Impacts of Road Access on Subjective Well‐being in Timor‐Leste

AuthorRommel Rabanal,Aekapol Chongvilaivan,Kiyoshi Taniguchi
Date01 March 2016
Published date01 March 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12086
Impacts of Road Access on Subjective Well-being
in Timor-Leste
Aekapol Chongvilaivan, Kiyoshi Taniguchi and Rommel Rabanal
Received 6 January 2015; accepted 26 November 2015
The impacts of access to roads on subjective well-being at the household level are
empirically examined using Timor-Lestes nationally representative surveys. This
paper examines not only the quantity, but also the quality of road infrastructure
and, thus, extends existing studies that only consider the benets of road accessibil-
ity. It is found that proximity to main roads may not necessarily result in improved
welfare. Instead, ensuring all-weather access to roads appears to be a more signi-
cant factor in raising household well-being. Specically, road accessibility during
the rainy season reduces the probability of households reporting a less than ade-
quate(low satisfaction) response by 1325 percent. This suggests that in Timor-
Leste, and likely in other developing economies under similar conditions, mainte-
nance of existing roads is more essential to well-being than building more roads.
Keywords: economic development, road access, subjective well-being.
JEL classication codes: I30, O18, R40.
doi: 10.1111/asej.12086
I. Introduction
An efcient and reliable road network that effectively links people, opportunities
and markets can place an economy in the fast lane on the road toward develop-
ment. The ultimate goal of development is to raise the well-being of a society
through improvements in social, political and economic conditions. To realize this
goal, transport infrastructure investment is among the main government interven-
tions used to underpin a push toward development. The argument rests with a
straightforward logic that transportation infrastructure (e.g. roads, railways, sea-
ports and airports) broadens economic opportunities by creating markets, linking
factors of production and connecting value chains. Transport infrastructure is also
used intensively by all economic groups, resulting in more inclusive economic
* Chongvilaivan (corresponding author): Southeast Asia Department, Asian Development Bank, 6
ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, the Philippines. Email: achongvilaivan@adb.
org. Taniguchi:Private Sector Operations Department, Asian Development Bank. Rabanal: Pacic De-
partment, Asian Development Bank. This paper beneted from constructive comments from the Edi-
tors, anonymous referees, and participants at the 14th East Asian Economic Association Meeting in
Bangkok. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reect
the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank or its Board of Governors or the governments
they represent.
© 2016 East Asian Economic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
Asian Economic Journal 2016, Vol.30 No. 1, 91114 91
bs_bs_banner
opportunities stemming from the enhanced mobility of people, production inputs
and information when infrastructure is improved. As such, policy is often directed
to increase the number of roads. The present study maintains that the rehabilita-
tion of existing roads could also be welfare-enhancing.
The present paper is among th e very rst attempts at empirically investigating
the relationship between road access and subjective well-being, using a nationally
representative household-level survey from Timor-Leste; namely, the 2007
Timor-Leste Survey of Living Standards (TSLS).
1
The salient feature of our
empirical exercise is that the notion of road access has two dimensions: quantity
and quality of roads. The former is measured by walk time (minutes) to main
roads as in Brereton et al. (2008), whereas the latter is proxied by whether house-
holds have access to roads during the rainy season and, hence, is in the spirit of
Dercon et al. (2009). In contrast to the past studies, we examine various aspects
of well-being, including adequacy of food, housing, clothing, healthcare, income
and child education, rather than overall life satisfaction. Our empirical framework
builds upon the standard model of ordered outcomes in which road access vari-
ables, together with other household-specic characteristics, enter the subjective
well-being equations. Based on ordered logit and probit estimates, we nd robust
evidence that proximity to roads may not always enhance subjective well-being.
For some aspects like housing and health satisfaction, a shorter walk time to roads
leads to inferior well-being, highlighting potentially unfavorable consequences of
building more roads. Interestingly, access to roads during the rainy season appears
to be a much more signicant contributing factor to subjective well-being in all
respects. Specically, the marginal effects indicate that provision of all-weather
road accessibility reduces the probability of households reporting a less than ad-
equateresponse to subjective measures of well-being by approximately 1325
percent. Furthermore, all-weather access to roads increases the probability of just
adequateand more than adequateresponses by 1324 percent and 0.33.0 per-
cent, respectively.
There are at least two main contributions of this paper. First, the present paper,
to the best of our knowledge, is the rst to consider the quality of roads in the re-
lationship between road access and subjective well-being. Second, the ndings of-
fer a clearer insight into how transportation infrastructure can be translated into
improved well-being and standards of living. In the context of a post-conict,
newly emerging economy like Timor-Leste, the answer to this inquiry is critical
because appropriate transport infrastructure development strategies will be an im-
portant foundation of national development and improvements in Timorese well-
being. Based on our main ndings, Timor-Leste is in dire need of better, and not
necessarily more, roads. Hence, public investment priorities should be devoted to
1 As discussed later in this paper, the 2007 TSLS is the second wave and the latest availableinfor-
mation at the time of writing. Although the reported household identication numbers do not allow us
to pool the 2007 TSLS with its preceding survey, the 2001 TSLS, we employthe 2001 TSLS to rep-
licate our empirical strategies for a robustness check. The results are discussed in Subsection V.3.
ASIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL 92
© 2016 East Asian Economic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT