Knowledge Spillovers from FDI: A Critical Review from the International Business Perspective

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12054
Date01 January 2016
Published date01 January 2016
AuthorAlessandra Perri,Enzo Peruffo
Knowledge Spillovers from FDI:
A Critical Review from the International
Business Perspective
Alessandra Perri and Enzo Peruffo1
Department of Management, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, 30121 Venice, Italy, and 1Department of Business
and Management, LUISS Guido Carli, Viale Romania 32, 00197 Rome, Italy
Corresponding author email: alessandra.perri@unive.it
This paper reviews and organizes the theoretical and empirical research on foreign
direct investment (FDI) knowledge spillovers from the international business perspec-
tive. In doing so, it develops a framework for the analysis of this phenomenon. The
suggested FDI knowledge spillover framework integrates both the macro-level
(country,industry, institutions) and micro-level (multinational firm, headquarters, sub-
sidiary, local firms) antecedents of spillovers with their consequences, and proposes to
analyse spillovers along three main attributes that characterize their occurrence, i.e.
their magnitude, scope and speed.
Introduction
A half-century of foreign direct investment (FDI)
spillover research has led to the development of
many different perspectiveson the topic. The benefits
arising from foreign investment by multinational
firms are a matter of considerable importance for
host countries. When multinational corporations
(MNCs) locate their activities abroad, they channel
capital inflows, raise local employment and bring
technological and managerial expertise to the host
economy.
As recently stated by Eden (2009a, p. 1065), the
literature on the impact of FDI on host countries
tends to be dominated by economists’. Indeed, while
many of the consequences of private investment from
abroad are relevant for the objectives of research on
growth and international economics-related issues,
they go beyond the scope of management studies. For
example, the analysis of the direct welfare effects
originating from increased levels of capital stock or
employment generated by FDI does not fall within
the aims of managerial research. However, the locali-
zation of MNC subsidiaries is associated with several
other indirect effects that are more ‘micro-founded’.
These effects deal with the extent to which the stra-
tegic interaction between foreign and local firms
alters their relative competitive positions, owing to
the impact of knowledge spillovers. Knowledge
spillovers (KSs) can be defined as informal flows of
technological knowledge from foreign to local firms
(Eapen 2012). Although other types of FDI externali-
ties exist, this study focuses specifically on this
effect. In fact, the FDI knowledge spillover effect
(FDI-KSE) is of great interest for management and
international business (IB) scholars (Driffield and
Love 2007; Meyer 2004), for at least two reasons:
first, because it depends critically on the actions and
strategies of both domestic and foreign firms (Chang
and Xu 2008; Giroud 2012), and is therefore not
outside the control of managerial theory and prac-
tice; second, because its understanding allows
comprehensive evaluation of the costs and benefits
The authors would like to thank Ram Mudambi, Grazia
Santangelo, the associate editor TimEdwards and the anony-
mous reviewersfor their constr uctivecomments and sugges-
tions on previous versions of the paper.
© 2014 British Academy of Management and JohnWiley & Sons Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd,9600 Garsington
Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA
International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 18, 3–27 (2016)
DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12054
bs_bs_banner
that domestic and foreign firms may reap when they
come into contact (Chang and Xu 2008; Sanna
Randaccio and Veugelers 2007).
In spite of its relevance, there is limited consoli-
dation of the FDI knowledge spillover (FDI-KS)
research in the IB literature. Most studies on FDI
externalities have adopted a ‘host-country’ perspec-
tive in the attempt to analyse the conditions under
which advanced MNCs can sustain the growth of
less developed contexts. However, when focusing on
knowledge-based spillovers, the perspective of
foreign firms becomes equally important. Because
knowledge is the firm’s most strategic resource
(Grant 1996), its diffusion may seriously endanger
foreign firms’ competitive position. Therefore, espe-
cially when investing in developed countries where
domestic agents are likely to be provided with high
absorptive capacity, foreign firms are not indifferent
to the risk of spilling their knowledge to local coun-
terparts (Perri et al. 2013).
In order to account properly for the perspective
of foreign firms, some authors have highlighted the
need to frame the FDI-KSE more explicitly in
IB literature (Eden 2009a; Meyer 2004). This paper
goes in the same direction by undertaking a system-
atic review of the FDI-KS research from the IB per-
spective. In doing so, we build on a special issue of
the European Journal of Development Research
(Vol. 24, 2012) on FDI-assisted development, which
suggests that FDI-KSs are governed by the interac-
tion among variables operating at different levels of
analysis (e.g. firm, context, institutions) (Narula and
Driffield 2012). Following this multilevel approach,
we develop a framework for the analysis of FDI-KSs,
which incorporates relevant antecedents and conse-
quences. We categorize antecedents along two main
dimensions: (1) a macro-level of analysis (including
determinants related to countries, industries, culture
and institutions); and (2) a micro-level of analysis
(including determinants related to the headquarters
and the MNC, the subsidiary and the local firms).
While other literature reviews exist on the topic of
FDI spillovers (Crespo and Fontoura 2007; Görg and
Greenaway 2004), they have focused mainly on the
growth opportunities that relatively backward host
countries may seize from the presence of advanced
foreign firms, thus overlooking the importance of
competitive interaction, central to our framework,
and underplaying the perspective of foreign firms.
By adopting an IB standpoint, we explicitly take into
account the role that foreign firms and, more specifi-
cally, their subsidiaries may play in shaping the pat-
terns of FDI-KSs through their own strategies.
Hence, we contribute to the literature on FDI-KSs by
analysing this phenomenon from the perspective of
foreign firms, and by focusing on subsidiaries as
strategizing actors in the spillover process. Moreover,
we identify and systematically define a set of FDI-KS
attributes: namely, magnitude, scope and speed. We
propose that such key FDI-KS attributes can be used
in future empirical studies.1Specifically, by includ-
ing the speed of FDI-KSs in this research model, we
highlight the importance of assuming a dynamic
view of this phenomenon. While traditional theories
of spillovers are mainly static, analysing FDI-KSs
from an IB perspective implies focusing on how they
evolve over time. In fact, because the sustainability
of a competitive advantage critically depends on the
time to imitation of product and process innovations
(Zander and Kogut 1995), the speed at which local
firms are able to intercept MNC knowledge is an
important factor influencing the extent to which FDI-
KSs can in reality harm a foreign firm’s competi-
tive position and, symmetrically, benefit domestic
companies.
The paper is structured as follows. First, we define
different types of FDI spillovers, and provide justifi-
cation for our focus on knowledge-based spillovers.
Second, we review existing literature on the anteced-
ents and consequences of the phenomenon, high-
lighting the main contributions and limitations of
these studies. Finally, we integrate previous findings
with new perspectives into a framework for the thor-
ough understanding and further investigation of
FDI-KSs.
MNCs, knowledge and FDI spillovers
A number of studies suggest that FDI triggers a
broad array of effects on both the MNC host and the
home country (Lipsey 2004). Given their importance
for economic growth, the literature has investigated
these effects widely, identifying the existence of
product market effects, arising when FDI drives
MNCs to modify the quantity of goods they buy or
sell in their home and host country, and factor market
effects, occurring when MNCs change their demand
for capital and labour both in their host economy and
1This is consistent with the approach of Jindra et al. (2009).
In their study on linkages, the authors highlight the impor-
tance of defining linkage attributes as a way to improve
scholars’ ability to assess linkage impact.
© 2014 British Academy of Management and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
4A. Perri and E. Peruffo

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT