Inflating profits and industry competitiveness

Date01 September 2019
AuthorSugata Marjit,Hamid Beladi,Reza Oladi
Published date01 September 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/ijet.12185
doi: 10.1111/ijet.12185
Inflating profits and industry competitiveness
Hamid Beladi,Sugata Marjitand Reza Oladi
We provide a theoretical model in which managers inflate actual profits to attract capital and
shareholders cannot monitor such actions. We focus on the role of market competition in
cross-industry difference in financial performance overstatement. We show that the degree of
competition negatively affects the extent of overstatement.
Key wor ds inflating profit, competition, corporate governance
JEL classification G30, L1
Accepted 31 May2017
1 Introduction
The agency problem has been extensively modeled and utilized in analyzing the behavior of agents.
The literature has addressed various aspects of this problem – see, for example, Hart (1995) on cor-
porate governance and more recently Batabyal (2012) and Chau and Kanbur(2013) on contracting.
At the heart of the problem are the separation of ownership and control, and the lack of monitoring
(see Batabyal 2012; Hu and Yang 2014). These may result in the undesirable outcome that managers
of a public company pursue their own interests at the expense of those of their shareholders. This is
also corroborated by the fact that firms lose value once the announcement of restatements is made
(see Agrawal and Chadha 2005; Hu et al. 2014). Given that the enforced policy of restatement causes
an immediate decline in firm value, it is reasonable to assume that shareholders, specifically small
stakeholders, tend to believe disclosures announced by the managers.
Todeal with the agency problem, various corporate governance mechanisms have been discussed
in the literature such as monitoring, voting by shareholders or their representatives on the board
of directors, large shareholders or proxy fights. In addition, in the context of this classical agency
problem, some authors consider the role of competition as well as mergers and acquisition – see, for
example, Hart (1983) on the role of competition and Grossman and Hart (1980) on the effects of
the agency problem on takeover bids.
In this paper we consider a differentproblem in which managers may overstate their performance,
enticing shareholders to put in additional capital. An (overstated) increase in the announced profit
College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio, USA.
Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta, India, and CES-Ifo, Munich,Germany.
Department of Applied Economics, Utah State University,Logan, Utah, USA. Email: reza.oladi@usu.edu
We are grateful to an anonymous referee and the editor for their suggestions. Hamid Beladi acknowledges generous
support from the Janey S. Briscoe endowment. Sugata Marjit acknowledges financial support from the RBI endowment
at CSSSC and is indebted to FerdinandGul for many fruitful discussions on the topic. He is also grateful for the academic
hospitality of the School of Economics at the University of Queensland. RezaOladi is gr atefulfor financial suppor t from
Utah Agricultural Experiment Station.
International Journal of Economic Theory (2018) 1–7 © IAET 1
International Journal of Economic Theory
International Journal of Economic Theory 15 (2019) 281–287 © IAET 281

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT