
finances. In countries that lack well-functioning securities markets, credit chan-
nels are important. This tendency is observed in the vast majority of emerging
countries, and ASEAN is a good example. For instance, Subhanij (2010) finds
that firms’ external finances in ASEAN countries are still bank-based, although
the roles of capital markets and non-bank financial institutions have become
increasingly important. Furthermore, studies such as Chua (2003), Cull and Pería
*Department of Economics, Nanzan University, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8673, Japan. Email:
yoshimi@ic.nanzan-u.ac.jp. I have benefited from discussions with and the comments of Hiroshi
Gunji, Kenji Iwata, Vu Tuan Khai, Shigeto Kitano, Chikafumi Nakamura, Eiji Okano, Eiji Ogawa and
Tsutomu Watanabe. I would also like to thank the seminar participants at Hitotsubashi University, the
Research Institute of Capital Formation, the Development Bank of Japan and Thailand Development
Research Institute, and the participants at the Regular Meeting of Nanzan Academic Society in
December 2010 and October 2011, the Chubu area study group meeting of the Japan Society of
Monetary Economics in March 2011, the Nagoya Macroeconomics Workshop in March 2011, the
Nagoya International Economics Study Group in October 2011, the annual meeting of The Japan
Society of International Economics in October 2011, the fall Meeting of the Japanese Economic
Association in October 2011, and the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) Conference
in December 2011. All remaining errors are mine. This work was supported by a Japan Society for the
Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (24730280).
bs_bs_banner
Asian Economic Journal 2014, Vol. 28 No. 1, 19–39 19
© 2014 The Author
Asian Economic Journal © 2014 East Asian Economic Association and Wiley Publishing Pty Ltd
(2007) and Rajan and Gopalan (2009) find that the share of assets held by foreign
banks is around 10 percent of total banking sector assets on average in emerging
Asian economies. Moreover, shares have not increased remarkably, although the
restrictions on foreign bankers’ participation were eliminated in most countries
after the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s. This contrasts with the averages
of other emerging nations, such as Central and Eastern European Countries
(CEEC) and Latin American countries, which are around 40 percent. This implies
that most firms in ASEAN countries rely on domestic banks for their external
finances. In this research, we investigate the welfare implications of monetary
policy arrangements in a small open economy where firms depend on domestic
bankers for their external finances in order to draw a direct parallel with emerging
ASEAN countries.
Many researchers have previously dealt with monetary policy issues in emerg-
ing ASEAN economies. Devereux et al. (2006) is one of the most influential works
in the literature on this topic. They examine monetary policy in a small open
economy with lending constraints on investment financing and incomplete
exchange rate pass-through, and find that the degree of pass-through affects the
welfare dominance of alternative monetary policy rules. Elekdag et al. (2006)
construct a model considering financial accelerator and external finances denomi-
nated in foreign currency to discuss policy issues in emerging economies. Tanboon
(2008) constructs a model that replicates the economic situation in Thailand.
The difference between these works and ours is the consideration of firms’
bank-based finances. Agénor and Montiel (2008) also consider firms’ bank-based
finances in a small open economy, and obtain analytical insight into several
monetary policy issues. Our approach is more of a basic DSGE numerical inves-
tigation, such as that in Gali and Monacelli (2005) and Faia and Monacelli (2008).
We introduce bank-based finances in a simple way into a standard small open
economy model, and investigate the welfare implications for each ASEAN
country. A variety of models take into account firms’ external finances. To
understand monetary transmissions through so-called cost channels, Ravenna and
Walsh (2006) assume that firms borrow labor costs from intermediaries at the
gross nominal interest rate and find a significant quantitative role of this channel.
We follow Goodfriend and McCallum (2007) and Cúrdia and Woodford (2010)
and posit a simple production function pertaining to the management of lending
activity by the commercial bank. As we assume countries lack well-functioning
securities markets and focus just on bank-based external finances, we prefer their
specification to those suggested in the financial-accelerator literature, such as in
Bernanke et al. (1996).
Furthermore, we refer to the data of emerging ASEAN countries to calibrate
the financial parameters in our model. As well as considering the bank-based
financial behavior of firms, we focus on the effect of a lending rate spread shock,
found to be important by researchers such as Agénor et al. (2008). Agénor et al.
(2008) examine Argentina and discuss the importance of this type of shock for its
business cycle. Neumeyer and Perri (2005), Tchakarov and Elekdag (2006) and
ASIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL 20
© 2014 The Author
Asian Economic Journal © 2014 East Asian Economic Association and Wiley Publishing Pty Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT