Labour law violations in Chile
Author | Ravi KANBUR,Lucas RONCONI,Leigh WEDENOJA |
Date | 01 December 2013 |
Published date | 01 December 2013 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2013.00187.x |
International Labour Review, Vol. 152 (2013), No. 3–4
Copyright © The authors 2013
Journal compilation © International Labour Organization 2013
Labour law violations in Chile
Ravi KANBUR,* Lucas RONCONI** and Leigh WEDENOJA***
Abstract. This empirical contribution to the quantication of labour law viola-
tion uses micro survey data to examine compliance with workers’ statutory entitle-
ments to a minimum wage, working time limits, a written contract, and pension
coverage over the period 1990–200 9. One-third of workers were denied at least
one of these entitlements, albeit with signicant variations in the incidence of vio-
lations over time, across laws and by worker and rm characteristics. The authors’
econometric analysis shows that compliance rates are lower for female, foreign-
born, indigenous and less educated workers, and in smaller rms and agricultural
regions. Further research, they argue, should focus on enforcement.
R
eform of labour law is central to policy discourse in developing countries,
and in Latin America in particular. Proponents of deregulation argue
that overly stringent legislation feeds informality and serves to hold back ef-
ciency and growth. Opponents of deregulation argue instead that these laws
curtail the power of employers and protect workers.1 However, both propo-
nents and opponents seem to argue equally from an assumption of effective en-
forcement of labour laws. At least, they do not focus on issues of enforcement
or violation of laws. In the extreme case, if the laws are not enforced at all, then
the deregulators have the outcome they want by default and their opposition
to the current laws is somewhat tangential. Even if violation is partial, both
proponents and opponents will have to modify their arguments accordingly.
But how much labour law violation is there? The question is at heart an
empirical one, dependent on context and institutions. A growing body of lit-
erature has attempted to quantify compliance.2 The broad conclusion is that
compliance is far from complete, and the incidence of violations varies across
countries and across regions and sectors within countries.
* Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, email: sk145@cornell.edu. ** Centro de Investigación
y Acción Social (CIAS), Buenos Aires, email: ronconilucas@gmail.com. *** Cornell University,
Ithaca, NY, email: lrw55@cornell.edu.
Responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles rests solely with their authors, and
publication does not constitute an endorsement by the ILO.
1 See World Bank (2012) for a recent review of the literature.
2
See, for example, Strobl and Walsh (2003), Maloney and Nuñez Mendez (2004), Kristensen
and Cunningham (2006), Andalón and Pagés (2008), Ronconi (2010), and Bhorat, Kanbur and
Mayet (2012a).
To continue reading
Request your trial