Intellectual property and the African continental free trade area: lessons and recommendations for the IP protocol
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-09-2021-0051 |
Published date | 04 March 2022 |
Date | 04 March 2022 |
Pages | 105-121 |
Subject Matter | Strategy,International business,International business law,Economics,International economics,International trade |
Author | Caroline B. Ncube |
Intellectual property and the
African continental free trade area:
lessons and recommendations for
the IP protocol
Caroline B. Ncube
Department of Commercial Law, University of Cape Town,
Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract
Purpose –This paper aims to explore the contours of the future intellectual property (IP) protocol of the
African ContinentalFree Trade Area (AfCFTA) Agreement.
Design/methodology/approach –This paper frames the IP protocol within the architecture of the
AfCFTA Agreement, meaning that it will follow the structure of other protocols and willbe guided by the
Agreement’s foundational principles and objectives. With the place, shape and form of the protocol so
established, the paper considers the substantive aspects that ought to be addressed. It also considers
provisionson technical assistance, capacity building and cooperation.
Findings –The paper finds that the Tripartite FreeTrade Phase 2 IP agenda is a credible starting place,
which must be broadened to better meet gendered challenges and the continent’s developmental priorities.
This will entail includingprovisions on specific aspects enumerated in the paper, which must be aligned with
provisions on technical assistance, capacity building and cooperation to enhance implementation. The best
outcomes in the negotiation,adoption and implementation of the IP protocol will be achieved by an inclusive
approach incorporating all national, sub-regional and regional institutions guided by coherent policy and
coordinatedto ensure efficiency in resources and capacity mobilisation.
Originality/value –To the best of the author’s knowledge, thisis the first paper to formally consider both
the architectureand substantive provisions of the future AfCFTA IP protocol with specific focus on gendered
dimensions.
Keywords Intellectual property, Gender, African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA)
Paper type Research paper
© Caroline B. Ncube. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and
create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to
full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at
http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
This work was carried out under the auspices of the SARChI Chair: Intellectual Property,
Innovation and Development, University of Cape Town. This work is based on research supported in
part by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (Grant number: 115716). Any
opinion, finding and conclusion or recommendation expressed in this material is that of the author
and the NRF does not accept any liability in this regard.
This work also constitutes part of the Open African Innovation Research (OpenAIR) partnership’s
thematic research. OpenAIR work is carried out with financial support from the International
Development Research Centre, Canada, the Social Sciencesand Humanities Research Council of
Canada, and Queen Elizabeth Scholarships –Advanced Scholars (QES-AS) through Community
Foundations of Canada (CFC). The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of Open
AIR’s funders.
Intellectual
property
105
Received21 September 2021
Revised20 November 2021
Accepted17 December 2021
Journalof International Trade
Lawand Policy
Vol.21 No. 2, 2022
pp. 105-121
EmeraldPublishing Limited
1477-0024
DOI 10.1108/JITLP-09-2021-0051
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
https://www.emerald.com/insight/1477-0024.htm
1. Introduction
Intellectual property(IP) is currently high on the African Union (AU)’s agenda because of its
prominence in the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) as the focus of current
negotiations, which will result in the adoption of a protocol. The AfCFTA is a significant
milestone towards the realisation of the African regionaltrade agenda, which has a history
dating back to 1963 (Desta and Gérout, 2018, p. 113). A detailed overview historical
developments will not be repeated here. Suffice it to say that the vision and goal of
integration seeded at the very foundations of the AU’s predecessor, the Organisation of
African Unity (OAU) is coming to fruition. Significant milestones include the Agreement
establishing the AfCFTA (AfCFTA Agreement)’s entry into force on 30 May 2019 [1] and
the start of trading under the agreement on 1 January 2021 (AU, 2020a). Article 7 of the
AfCFTA Agreement provides for the conclusionof Phase 2 negotiations on IP rights (IPRs)
and investment competition policy.Since the conclusion of the AfCFTA Agreement, the AU
resolved to add e-commerce to anotherround of negotiations, which together with the Phase
2 negotiations should be completed by 31 December 2021 (AU, 2020b). Indeed, because the
agreement is member-driven, one may envisage the conclusion of further instruments as
determined by AU member states in the future. There are already strong indicationsthat a
Protocol on Women, Youth and SMEs will be negotiated next (Erasmus, 2021). Article 8
states that the further negotiation legal texts, once concluded, will augment the Agreement
by “upon adoption, form[ing] an integral part”ofthe Agreement and becoming “part of the
single undertaking, subject to entry into force”.The formula for entry into force is set out in
Article 23 as follows:
“The Protocols on Investment, Intellectual Property Rights, Competition Policy and
any other Instrument within the scope of this Agreement deemed necessary, shall
enter into force thirty (30) days after the deposit of the twenty second (22nd)
instrument of ratification”(para 2).
“For Member States acceding to the Protocols on Investment, Intellectual Property
Rights, Competition Policy, and any other Instrument within the scope of this
Agreement deemed necessary, shall enter into force on the date of the deposit of its
instrument of accession”(para 4).
Beyond the above, the AfCFTA Agreement contains minimal provisions on IP. Article 4(c)
states that the state parties “shallcooperate”on IPRs. Clearly, the protocol on IPRs (hereafter
IP protocol) will provide the requisitedetails on the nature of that co-operation and will have
a significant impact on the regulationof IPRs on the African continent within the contextof
intra-Africa trade.Therefore, it is worthy of scholarly commentary.
This paper will proceed by discussing the form and general nature of AfCFTA Agreement
Protocols to give insight into what shape the IP protocol may take in Section 2. Section 3 will
focus on the possible provisions of the IP protocol. It will include subsections on the various
parts to be included in the protocol and such discussion will include some commentary on the
process to be followed in the negotiation. In this respect, it will refer to experiences gleaned
from the negotiation of other trade agreements to ascertain which lessons can be drawn for the
AfCFTA IP protocol. It is important to stress the importance of mainstreaming gender
considerations into the discussion of the AfCFTA Agreement and its protocols, which are an
integral part of it. The rationale for paying special attention to women, along with youth and
small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) is that they form the core of the continent’s
economically active population and are the drivers of trade, both within national borders and
across borders. Oft-quoted statistics are that women account for “70% of informal cross border
traders”and SMEs constitute “80% of the region’s businesses”(Luke, 2019,p.9).Africaisa
JITLP
21,2
106
To continue reading
Request your trial