How do Independent Directors Influence Corporate Risk‐Taking? Evidence from a Quasi‐Natural Experiment

Date01 September 2018
Published date01 September 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12144
AuthorPornsit Jiraporn,Sang Mook Lee
How do Independent Directors
Influence Corporate Risk-Taking?
Evidence from a Quasi-Natural
Experiment
PORNSIT JIRAPORN AND SANG MOOK LEE
Pennsylvania State University School of Graduate Professional Studies, Malvern,
PA, USA
ABSTRACT
Motivated by agency theory,we explore the effect of independent directors on
corporate risk taking. To minimize endogeneity, we exploit the passage of the
SarbanesOxley Act as an exogenous shock that raises board independence.
Our difference-in-difference estimates show that board independence dimin-
ishes risk-taking signicantly,as evidenced by the substantially lower volatility
in the stock returns. In particular, board independence reduces total risk and
idiosyncratic risk by 24.87% and 12.60%, respectively. The evidence is consis-
tent with the notion that board independence represents an effective gover-
nance mechanism that prevents managers from taking excessive risk.
Additional analysis based on propensity score matching also conrms our re-
sults. Our research design is based on a natural experiment and is far more
likely to show causality, rather than merely an association.
JEL Codes: G32; G34
Accepted: 17 June 2017
I. INTRODUCTION
The issue of corporate risk-taking has captured a great deal of attention both in
the media and in academics. Excessive risk-taking by corporate executives, partic-
ularly in the nancial industry,was often blamed for triggering the nancial crisis
of 2008. As a result, it is crucial to understand the nature of corporate risk-taking
in order to prevent or lessen the likelihood of another crisis in the future. It is
generally believed that effective corporate governance can alleviate excessive
risk-taking by corporate executives. In fact, prior research has examined how
governance mechanisms inuence corporate risk-taking. For instance, a number
of studies examine how executive compensation, a primary element of a rms
governance structure, affects risk-taking (Guay 1999; Coles et al. 2006; Low
2009; Dong et al. 2010; Armstrong and Vashishtha 2012; Hayes et al. 2012;
© 2017 International Review of Finance Ltd. 2017
International Review of Finance, 2017
DOI: 10.1111/ir.12144
International Review of Finance, 18:3, 2018: pp. 507–519
DOI:10.1111/irfi.12144
© 2017 International Review of Finance Ltd. 2017

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT