Interprofessional working: adoption assessments for people living with HIV

Published date11 September 2017
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-02-2017-0005
Pages277-287
Date11 September 2017
AuthorTam Pheona Chipawe Cane
Subject MatterHealth & social care,Vulnerable groups,Inequalities & diverse/minority groups,Sociology,Race & ethnic studies,Minorities,Multiculturalism,Racial identity,Work, economy & organizations
Interprofessional working: adoption
assessments for people living with HIV
Tam Pheona Chipawe Cane
Abstract
Purpose The purpose ofthis paper is to propose that interprofessional workingbetween professionals who
work with people living withHIV (PLWHIV ) contributes to improvements in thehealth, social care needs and
long-termoutcomes of PLWHIV. Interprofessionalworking initiatives have been usefulin promoting successful
frameworks used towards improving various aspects of the HIV disease family planning and transmission
prevention. The paper proposes that interprofessional working is important in elevating stigma and
discrimination that sometimes prevent PLWHIV from successfully achieving parenthood through adoption.
The objective of thisstudy is to contribute to social work practice and literature thatsupports adoption.
Design/methodology/approach This paper draws on an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)
study looking at the experiences of PLWHIV going through the adoption process. The study relied on
in-depth interviews with six PLWHIV who had gone through the adoption process and presented views
regarding a need for better collaborative working by those assessing PLWHIV going through adoption.
The sample was purpose and homogeneous. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using IPA
framework. Transcripts had been written up and analysed individually. Following which a cross-case analysis
to create meaning and conceptual understanding that was common among all cases.
Findings Drawing on themes around interprofessional working, this paper argues that there is a needfor
improved and transparent interprofessional working models within adoption systems. The paper provides
conceptualunderstanding around interprofessional workingand how this can be brought aboutto support the
needs of PLWHIVseeking to adopt children. Itproposes that working in isolationwill leave PLWHIV feelingthat
the adoption processis ambiguous and unfair, yet efforts tocombat this are evident in healthcare settings.
Research limitations/implications Limitations to this study include an acceptable but small convenience
sample within IPA methodological approaches. This is a hard to reach sample and results may not
be generalisable.
Practical implications This paper opens a dialogue for discussing issues around the adoption for
PLWHIV and informing professionals about increasing opportunities for PLWHIV to adopt children where
there is a high demand for adoptive parents.
Social implications Placing the views of participants in this study within the body of knowledge could
influence meaningful collaboration between adoption social workers and those supporting PLWHIV within
health, social care and voluntary sectors. This may influence change and reduce stigma and barriers
preventing some PLWHIV from successfully adopting children.
Originality/value This paper meets an identified need to explore how PLWHIV can be supported to
achieve parenthood. The paper expands on existing knowledge around the need to provide fertility treatment
to PLWHIV. It suggests that child adoption can be promoted through child adoption and ultimately promoting
normalcy around the desires of PLWHIV to achieve parenthood using non-traditional methods of conception.
Keywords HIV, Adoption, Interpretative phenomenological analysis, Interprofessional working
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
In 2013, approximately 107,800 people were living with HIV infection in the UK. Of these, 3,710
had CD4 count levels above 500 cells/mm
3
; they adhered to antiretroviral treatment and
were living steadily (Public Health England, 2014). Those with suppressed viral loads may not
require treatment and may live normal lives. The prevalence of HIV falls within the reproductive
age range of 15-59 years. It is likely that men and women in this group will consider parenthood,
be it naturally or through surrogacy or adoption (Gerrand, 2012). More recent work by
Received 10 February 2017
Revised 30 May 2017
12 July 2017
Accepted 12 July 2017
Declaration of interest: there are
no conflicts of interest. This paper
is drawn from a doctoral thesis
and some concepts may be linked
to other papers to be published in
due course. The doctoral thesis
was subject to peer review by way
of a supervisory support and
internal and external examinations.
The author alone is responsible for
this particular paper.
The author is grateful to all
participants living with HIV who
took part in this study, the
Terrence Higgins Trust, and
African Eye for helping to promote
this study. The author thanks all
the agencies and charitable
organisations supporting PLWHIV
who helped promote this study.
Tam Pheona Chipawe Cane is
a Senior Lecturer and
Programme Leader at the
Department of Psychology,
Social Work and Counselling,
University of Greenwich,
London, UK.
DOI 10.1108/IJHRH-02-2017-0005 VOL. 10 NO. 4 2017, pp.277-287, © Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 2056-4902
j
INTERNATIONALJOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN HEALTHCARE
j
PAGE277

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT